8urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:A71ED5FC-60ED-5DA3-AC8E-F6D2BB5B3573urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C8FA3ADA-5585-4F26-9215-A520EE683979Comparative CytogeneticsCCG1993-07711993-078XPensoft Publishers10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i4.51205120Research ArticlePlantaeEvolutionary biologyGenetics(GAA)n microsatellite as an indicator of the A genome reorganization during wheat evolution and domesticationAdoninaIrina G.1GoncharovNikolay P.1BadaevaEkaterina D.https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-96392SergeevaEkaterina M.1PetrashNadezhda V.3SalinaElena A.salina@bionet.nsc.ru1Institute Cytology and Genetics, RASNovosibirskRussiaN.I.Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, RASMoscowRussiaSiberian Research Institute of Plant Growing and Selection, RASKrasnoobskRussia
Corresponding author: Elena A. Salina (salina@bionet.nsc.ru)
Academic editor: L. Peruzzi
201502092015945335475371FFEB-FF80-FFDD-C81C-BF4BFFD2FF90610C3919-E6A4-4B52-A64A-E1A4AEFDD0695755281604201515062015Irina G. Adonina, Nikolay P. Goncharov, Ekaterina D. Badaeva, Ekaterina M. Sergeeva, Nadezhda V. Petrash, Elena A. SalinaThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/610C3919-E6A4-4B52-A64A-E1A4AEFDD069
Although the wheat A genomes have been intensively studied over past decades, many questions concerning the mechanisms of their divergence and evolution still remain unsolved. In the present study we performed comparative analysis of the A genome chromosomes in diploid (Triticumurartu Tumanian ex Gandilyan, 1972, T.boeoticum Boissier, 1874 and T.monococcum Linnaeus, 1753) and polyploid wheat species representing two evolutionary lineages, Timopheevi (T.timopheevii (Zhukovsky) Zhukovsky, 1934 and T.zhukovskyi Menabde & Ericzjan, 1960) and Emmer (T.dicoccoides (Körnicke ex Ascherson & Graebner) Schweinfurth, 1908, T.durum Desfontaines, 1798, and T.aestivum Linnaeus, 1753) using a new cytogenetic marker – the pTm30 probe cloned from T.monococcum genome and containing (GAA)56 microsatellite sequence. Up to four pTm30 sites located on 1AS, 5AS, 2AS, and 4AL chromosomes have been revealed in the wild diploid species, although most accessions contained one–two (GAA)n sites. The domesticated diploid species T.monococcum differs from the wild diploid species by almost complete lack of polymorphism in the distribution of (GAA)n site. Only one (GAA)n site in the 4AL chromosome has been found in T.monococcum. Among three wild emmer (T.dicoccoides) accessions we detected 4 conserved and 9 polymorphic (GAA)n sites in the A genome. The (GAA)n loci on chromosomes 2AS, 4AL, and 5AL found in of T.dicoccoides were retained in T.durum and T.aestivum. In species of the Timopheevi lineage, the only one, large (GAA)n site has been detected in the short arm of 6At chromosome. (GAA)n site observed in T.monococcum are undetectable in the Ab genome of T.zhukovskyi, this site could be eliminated over the course of amphiploidization, while the species was established. We also demonstrated that changes in the distribution of (GAA)n sequence on the A-genome chromosomes of diploid and polyploid wheats are associated with chromosomal rearrangements/ modifications, involving mainly the NOR (nucleolus organizer region)-bearing chromosomes, that took place during the evolution of wild and domesticated species.
Adonina IG, Goncharov NP, Badaeva ED, Sergeeva EM, Petrash NV, Salina EA (2015) (GAA)n microsatellite as an indicator of the A genome reorganization during wheat evolution and domestication. Comparative Cytogenetics 9(4): 533–547. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i4.5120
Introduction
The genus Triticum Linnaeus, 1753 comprises species at different ploidy levels, from diploid to hexaploid. Common wheat T.aestivum L., 1753 is natural allopolyploid with the genome BBAADD, which emerged about 8–10 thousand years ago (TYA) via the cross of tetraploid Emmer species (BBAA genome) with Aegilopstauschii Cosson, 1850 (DD genome). Another hexaploid wheat, T.zhukovskyi Menabde & Ericzjan, 1960 (genome GGAtAtAbAb) was discovered in 1957, in the Zanduri region of Western Georgia and is regarded as natural allopolyploid of T.timopheevii (Zhukovsky) Zhukovsky, 1934 and T.monococcum L., 1753 growing in the same area (Jakubtsiner 1959, Tavrin 1964). As is currently assumed by the majority of researchers, tetraploid Emmer (T.dicoccoides ((Körnicke ex Ascherson & Graebner) Schweinfurth, 1908, T.durum Desfontaines, 1798, etc. genome BBAA) and Timopheevi (T.araraticum Jakubziner, 1947, T.timopheevii, and T.militinae Zhukovsky & Miguschova, 1969, genome GGAtAt) wheats occurred as a result of hybridization between the ancestral forms of Ae.speltoides Tausch, 1837 as a maternal parent and T.urartu Tumanian ex Gandilyan, 1972, as a paternal parent (Dvorak et al. 1988, Tsunewaki 1996, Huang et al. 2002). Although both evolutionary lineages of the tetraploid wheats originated via hybridization of closely related parental forms, their emergence occurred independently at different times and probably in different places. In particular, the origin of the tetraploid T.dicoccoides is dated back to over 500 TYA, versus T.araraticum, dated back to 50–300 TYA (Mori et al. 1995, Huang et al. 2002, Levy and Feldman 2002).
The diploid wheats are the most ancient members of the genus Triticum. Among them taxonomists recognize three species, namely, cultivated T.monococcum and two wild species, T.boeoticum Boissier, 1874 and T.urartu (Goncharov, 2012). Two different types of the A genome, Au (T.urartu) and Ab (T.boeoticum and T.monococcum L., 1753), have been discriminated among the diploid wheats. According to the current concept, the Au and Ab genomes diverged approximately one million years ago (Huang et al. 2002). Morphologically T.urartu and T.boeoticum are very similar (Filatenko et al. 2002), and differ distinctly only in the leaf pubescence pattern (velvety vs. bristly), controlled by allelic genes (Golovnina et al. 2009). These wild species have overlapping distribution ranges, and in some cases accessions belonging to either one of the species are identified incorrectly.
Despite morphological similarity, the level of genome divergence between T.urartu and T.boeoticum is very high. First of all it is indicated by the sterility of hybrids between T.urartu and T.boeoticum and/or T.monococcum, although in certain combinations of accessions and crossing direction hybrid fertility was elevated from zero to 4.5% (Fricano et al. 2014). Analysis of a broad sample of diploid A-genome species using multilocus markers, such as SSAP (sequence specific amplification polymorphism) and AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) demonstrated considerable genetic differentiation among the accessions; and two super-clusters of diploid wheats have been discriminated among them (Konovalov et al. 2010, Fricano et al. 2014). The first super-cluster contains T.urartu and the second one, domesticated species T.monococcum and its wild progenitor, T.boeoticum. Importantly, intermediate forms between two super-clusters are detectable independently of the approach used for analysis; moreover, solitary accessions morphologically affiliated with T.urartu fall either within the opposite cluster or close to it.
Genome rearrangements, such as translocations, inversions, and the emergence of large blocks of repeats via amplification, are of considerable importance for the reproductive isolation of species. Such large-scale rearrangements are detectable by meiotic chromosome pairing analysis, comparative genome mapping, and FISH with repetitive probes. The data obtained so far suggest that the emergence of two evolutionary lineages of polyploid wheats, Emmer and Timopheevi, was accompanied by several species-specific translocations (Rodriguez et al. 2000, Salina et al. 2006a). Only one of these translocations, 4AL/5AL, which was inherited by polyploid wheat species from their diploid A genome progenitor, is characteristic of both T.urartu and T.monococcum (King et al. 1994, Devos et al. 1995). No information concerning the detection of other intraspecific and interspecific translocations in diploid wheats is available from literature.
One of the approaches for the identification of chromosomal rearrangements is cytogenetic analysis. Despite significant progress in sequencing and mapping of cereal genomes, this method is still most powerful for detection of chromosome aberrations; however, it needs a sufficient pool of cytogenetic markers. The number of cytogenetic markers used for the analysis of A genome chromosome is currently rather few. Single hybridization signals can the obtained with probes pSc119.2, pAs1, pTa71 (45S RNA genes), and pTa794 (5S rRNA genes) (Dubcovsky and Dvořák 1995, Schneider et al. 2003, Megyeri et al. 2012, Uhrin et al. 2012). Several (GAA)n sites have been detected on the A genome chromosomes of polyploid wheat, although signals are located predominantly on the B and G genome chromosomes of wheats and in the S-genome chromosomes of their diploid progenitor Aegilopsspeltoides (Gerlach and Dyer 1980). Hybridization with the (GAA)n probe not always produces stable signals on the A genome chromosomes, since either a synthetic probe or PCR fragments amplified from the wheat or rye genomic DNA were used (Kubaláková et al. 2005, Megyeri et al. 2012).
The goal of this work was to study the rearrangement of the A genome chromosomes of wheats during the evolution based on the distribution of (GAA)n microsatellite on the chromosomes.
Materials and methodsPlant material
The following diploid Triticum species were used in our work (see Table 1 for the complete list): T.boeoticum (2n = 2x = 14, AbAb) – six accessions; T.monococcum (2n = 2x = 14, AbAb) – six accessions, and T.urartu (2n = 2x = 14, AuAu) – seven accessions. For each species we selected accessions differing in the level of genomic divergence. In particular, according to SSAP analysis based on the BARE-1 and Jeli retrotransposons (Konovalov et al. 2010), all accessions of diploid wheats were divided into groups and super-clusters (Table 1). Current analysis included accessions from both well-differentiated super-clusters, T.urartu and T.boeoticum/T.monococcum, as well as three T.urartu accessions (UR3,UR4,UR5) for which the genome affinity determined by morphological traits was not confirmed by molecular analysis (Konovalov et al. 2010).
Accessions of the diploid and polyploid Triticum species used in the work.
Accession/ *group
Species
Subspecies/variety (if available)
Centre of genetic resource
Accession number
Geographic origin
BO2/IG1
T.boeoticum
subsp.thaoudar
Kyoto Univ.
KU8120
Iraq
BO3/IG2
T.boeoticum
–
VIR
K-25811
Armenia
BO9/IG1
T.boeoticum
–
ICARDA
IG116198
Turkey
BO12/IG2
T.boeoticum
subsp.boeoticum
VIR
K-18424
Crimea
BO14/IG1
T.boeoticum
–
USDA
PI427328
Iraq
BO19/IG2
T.boeoticum
subsp.boeoticum
VIR
K-33869a
Armenia
MO1/IG3
T.monococcum
var.macedonicum
VIR
K-18140
Azerbaijan
MO3/IG3
T.monococcum
var.monococcum
VIR
K-20409
Spain
T.monococcum
–
VIR
K-18105
Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region
T.monococcum
–
VIR
K-8555
Crimea
T.monococcum
–
USDA
PI119423
Turkey
T.monococcum
var.hornemannii, population Zanduri
VIR
K-46586
Georgia
UR1/IIG4
T.urartu
–
USDA
PI538736
Lebanon
UR2/IIG4
T.urartu
var.albinigricans
VIR
K-33869b
Armenia
UR3/IG3
T.urartu
–
USDA
PI428276
Lebanon
UR4/IG1
T.urartu
–
ICARDA
IG116196
Turkey
UR5/IG2
T.urartu
var.albinigricans
VIR
K-33871
Armenia
UR6/IIG4
T.urartu
–
ICARDA
IG45298
Syria
UR44/IIG4
T.urartu
–
USDA
PI428182
Armenia
T.timopheevii
population Zanduri
VIR
K-38555
Georgia
T.zhukovskyi
population Zanduri
VIR
K-43063
Georgia
T.dicoccoides
ICARDA
IG46273
Israel
T.dicoccoides
ICARDA
IG46288
Israel
T.dicoccoides
ICARDA
IG139189
Jordan
T.durum
VIR
K-1931
Russia
T.aestivum
ICG
cv. Chinese Spring
China
T.aestivum
var.lutescens
ICG
cv. Saratovskaya 29
Russia
Designation of accessions and their clustering into groups (I/II, superclusters and G, groups) are according to Konovalov et al. (2010).
Polyploid wheat species belonging to either Timopheevi (T.timopheevii, 2n = 4x = 28, GGAtAt, and T.zhukovskyi, 2n = 6x = 42, GGAtAtAbAb), or Emmer evolutionary lineage (T.dicoccoides, 2n = 4x = 28, BBAA, T.durum, 2n = 4x = 28, BBAA, and T.aestivum, 2n = 6x= 42, BBAADD) were analyzed (Table 1).
The plants of all accessions used in our work were grown at the Joint Access Laboratory for Artificial Plant Cultivation for verification of species authenticity by morphological characters using a guide published by Goncharov (2012).
T.zhukovskyi authenticity was verified by electrophoresis of wheat storage proteins (gliadins) (Goncharov et al. 2007).
DNA isolation and cloning
The (GAA)n microsatellite sequence was cloned from einkorn wheat genome in order to increase the resolution of FISH analysis.
Total DNA was isolated from 5–7-day-old seedlings according to Plaschke et al. (1995). PCR for production of (GAA)n microsatellite was conducted according to Vrána et al. (2000) using (CTT)7 and (GAA)7 as primers and T.urartu (IG45298) and T.monococcum (PI119423) DNAs as templates. PCR comprised 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, and synthesis at 72 °C for 1 min. The amplification products were cloned with a Qiagen kit. The clones differing in the length of the insert were selected and sequenced using ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing ready reaction kit (Perkin Elmer Cetus, USA). Sequencing was performed in an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin Elmer Cetus).
Giemsa C-banding
Giemsa C-banding was performed according to the protocol by Badaeva et al. (1994). The slides were examined with a Leitz Wetzlar microscope and recorded with a Leica DFC 280 CCD digital camera. The chromosomes were classified according to the standard nomenclature (Friebe and Gill 1996, Gill et al. 1991).
The work was performed at the Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was conducted as earlier described (Salina et al. 2006b). The probes were labeled with biotin or digoxigenin by nick translation. Biotinylated probes were detected with fluorescein avidin D (Vector Laboratories). The digoxigenin-labeled probes were detected with antibodies to anti-digoxigenin-rhodamine, Fab fragments (Roche Applied Science).
The chromosomes were identified using the pSc119.2 (120 bp, rye repeats; Bedbrook et al. 1980) or pTa71 (45S RNA genes; Gerlach and Bedbrook 1979) probes.
The preparations were embedded into Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories), containing 0.5 µg/ml DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Sigma) for chromosome staining. The chromosomes were examined with an Axioskop 2 Plus (Zeiss) microscope and recorded with a VC-44 (PCO) CCD camera.
The work was performed at the Joint Access Center for Microscopic Analysis of Biological Objects with the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
ResultsCloning of (GAA)n microsatellite
Totally, four clones differing in the length of the insert were selected and sequenced. The clones obtained from T.urartu were designated pTu and from T.monococcum, pTm. All the clones contain (GAA)n microsatellite sequence, but differ in length: pTm30 has a length of 167 bp [(GAA)56]; pTm17, 62 bp [(GAA)21]; pTu33, 56 bp [(GAA)19]; and pTu38, 36 bp [(GAA)12]. The (GAA)56 microsatellite variant pTm30 generating most distinct signals was selected for further work.
Localization of (GAA)n probe on einkorn wheat chromosomes
The new probe pTm30 containing (GAA)56 sequence was hybridized to chromosomal preparations of T.urartu, T.boeoticum and T.monococcum; the pTa71 (45S rRNA genes) probe was used for chromosome identification. As was expected, the 45S ribosomal RNA genes in all species were localized to the nucleolar organizer region in the distal parts of the 1AS and 5AS chromosomes.
The accessions of wild species T.boeoticum and T.urartu displayed polymorphism in the distribution of (GAA)n microsatellite on the chromosomes. One to three pTm30 sites per haploid genome can be detected in these two species (Table 2, Fig. 1). As a whole, (GAA)n can be detected in four positions, on the 1AS, 2AS, 5AS, and 4AL chromosomes of T.boeoticum and T.urartu. The (GAA)n site on the 1AS is observed only in T.urartu, being detectable in four of the seven examined accessions. Both T.boeoticum and T.urartu carry (GAA)n sites on 2AS and 5AS chromosomes; however, the microsatellite is detectable at a higher rate on the 5AS of T.urartu and the 2AS of T.boeoticum. (GAA)n site on the 2AS in one accession of T.boeoticum was heteromorphic between homologous chromosomes (Fig. 1c). Some accessions of T.boeoticum and T.urartu carry a (GAA)n site on the 4AL chromosome.
7A6F4C69-ED0D-5A1D-B0C3-F139EF87E9F7
FISH with probes pTm30 (green signal) and pTa71 (red signal) on the chromosomes of diploid Triticum species: aT.monococcum MO1 bT.boeoticum BO3 cT.boeoticum BO14 and dT.urartu UR6.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/55606
Localization of pTm30 probe on the chromosomes of diploid Triticum species.
Chromosome (arm)
T.boeoticum1
T.urartu1
T.monococcum2
BO2 IG1
BO3 IG2
BO9 IG1
BO12 IG2
BO14 IG1
BO19 IG2
UR1 IIG4
UR2 IIG4
UR3 IG3
UR4 IG1
UR5 IG2
UR6 IIG4
UR4 IIG4
1A(S)
+
+
+
+
2A(S)
+
+
+
+
+
+
5A(S)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4A(L)
+
+
+
+
Designation of accessions and their clustering into groups (I/II, superclusters and G, groups) are according to Konovalov et al. (2010).
Characteristic of five examined T.monococcum accessions; no pTm30 hybridization sites are detected for PI119423.
The domesticated species T.monococcum differs from the wild species by an almost complete lack of polymorphism in the distribution of pTm30 probe. The (GAA)n site in five of the six examined accessions is localized to the pericentromeric region of 4AL (Fig. 1a). No distinct hybridization sites of pTm30 have been found on chromosomes of accession PI119423.
FISH analysis of Timopheevi wheats
The examined accessions of T.timopheevii originated from the Zanduri population (Western Georgia), where the species T.zhukovskyi was first identified. Triticumtimopheevii carries pSc119.2 signals predominantly on the G genome chromosomes and also on 1AtL and 5AtS; the pTa71 signals are present on 6AtS and 6GS chromosomes (Fig. 2). The pTm30 probe intensively hybridized to all G genome chromosomes and generates only one hybridization site on the chromosome 6AtS of the At genome (Fig. 2).
D69FAC1F-51AA-5B8C-928C-AD51B847D5BD
FISH with probe pTm30 (green signal) on the chromosomes of T.zhukovskyi: a red signal, pSc119.2 and b red signal, pTa71.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/55607
Similar results were obtained for hexaploid T.zhukovskyi (2n = 42, GGAtAtAbAb genome), a natural amphiploid resulting from interspecific hybridization between T.timopheevii (2n = 28, GGAtAt genome) and T.monococcum (2n = 14, AA genome). T.zhukovskyi, like T.timopheevii, carries the pTm30 site in the short arm of the 6At chromosome and pSc119.2 on 1AtL (Fig. 2). The remaining At genome chromosomes lack both pTm30 and pSc119.2 signals. The 45S RNA genes were detected on the 6AtS and 6GS chromosomes, as in T.timopheevii, and additionally on 1AbS and 5AbS, as in T.monococcum (Fig. 2). No pTm30 hybridization sites, which could have been donated by T.monococcum, have been detected.
C-banding and FISH analysis of Emmer wheats
Since karyotyping of the A genome of polyploid wheats by FISH alone is not precise, Giemsa C-banding was also used in order to identify all chromosomes of T.dicoccoides, T.durum, and T.aestivum. In addition, the distribution pattern of probe pSc119.2 was considered, when identifying the chromosomes.
Among three T.dicoccoides accessions we identified the conserved pSc119.2 sites in subtelomeric regions of 1AS and 4AL chromosomes (Fig. 3), whereas polymorphic pSc119.2 sites were detected on chromosomes 5AS (subtelomeric localization), 5AL (intercalary localization), and 2AL (intercalary localization).
A727A3C9-0CF2-5796-B64C-4F45A17D6B75
Localization of probe pTm30 on the chromosomes of Emmer wheats and C-banding. Accessions of T.dicoccoides: pTm30 (red) and pSc119.2 (green); accessions of T.aestivum: pTm30 (green) and pSc119.2 (red).
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/55608
A comparative analysis of the A genome chromosomes of T.dicoccoides by FISH with pTm30 probe revealed both conserved and polymorphic (GAA)n signals (Fig. 3). The 1A lacked (GAA)n site during tetraploid formation, while up to two polymorphic (GAA)n loci were detectable on the 3A, 6A, and 7A chromosomes. The highest number of pTm30 hybridization sites was observed on the 2A and 4A chromosomes; of them, the pericentromeric site on 2AS and proximal and distal sites on 4AL were conserved. Chromosome 5AL carried a conserved (GAA)n site in the proximal region; no polymorphic blocks were detected. Note also that the localization of (GAA)n, as was expected, always coincided with the position of C-bands; however, for approximately 20% of the C-bands no corresponding (GAA)n regions have been detected.
The distribution of pTm30 hybridization sites on the A genome chromosomes of two hexaploid wheat cultivars, Chinese Spring and Saratovskaya 29, was similar (Fig. 3).
The absence of (GAA)n microsatellite on the 1A chromosome was the common feature for all T.dicoccoides, T.durum, and T.aestivum accessions. In addition, the conserved (GAA)n sites on T.dicoccoides chromosomes 2AS, 4AL, and 5AL were remained in T.durum and T.aestivum.
Discussion(GAA)n as a cytogenetic marker for einkorn wheat
The goal of the search for cytogenetic markers for the wheat A genome dates back to the very first application of cytogenetic methods to analysis of chromosome structure and phylogeny of Triticum species. This was due to both a small number of C-bands detectable by Giemsa staining and the difficulties in FISH-based distinguishing between the A genome chromosomes. In particular, two cytogenetic markers, pSc119.2 and pAs1, are able to discriminate all B and D genomes chromosomes of Emmer wheat, but only three A genome chromosomes (Schneider et al. 2003). The pSc119.2 probe hybridized mainly to the B genome chromosomes of polyploid wheats belonging to Emmer evolutionary lineage, as has been demonstrated for hexaploid T.aestivum and tetraploid T.durum (Schneider et al. 2003; Kubaláková et al. 2005). In the A-genome of hexaploid wheat, the pSc119.2 hybridization sites were detected only on chromosomes 2AL, 4AL (subtelomeric localization), 5AS (subtelomeric localization), and 5AL (intercalary site). Note that different wheat cultivars display polymorphism in distribution of pSc119.2 probe on the A-genome chromosomes (Schneider et al. 2003). Involvement of additional probes—pTa71 (45S RNA) and pTa794 (5S RNA genes), localized to 1A (pTa71 and pTa794) and 5A (pTa794) chromosomes—failed to improve the resolution of this assay. The (GAA)n microsatellite, detected in all A genome chromosomes of common and durum wheat except for 1A (Fig. 3), is mainly used for chromosome sorting in polyploid wheats (Pedersen and Langridge 1997; Vrána et al. 2000; Kubaláková et al. 2005). However the direct application of this probe to phylogenetic studies of the A genome of polyploid wheats is hardly possible, because it gives only few minor signals compared to numerous major hybridization sites on the B and G genome chromosomes (Fig. 2; Kubaláková et al. 2005; Cuadrado et al. 2008).
The situation with chromosome identification in einkorn wheat is even more complex. The probes that are frequently used in molecular cytogenetic analysis of polyploid wheats, such as pSc119.2 and pAs1, either do not hybridize to einkorn chromosomes at all, or give few fuzzy signals (Megyeri et al. 2012, Danilova et al. 2012, I.G. Adonina, unpublished data). The rDNA markers, pTa71 and pTa794, produce conserved hybridization sites on the 1AS and 5AS chromosomes and fail to distinguish the einkorn genomes. An Afa probe, PCR-amplified from the genomic DNA of common wheat (Megyeri et al. 2012), may be the most promising for the study of chromosome reorganization of the A genomes. The Afa probe produces numerous hybridization sites; however, so far this has been demonstrated for only one accession of T.monococcum.
The distribution of (GAA)n microsatellite on chromosomes of the A genome diploid species has not been studied until recently. Dvorak (2009) wrote in his review referring to the works of Peacock et al. (1981) and Pedersen (et al. 1996) that (GAA)n sequence is absent in the diploid A genome donors of common wheat. However, karyotype analysis of individual T.monococcum and T.urartu accessions employing either (GAA)9 oligonucleotide or GAA fragments amplified by PCR from wheat genomic DNA has been recently reported (Danilova et al. 2012, Megyeri et al. 2012). Megyeri et al. (2012) studied one accession of T.monococcum and discovered two chromosomes with major hybridization sites of the (GAA)n probe in their distal and pericentromeric regions, which were identified as 2AS and 6AL, respectively, based on the distribution of Afa family and pTa71 probe. Danilova et al. (2012) identified the chromosomes more precisely using FLcDNAs and defined the chromosomes carrying the major sites as 2AS and 4AL in T.monococcum and 1AS in T.urartu. In addition, one to three minor (GAA)n sites were detected in two studied accessions of diploid species. So far, no publications describing the (GAA)n distribution on T.boeoticum chromosomes has been reported.
As has been demonstrated here, the pTm30 produces up to four major hybridization sites on the A genome chromosomes of diploid wheats (1AS, 2AS, 5AS, and 4AL), while any minor hybridization sites are undetectable. All four major hybridization sites are present in T.urartu only, and the site on 1AL is absent in T.monococcum and T.boeoticum. Interestingly, T.urartu accessions belonging to super-cluster II (urartu) mainly display two (GAA)n sites, on the 1AS and 5AS chromosomes, also carrying the 45S RNA genes. The major (GAA)n site on 1AS and minor site on 5AS have been also detected in the T.urartu accession by Danilova et al. (2012). An interesting fact has been obtained by FISH analysis of the three T.urartu accessions (UR3, UR4, and UR5), which were regarded as intermediate forms according to comparison of morphological and SSAP data (Tables 1 and 2). All three accessions differ in the distribution of (GAA)n microsatellite. However, UR5 accession is attributed to super-cluster II (urartu) according to pTm30 [(GAA)56] pattern, while UR3 and UR4 carry (GAA)n sites on the 2AS and 4AL chromosomes, which are mainly characteristic of T.boeoticum and T.monococcum. Cultivated einkorn T.monococcum displays the lowest polymorphism. We found pTm30 hybridization site on one chromosome pair only, designated 4AL.
Thus, it has been shown that the (GAA)n microsatellite can be used as marker for the 1AS, 2AS, 4AL, and 5AS chromosomes of einkorn wheat; however, it should be kept in mind that depending on species, the number of hybridization sites varies from zero to three in individual accessions. The (GAA)n site on chromosome 1AS is present only in T.urartu, while T.boeoticum and T.monococcum often carry (GAA)n site on the chromosome 4AL.
Evolutionary reorganization of the A genomes in diploid and polyploid wheat species
The evolution of diploid and polyploid wheat species is known to be accompanied by reorganization of the genomes. At the diploid level, genome divergence occurs via accumulation of DNA mutations, amplifications/deletions of tandem repeats, proliferation of mobile elements, and, in some cases, chromosomal rearrangements (Devos et al. 1995, Salina et al. 2011, Fricano et al. 2014). Polyploid wheat displays a high level of chromosome rearrangements (Jiang and Gill 1994, Rodriguez et al. 2000, Salina et al. 2006a, Badaeva et al. 2007).
As any other tandem repeats, microsatellites frequently form large clusters on chromosomes, detectable with FISH. The polymorphism of satellite repeats most typically involve changes in the copy number, resulting in the appearance/elimination of large blocks of repeated sequences.
Study of the distribution of (GAA)n hybridization sites in diploid and polyploid wheats allows us to propose that several factors could have led to redistribution of regions housing this microsatellite. In particular, a decrease in the number of major microsatellite blocks in domesticated T.monococcum may only be a result genetic diversity shortage caused by bottleneck effect during domestication. Another important fact is that all studied accessions of polyploid wheat species T.dicoccoides, T.durum, T.aestivum, and T.timopheevii lack hybridization sites on the short arms of their 1A and 5A chromosomes (Fig. 3), which are characteristic of T.urartu, a putative donor of the A genome. The most likely reason for such event is the involvement of (GAA)n loci in reorganization of the nucleolus organizer region on the A genome chromosomes during formation and stabilization of primary allotetraploids which took place about 500 TYA. This resulted in total loss of 45S DNA locus and (GAA)n site on the 5AS as well as in the significant reduction in the number of 45S RNA gene copies (Jiang and Gill 1994) and the loss of (GAA)n site on the 1AS chromosome (Fig. 3). Hexaploid species T.zhukovskyi (genome GGAtAtAbAb) was formed about 60YA or more via the cross of T.timopheevii (genome GGAtAt) and T.monococcum (genome AbAb). According to our data, this species retained the 45S DNA loci on the 1AbS and 5AbS chromosomes, inherited from T.monococcum, however, the Ab genome chromosomes of T.zhukovskyi lacks (GAA)n sites observed in T.monococcum. This can be due to either the lack of such sites in the parental T.monococcum form, or elimination of (GAA)n loci over the course of amphiploidization, while the species was established.
As in the parental species T.timopheevii, T.zhukovskyi displays only one (GAA)n site in the short arm of chromosome 6At, near the nucleolus organizer region. It is known that the T6AS/1GS translocation took place during T.timopheevii speciation (Jiang and Gill 1994). Thus, it is likely that the (GAA)n site on appeared a result of this translocation.
The (GAA)n sites of the einkorn wheat that are localized to more conserved chromosome regions, namely, pericentromeric regions of 2AS and 4AL, were inherited by all polyploid Emmer species (Fig. 3). No (GAA)n sites have been detected on the At genome homoeologous chromosomes of Timopheevi wheats, thereby confirming that their origin is independent from the Emmer group.
Thus, amplification and cloning of the long fragment of (GAA)n sequence from T.monococcum genome allowed us to obtain the new DNA probe for analysis of the A-genome chromosomes in diploid and polyploid wheat. An increased sequence length provides for higher probe stability, which enhances resolution of hybridization. Using a new probe we defined differences between Ab and Au variants of the A-genomes, revealed variability of labeling patterns among T.boeoticum and T.urartu accessions, and significant shortage of polymorphism in T.monococcum, probably due to domestication. We suppose that distribution of (GAA)n sites in diploid and polyploid species reflects the chromosome reorganizations, mainly including the nucleolus organize region, that have taken place during the evolution of wild and domesticated species.
Acknowledgements
The study of diploid species was done in framework of the State Budget Program (Project No VI.53.1.5.), the analysis of polyploid wheats was supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation (Project No. 14-14-00161).
ReferencesBadaevaEDBadaevNSGillBSFilatenkoA (1994) Intraspecific karyotype divergence in Triticumararaticum (Poaceae).192: 117–145. doi: 10.1007/BF00985912BadaevaEDDedkovaOSGayGPukhalskyiVAZeleninAVBernardSBernardM (2007) Chromosomal rearrangements in wheat: their types and distribution.50: 907–926. doi: 10.1139/G07-072BedbrookJRJonesJO’DellMThompsonRDFlavellRB (1980) A molecular description of telomeric heterochromatin in Secale species.19: 545–560. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90529-2CuadradoACardosoMJouveN (2008) Increasing the physical markers of wheat chromosomes using SSRs as FISH probes.51: 809–815. doi: 10.1139/G08-065DanilovaTVFriebeBGillBS (2012) Single-copy gene fluorescence in situ hybridization and genome analysis: Acc-2 loci mark evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements in wheat.121: 597–611. doi: 10.1007/s00412-012-0384-7DevosKMDubkovskyJDvorakJChinoyCNGaleMD (1995) Structural evolution of wheat chromosomes 4A, 5A, and 7B and its impact on recombination.91: 282–288. doi: 10.1007/BF00220890DubcovskyJDvorakJ (1995) Ribosomal RNA multigene loci: nomads of the Triticeae genomes.140: 1367–1377. DvorakJ (2009) Triticeae Genome Structure and Evolution. In: FeuilletCMuehlbauerGJ (Eds) (Volume 7). Springer-Verlag, New York, 685–711. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77489-3_23DvorakJMcGuirePECassidyB (1988) Apparent sources of the A genomes of wheats inferred from the polymorphism in abundance and restriction fragment length of repeated nucleotide sequences.30: 680–689. doi: 10.1139/g88-115FilatenkoAGrauMKnüpfferHHammerK (2002) Discriminating characters of diploid wheat species.September 10–12, Cordoba, Spain, 2002, 153–156. FricanoABrandoliniARossiniLSourdillePWunderJEffgenSHidalgoAErbaDPiffanelliPSalaminiF (2014) Crossability of Triticumurartu and Triticummonococcum wheats, homoeologous recombination, and description of a panel of interspecific introgression lines.4: 1931–1941. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.013623FriebeBGillBS (1996) Chromosome banding and genome analysis in diploid and cultivated polyploid wheats. In: JauharPP (Ed.) . CRC Press, Boca Ration, 39–60. GerlachWLBedbrookJR (1979) Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley.7: 1869–1885. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.7.1869GerlachWLDyerTA (1980) Sequence organization of the repeated units in the nucleus of wheat which contains 5S-rRNA genes.8: 4851–4865. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.21.4851GillBSFriebeBEndoTR (1991) Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description ofchromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticumaestivum).34: 830–839. doi: 10.1139/g91-128GolovninaKKondratenkoEBlinovAGoncharovN (2009) Phylogeny of the A genomes of wild and cultivated wheat species.45: 1360–1367. doi: 10.1134/S1022795409110106GoncharovNP (2012) Geo, Novosibirsk, 523 pp. [In Russian]GoncharovNPBannikovaSVKawaharaT (2007) Wheat artificial amphiploids with Triticumtimopheevii genome: preservation and reproduction of wheat artificial amphiploids.54: 1507–1514. doi: 10.1007/s10722-006-9141-1HuangSSirikhachornkitASuXFarisJGillBHaselkornRGornickiP (2002) Genes encoding plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase of the Triticum/Aegilops complex and the evolutionary history of polyploid wheat.99: 8133–8138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072223799JakubtsinerMM (1959) New wheat species., 207–220. JiangJGillBS (1994) Different species-specific chromosome translocation in Triticum timopheevii and T.turgidum support diphyletic origin of polyploid wheats.2: 59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF01539455KingIPPurdieKALiuCJReaderSMOrfordSEPittawayTSMillerTE (1994) Detection of interchromosomal translocations within the Triticeae by RFLP analysis.37: 882–887. doi: 10.1139/g94-125KonovalovFAGoncharovNPGoryunovaSShaturovaAProshlyakovaTKudryavtsevA (2010) Molecular markers based on LTR retrotransposons BARE-1 and Jeli uncover different strata of evolutionary relationships in diploid wheats.283: 551–563. doi: 10.1007/s00438-010-0539-2LevyAVFeldmanM (2002) The impact of polyploidy on grass genome evolution.130: 1587–1593. doi: 10.1104/pp.015727MegyeriMFarkasAVargaMKovacsGMolnar-LangMMolnarI (2012) Karyotypic analysis of Triticummonococcum using standard repetitive DNA probes and simple sequence repeats.60(2): 87–95. doi: 10.1556/AAgr.60.2012.2.1MoriNLiuYGTsunewakiK (1995) Wheat phylogeny determined by RFLP analysis of nuclear DNA. 2. Wild tetraploid wheats.90: 129–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00221006PeacockWJGerlachWLDennisES (1981) Molecular aspects of wheat evolution: repeated DNA sequences. In: EvansLTPeacockWJ (Eds) . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41–60. PedersenCRasmussenSKLinde-LaursenI (1996) Genome and chromosome identification in cultivated barley and related species of the Triticeae (Poaceae) by in situ hybridization with the GAA-satellite sequence.39(1): 93–104. doi: 10.1139/g96-013PedersenCLangridgeP (1997) Identification of the entire chromosome complement of bread wheat by two-colour FISH.40: 589–593. doi: 10.1139/g97-077PlaschkeJGanalMWRöderMS (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers.91: 1001–1007. doi: 10.1007/bf00223912RodriguezSPereraEMaestraBDiezMNaranjoT (2000) Chromosome structure of Triticumtimopheevii relative to T.turgidum.43: 923–930. doi: 10.1139/g00-062SalinaEALeonovaINEfremovaTTRöderMS (2006a) Wheat genome structure: translocations during the course of polyploidization.6: 71–80. doi: 10.1007/s10142-005-0001-4SalinaEALimYKBadaevaEDShcherbanABAdoninaIGAmosovaAVSamatadzeTEVatolinaTYuZoshchukSALeitchAA (2006b) Phylogenetic reconstruction of AegilopssectionSitopsis and the evolution of tandem repeats in the diploids and derived wheat polyploids.49: 1023–1035. doi: 10.1139/G06-050SalinaEASergeevaEMAdoninaIGShcherbanABBelcramHHuneauCChalhoubB (2011) The impact of Ty3-gypsy group LTR retrotransposons Fatima on B-genome specificity of polyploid wheats.11: 99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-99SchneiderALincGMolnar-LangM (2003) Fluorescence in situ hybridization polymorphism using two repetitive DNA clones in different cultivars of wheat. Plant Breeding.122: 396–400. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00891.xTavrinEV (1964) Towards the origin of species T.zhukovskyi Men. et Er.36(1): 89–96. [In Russian] TsunewakiK (1996) Plasmon analysis as the counterpart of genome analysis. In: JauharPP (Ed.) . CRC Press, Boca Ration, 271–299. UhrinASzakacsELangLBedoZMolnar-LangM (2012) Molecular cytogenetic characterization and SSR marker analysis of a leaf rust resistant wheat line carrying a 6G(6B) substitution from Triticumtimopheevii (Zhuk.).186: 45–55. doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0483-1VranaJKubalakovaMSimkovaHCihalikovaJLysakMADolezelJ (2000) Flow sorting of mitotic chromosomes in common wheat (Triticumaestivum L.).156: 2033–2041.