(C) 2014 Andrey Grishanin. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.
This article provides an overview of research on chromatin diminution (CD) in copepods. The phenomenology, mechanisms and biological role of CD are discussed. A model of CD as an alternative means of regulating cell differentiation is presented. While the vast majority of eukaryotes inactivate genes that are no longer needed in development by heterochromatinization, copepods probably use CD for the same purpose. It is assumed that the copepods have exploited CD as a tool for adaptation to changing environmental conditions and as a mechanism for regulating the rate of evolutionary processes.
Chromatin diminution, evolution, Cyclopoida, Copepoda, Crustacea
Chromatin diminution (CD) in Cyclopoidais the removal of part ofthe chromosomal material from cells of the somatic cells line in one or two sequential cleavage divisions, while germ-line cells retain their nuclear DNA unchanged throughout ontogeny (
The phenomenon of chromatin diminution (CD) has been discovered in 23 species of freshwater copepods (Table 1). The timing of CD is species-specific and occurs during one or two cell cycles in early embryogenesis. Numerous studies of CD have shown that during early embryonic cells divisions, somatic cells lose from 45% to 94% of DNA whereas germ line cells preserve the initial amount of DNA Cyclops furcifer Claus, 1857, Cyclops strenuus divulsus Lindberg, 1957, Cyclops strenuus strenuus Fisher, 1851 and Mesocyclops edax Forbes, 1891 during prophase of their first meiotic division (
Of special interest is the research on genome endoreduplication in cyclops with CD (Rash et al. 2008,
Cytogenetic characteristics of Cyclopoida species with chromatin diminution (CD). 1
Species | PD/ SC | n | CD time (cleavage division) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acanthocyclops incolotaenia Mazepova, 1950 | nd | nd | nd | 13 |
Acanthocyclops robustus Sars G.O., 1863 | nd | 4 | 6 | 5, 18 |
Acanthocyclops vernalis Fischer, 1853 | nd | nd | 5 | 1 |
Apocyclops paramensis Marsh, 1913 | nd | nd | 7 | 5 |
Cyclops abyssorum Sars GO, 1863 | nd | nd | 5 | 8 |
Cyclops bohater Kozminski, 1933 | nd | nd | 5 | 8 |
Cyclops insignis Claus, 1857 | nd | nd | 5 | 8 |
Cyclops furcifer Claus, 1857 | 2 | 11 | 6, 7 | 3 |
Cyclops heberti Einsle, 1996 | nd | nd | 5 | 10 |
Cyclops kikuchi Smirnov, 1932 | nd | 11 | nd | 9, 14 |
Cyclops kolensis Lilljeborg 1901 | 15.6–16.4 | 11 | 4 | 11, 20 |
//------//-------// | 11.2–12.4 | 11 | 4 | 17 |
//------//-------// | 31–40 | 11 | 4 | 19 |
Cyclops singularis Einsle, 1996 | nd | nd | 4 | 10 |
Cyclops strenuus divulsus Lindberg, 1957 | 1.7 | 11 | 5 | 3 |
Cyclops strenuus strenuus Fisher, 1851 | 2.4 | 11 | 4 | 3 |
//------//------// | 4 | 12 | 5, 6 | 11 |
//------//------// | 5.7 | nd | nd | 15 |
Cyclops vicinus Ulyanin, 1875 | nd | 11 | nd | 7, 9 |
Diacyclops galbinus Mazepova 1950 | 11.9–13.2 | nd | nd | 13 |
Diacyclops navus Herrick, 1882 | nd | nd | 5 | 5 |
Mesocyclops edax Forbes, 1891 | 5.2–10.5 | 7 | 4 | 4, 15, 16 |
Mesocyclops longisetus Thiébaud, 1912 | 9.5 | nd | 6 | 5, 15 |
Mesocyclops longisetus curvatus Dussart, 1987 | 14.6 | nd | nd | 15 |
Metacyclops mendocinus Wierzeiski, 1892 | 10 | nd | nd | 15 |
Microcyclops varicans Sars G.O., 1863 | nd | nd | nd | 2 |
Paracyclops affinis Sars G.O., 1863 | 1.75 | nd | nd | 12 |
1) Preparation for the reduction of a major part of the genome, which involves lengthening of the prediminution interphase and the appearance of G-bands in chromosomes prior to diminution. The G-bands might be involved in reprogramming the functionally active part of the genome through the mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone modifications of somatic cells chromosomes before CD;
2) Activation of the sites of chromosomes breaks during interphase of the cell cycle when CD occurs. It is probable that the chromosomes breakage sites are localized in regions associated with the nuclear matrix;
3) Cutting at chromosomes breakage sites. Immediately after cutting, the chromosome DNA strand is restored;
4) Compacting of the excised DNA and formation of a pore-free membrane around it to produce granules;
5) Degradation of the granules of excised DNA during 2–3 subsequent divisions.
Thus, the CD process, presumably, involve many genes.
CD is unique in producing a dramatic reorganization of the entire nuclear genome during a relatively short period of ontogeny. During CD large regions of heterochromatin are removed from chromosomes of the somatic cells line. Prior to CD, presomatic cells of cyclops in interphase have a nuclear structure that is highly ordered in terms of the spatial distribution of eu- and heterochromatin. There is a strong opinion based on numerous facts that silent genes are localized in the heterochromatin compartments at the nuclear periphery, whereas active genes are located in the central part (
Cytogenetic characteristics of Thermocyclops crassus Fischer, 1853 and some species of Mesocyclops Sars, 1913. 1
Species | 1C(pg) SC | n | CD | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mesocyclops edax Forbes, 1891 | 1.47 | 7 | present | 1, 2 |
Mesocyclops ruttneri Kiefer, 1981 | 0.72 | 7 | no CD | 1 |
Mesocyclops leuckarti Claus, 1857 | 0.38 | 7 | no CD | 1 |
Mesocyclops woutersi van de Velde, 1987 | 0.38 | no data | no CD | 1 |
Thermocyclops crassus (russian population) | 1.2 | 7 | no CD | 3, 4 |
Thermocyclops crassus (vietnamese population) | 0.42 | no data | no CD | 1 |
The detection of polyploid cells in some Cyclops species raises another side of the biological significance of CD (
DNA sequences is offset by the necessity of replicating and maintaining multiple copies of much additional genetic material that will never be required in differentiated somatic cells. An alternative but more economical path to the same end is to eliminate unused DNA from the somatic cells line genome during CD and then to repeatedly amplify the genome of somatic cells.
Based on the above reasoning we can make the following assumptions about biological role of CD:
1. Chromatin diminution is an alternative form of regulation of cell differentiation during which there is a total loss of mostly redundant DNA, while in the vast majority of eukaryotes part of the genome is inactivated through heterochromatinization;
2. CD coevolves with polyploidy to regulate gene dosage in somatic tissues;
3. CD is a tool for adaptation to changing environmental conditions;
4. CD is a mechanism for regulating the rate of evolutionary processes.
Thus, even a brief acquaintance with the facts established recently permits a conclusion that the phenomenon of CD is a unique tool to study the eukaryotic nucleus organization and some questions of evolution.
The author is grateful to Dr. C.S. Rose and K.A. Leitich for help in discussing and editing the English text and to Comparative Cytogenetics Editors and reviewers for the help in editing of the manuscript.