Research Articles
Research Articles
Further karyosystematic studies of the Boreonectes griseostriatus (De Geer) group of sibling species (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)–characterisation of B. emmerichi (Falkenström, 1936) and additional European data
expand article infoRobert B. Angus, Elizabeth M. Angus§, Fenglong Jia|, Zhen-ning Chen, Ying Zhang
‡ Royal holloway, University of London, London, United Kingdom
§ National Health Service, Southampton, United Kingdom
| Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
¶ Qinghai Normal University, Xining, China
Open Access


A lectotype is designated for the Tibetan species Deronectes emmerichi Falkenström, 1936 (Currently Boreonectes emmerichi (Falkenström)), and its habitus, as well as the median lobe and parameres of its aedeagus, are figured along with additional comparative material. Material of B. emmerichi from Sikkim (BMNH) represents the first record of a Boreonectes Angus, 2010 species from India. The karyotype of B. emmerichi is described as having 26 pairs of autosomes plus sex chromosomes which are X0 (♂), XX (♀). The karyotype is most like that of B. macedonicus (Géuorguiev, 1959), but with slight differences. Additional chromosomal information is given for B. griseostriatus griseostriatus (De Geer, 1774) in the French Alps, B. g. strandi (Brinck, 1943) on the Kola Peninsula, B. multilineatus (Falkenström, 1922) in the Pyrenees and B. ibericus (Dutton & Angus, 2007) in the Spanish Picos de Europa.


Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Karyotype, C-banding, species complex, Tibet, lectotype, Sikkim, first record from India


The group of species related to Boreonectes griseostriatus (De Geer, 1774) presents serious taxonomic problems. Helliesen (1890), working in Norway, recognised an inland montane stripy form, which he regarded as true griseostriatus, and a coastal, more blotchy form, which he named maritimus sp. n. Falkenström (1922) showed that De Geer’s griseostriatus in fact referred to the coastal form, and described the inland form as Deronectes multilineatus Falkenström, 1922. Many subsequent authors rejected the notion that more than one species was involved. Thus Zaitzev (1953) in the Israeli English translation (1972) noted that “This species (B. griseostriatus) varies markedly in many characters; all attempts to establish subspecies and varieties are unjustified, because almost all varieties are connected by transitions.” However, chromosome analysis by Angus began to show that several species were involved and Dutton and Angus (2007) demonstrated the existence of seven chromosomally distinct species, all difficult or even impossible to recognise on external morphology. Further investigations by Angus (2008, 2009, 2010a, b) gave more information, culminating in the erection of a new genus, Boreonectes Angus, 2010, for these and some related species. However, there remain a number of described Palaearctic taxa for which there are no chromosomal data. Prominent among these is B. emmerichi (Falkenström, 1936), described from Sichuan and regarded as widespread in Tibet (Nilsson and Hájek 2015).

A beetle-collecting trip to the Tibetan Plateau in June 2013 (Angus 2013) enabled the senior author to obtain living material of B. emmerichi. Laboratory facilities in Qinghai Normal University enabled preparation of slides with dividing cells for karyotype investigation. The opportunity is also taken to include additional data on European species.

Material and methods

The species studied are listed in Table 1 and the localities are shown in Figs 4, 79. The museums housing material discussed here are the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm (NRMS), the Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou (SYSU) and the Barcelona branch of the Spanish Institute for Evolutionary Biology (IBEB). The methods of chromosome preparation, C-banding and photography are as given by Dutton and Angus (2007), with the treatment times in colchicine and ½-isotonic KCl each 12 minutes. With the Chinese material (B. emmerichi) C-banding was attempted in London, several weeks after initial preparation of the slides. This was moderately successful, though not as good as that obtained with 48-hour-old slides. Specimens from which chromosomes were obtained are housed in the BMNH. Habitus photographs of whole beetles (apart from the Nam Tso specimen, for which Ignacio Ribera sent the picture) were taken with a Leica M125 stereomicroscope + Canon EOS 550D digital camera, and the parameres with a Zeiss Axioskop + Canon EOS 450D digital camera, in the Sackler Bioimaging Laboratory of the Natural History Museum. Both were stacked using Helicon Focus software. The scanning electron micrographs are of uncoated specimens. Those shown in Fig. 2a–f were taken in the Electron Microscope Unit of the Natural History Museum, using a Zeiss Leo 1455VP SEM in low vacuum mode and back-scattered electrons. The one in Fig. 2g was taken in the Biomedical Imaging Unit of Southampton General Hospital, using an FEI Quanta 200 SEM in low vacuum mode, using secondary electrons to image.

Material used for chromosome analysis.

Species Locality No. of specimens analysed Location of specimens
B. emmerichi China, Qinghai Province, Gangca, 1 km SE of Gangca Dasi. (Fig. 4) 2 ♂♂, 1♀
(Whole beetle illustrated.)
China, Qinghai Province, ca 20 km W of Maduo. (Fig. 4) 3♂♂, 2♀♀
(Whole beetles illustrated.)
CHINA, Xizang Autonomous Region, Sejilashan. (Fig. 4) (Whole beetle illustrated.) SYSU, BMNH
CHINA, Xizang Autonomous Region, Nam Tso. (Fig. 4) (Whole beetle illustrated.) IBEB
INDIA, Sikkim, Lachen. (Fig. 4) (Whole beetle illustrated.) BMNH
B. g. griseostriatus France, Savoie, S of Lac du Mont Cenis. (Fig. 7) 2 ♂♂, 2♀♀ BMNH
B. g. strandi Russia, Kola Peninsula, near Teriberka. Leg. P. Petrov. (Fig. 8) 5 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ BMNH
B. multilineatus France, Hautes-Pyrénées, Lac d’Anapéou. Leg. F. Bameul. (Fig. 9) 5 ♂♂ BMNH
B. ibericus Spain, Cantabria, Lagos de Lloroza. (Fig. 9) 1 ♂ BMNH

Results and discussion

B. emmerichi (Falkenström, 1936: 88)

Falkenström described B. emmerichi (as Deronectes emmerichi) from 15 specimens, including five males, from the Kangding area of Sichuan, on the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. Seven specimens are listed with the data “China, Szechuan, Mukue-Tatsienlu” and eight “China, Szechuan, Tatsienlu Tjiji (Urwald Rodungen)”. Tatsienlu is the former name of Kangding and Urwald Rodungen (a German term) are clearings in primary forest. Three syntypes, an intact male labelled as Holotypus, a dissected male without the genitalia and a female labelled as Allotypus, are housed in the Falkenström collection (NRMS) and there is a further female syntype in London (BMNH). We do not know the whereabouts of the other specimens listed by Falkenström. The female with the Allotypus label has a data label “China, Szechuan, Mukue-Tatsienlu” but all the others have the labels “China, Szechuan, Tatsienlu Tjiji (Urwald Rodungen)”. The intact male is here designated lectotype, so the type locality is fixed as Tatsienlu Tjiji, 29°59.906'N, 101°57.492'E. The remaining specimens are paralectotypes. We have dissected this male, and the median lobe (penis) is shown in Fig. 2a, left paramere in Fig. 3a and habitus in Fig. 1a. As noted by Falkenström, this is a rather dark species, with the black markings very heavy. All the specimens are similarly dark, and the London female is shown in Fig. 1b. This heavy dark pattern is matched by material collected by Fenglong Jia in swampy pools among dense bushes on Sejilashan Mountain near Namcha Barwa in SE Xizang (Jia et al. 2012) (Fig. 1c). It seems likely that this dark pattern is associated with wooded or bushy habitats–the type localities are clearly in a wooded zone. Material from Sikkim (BMNH) is also dark, and rather small (Fig. 1d). This material, 10 specimens with the data “Sikkim. Tangu. 11500 ft. 26.iv.1924. Maj. R. W. G. Hingston” represents the first known occurrence of a Boreonectes species in India. The locality Tangu is given by Google earth as Lachen, with an altitude of 2749 m. To attain an altitude of 11500 ft (3505 m) it is necessary to travel about 10 km further north along the road to Tibet (Gurudongmar Road). One specimen is further labelled “In a mountain pool” and one female is carrying a spermatophore of the Nebrioporus pattern (Shirt and Angus 1992).

Figure 1.

Habitus photographs of Boreonectes emmerichi. a lectotype ♂ b paralectotype ♀ c dark ♂, Sejilashan, Xizang d small dark ♂; Lachen, Sikkim e ♀, Gangca Dasi f ♂, Maduo (aedeagal median lobe: Fig. 2c) g ♂, Maduo (aedeagal median lobe: Fig. 2b) h ♀, Nam Tso. Scale = 1 mm.

Figure 2.

Scanning electron micrographs of aedeagal median lobes (ventral view). a B. emmerichi, lectotype b–d B. emmerichi, Maduo d with a partially extruded spermatophore e, f B. emmerichi, Gangca Dasi g B. macedonicus, Karanikoličko Jezero, Macedonia; Scale = 0.2 mm.

Material from more open areas of the Tibetan Plateau, from Gangca in the north to Nam Tso in the south, has the dark markings less extensive, especially on the pronotum (Fig. 1e–h). There is some variation in the size and shape of the median lobe. The lectotype has the median lobe elongate and slightly longer than in some material (Fig. 2a), but material taken in shallow pools in the riverine flatlands about 20 km E of Maduo includes specimens with larger more elongate median lobes (Fig. 1b) as well as shorter relatively broader ones (Fig. 1c, d) while material from Gangca Dasi shows some variation in median lobe width (Fig. 1e, f). This material appears to be chromosomally uniform, as would be expected if all the specimens belong to the same species, B. emmerichi. The median lobe of B. macedonicus, which has a similar karyotype to B. emmerichi, is shown in Fig. 2g. It is noticeably smaller than that of B. emmerichi. Fig. 3a shows the left paramere of the B. emmerichi lectotype, while a Gangca Dasi specimen is shown in Fig. 3b.

Figure 3.

Boreonectes emmerichi, left parameres. a lectotype b Gangca Dasi. Scale = 0.5 mm.

Further support for the view that all the Tibetan material discussed here belongs to the same species is given by unpublished preliminary DNA data supplied by Ignacio Ribera. The mitochondrial gene CO1 is very similar in material from Gangca, Maduo and Nam Tso (S Tibet 21.VII.10, S Namtso lake 4750m, banks, 30°37'03"N, 90°43'30"E, leg. Joachim Schmidt) with slight differences (less than 1.6% overall) which correspond with geographical distance between the populations (Fig. 4), and show a considerably larger separation from any other Boreonectes species for which there are molecular data.

Figure 4.

Map of the Tibetan Plateau showing B. emmerichi localities (◆). Localities from which specimens giving chromosome preparations were obtained indicated by exclamation mark (!). Scale line = 500 km.

Mitotic chromosomes, arranged as karyotypes, are shown in Fig. 5m–r, and meiotic chromosomes in Fig. 6. There are 26 pairs of autosomes and the sex chromosomes are X0 (♂), XX (♀). This karyotype closely resembles that of B. macedonicus (Fig. 5s), but autosome 12 appears slightly more evenly metacentric and autosome 26 appears more or less the same size as pairs 24 and 25, as against clearly smaller than these pairs in B. macedonicus. The X chromosome is shown as an unpaired submetacentric in the C-banded first metaphase of meiosis shown in Fig. 6a. In the mitotic karyotypes the X chromosome appears about the same size as autosome 1 (longer than autosome 1 in B. macedonicus) but in second metaphase of meiosis (Fig. 6c) it appears longer. These are difficult karyotypes to work with. The chromosomes appear very condensed in the few successful preparations obtained, and the C-banding is not very good. Nevertheless, these karyotypes are sufficient to show that this Tibetan material has its own characteristic karyotype, and the differences in the relative lengths of autosomes 24, 25 and 26 when compared with those of B. macedonicus are sufficient to demonstrate that there has been translocation of material between different autosomes, indicating that these are indeed different species.

Figure 5.

Mitotic chromosomes of Boreonectes spp., arranged as karyotypes. a–d B. griseostriatus a, b Sweden (from Dutton, Angus (2007)) c, d Mt Cenis e–h B. g. strandi, Teriberka i–l B. multilineatus i, j Scotland (from Dutton, Angus (2007)) k, l Lac d’Anapéou m–r B. emmerichi m, n from mid-gut, Maduo o–r from testis, Gangca Dasi s B. macedonicus, Crno Ezero, Macedonia (from Angus (2008)) t, u B. ibericus t Peña Lara (from Dutton, Angus (2007)) u Lagos de Lloroza. b, d, f, h, j, l, n, p, r C-banded, the rest plain, Giemsa-stained. Missing chromosomes indicated by asterisks (*). Scale line = 5 μm.

Figure 6.

Meiotic chromosomes of B. emmerichi from Gangca Dasi. a metaphase I, C-banded b, c metaphase II plain, Giemsa-stained b male-determining nucleus with 26 chromosomes c female-determining nucleus with 27 chromosomes including X. Scale line = 5 μm.

B. griseostriatus griseostriatus (De Geer, 1774)

Mitotic chromosomes of a Mt Cenis specimen, arranged as a karyotype are shown in Fig. 5c (plain, Giemsa stained) and d (C-banded), while Fig. 5a, b shows Swedish material for comparison. Although two chromosomes are missing from the Mt Cenis karyotype (positions marked with asterisks (*) in the figure), the forms of the remaining chromosomes make it clear that this is indeed B. griseostriatus. The localities in the western Alps from which Boreonectes populations yielding karyotypes have been obtained are shown in Fig. 7. The presence of B. griseostriatus in the Mt Cenis area suggests that the range of B. alpestris (Dutton & Angus, 2007) (nearest locality: Italy, Colle del Nivolet in the Gran Paradiso (Angus 2010b)) may not extend into France.

Figure 7.

Map of the western Alps showing the sources of populations of B. griseostriatus and relatives from which chromosome data were obtained. Symbols: * griseostriatusalpestrisibericusinexpectatus. New data indicated by exclamation mark (!).

B. griseostriatus strandi (Brinck, 1943)

Mitotic chromosomes of a Teriberka specimen, arranged as karyotypes, are shown in Fig. 5e, g (plain, Giemsa stained) and Fig. 5f, h (C-banded). The karyotype shown in Fig. 5g, h lacks one replicate of autosome 29 but is included as the form of the chromosomes is particularly clear. As expected of B. g. strandi, the chromosomes show no differences from those of typical B. griseostriatus (Fig. 5a–d). The distinguishing feature of B. g. strandi is its size. Angus (2009) gave the size range of Norwegian strandi as 4.6–5.2 mm (♂), 4.6–5.3 mm (♀) and Brinck gave the size range of strandi (both sexes) as 4.8–5.5 mm as against 4.0–4.8 mm for normal griseostriatus. The size range of the Teriberka material is 5.0–5.1 mm (♂), 4.9–5.2 mm (♀), clearly strandi.

The localities from which populations of B. g. strandi yielding karyotypes have been obtained are shown in Fig. 8. The most easterly published record of B. g. strandi is from near Murmansk (Brinck 1943, Lindberg 1930), about 70 km west of Teriberka.

Figure 8.

Map showing the localities of B. g. strandi populations from which chromosome data were obtained (*). New record indicated by exclamation mark (!).

It should be noted that Nilsson and Hájek (2015) list strandi as a straight synonym of griseostriatus. Here we follow Brinck (1943) in regarding it as a subspecies in view of its larger size and restricted geographical distribution.

B. multilineatus (Falkenström, 1922)

Mitotic chromosomes of a specimen from the Lac d’Anapéou, arranged as karyotypes, are shown in Fig. 5k (plain, Giemsa stained) and Fig. 5l (C-banded). The arrangement of the chromosomes is the same as in Scottish B. multilineatus (Fig. 5i, j). The Pyrenean localities for B. multilineatus are shown in Fig. 9. Lac d’Anapéou is only about 25 km west of the previous locality from which it was recorded in the Pyrenees, Lac d’Oncet (Angus 2010b) but is on a different spur of the Pyrenees. Both of these localities are on the French side of the west-central Pyrenees. At the moment B. ibericus has not been found in the Pyrenees, but it may be expected to occur there as its range extends to the Alpes Maritimes (Dutton and Angus 2007).

Figure 9.

Map showing the localities of B. multilineatus populations in the Pyrenees (+), and of B. ibericus populations in the Picos de Europa area (◆), from which chromosome data were obtained. New data indicated by exclamation mark (!).

B. ibericus (Dutton & Angus, 2007)

An unbanded, Giemsa stained karyotype from a Lagos de Lloroza specimen is shown in Fig. 5u, while Fig. 5t shows one from a Peña Lara specimen. The Lloroza specimen is homozygous for the long (fused) form of autosome 1 and thus lacks any free autosome 24, while the Peña Lara specimen is heterozygous for the fusion and has one replicate of autosome 24. The Lagos de Lloroza (Fig. 9) are about 70 km further east than the Puerto de los Señales locality from where Dutton and Angus (2007) recorded B. ibericus, thus extending its known northern Spanish range a little closer to the Pyrenees.


This work has been supported by research facilities in the Natural History Museum, London, the School of Biological Sciences of Royal Holloway University of London, the Biology and Geography School of Qinghai Normal University in Xining, the Institute of Entomology of the Life Science School of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou and the Biomedical Imaging Unit of Southampton General Hospital, all of whom we thank for their support. We also thank Ignacio Ribera for permission to use his unpublished DNA data on B. emmerichi and related species, Franck Bameul and Pyotr Petrov for collecting Pyrenean B. multilineatus and Kola Peninsula B. griseostriatus strandi, and Tomasz Goral for the SEM pictures taken in the Natural History Museum, London. We thank Martin Fikácek for the map of the Tibetan Plateau used as the template for Fig. 4, Lucia Labrada and Carlos Luque for the map used as a template for Fig. 9, and Hans Fery for his detailed and very helpful referee’s comments on the taxonomic part of this paper.


  • Angus RB (2009) Northern exposure or with bus-pass to the pole. Latissimus 26: 13–16.
  • Angus RB (2010a) A third karyosystematic investigation of the Stictotarsus griseostriatus (De Geer) group of sibling species (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Comparative Cytogenetics 4: 13–20. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v4i1.27
  • Angus RB (2010b) Boreonectes gen. n. a new genus for the Stictotarsus griseostriatus (De Geer) group of sibling species (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), with additional karyosystematic data on the group. Comparative Cytogenetics 4: 123–131. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v4i2.46
  • Angus RB (2013) On the roof of the world–wanderings of an old foreigner. Latissimus 34: 5–12.
  • Brinck P (1943) Beitrag zur Kenntnis einiger kritischer Wasserkäfer-Arten. Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift 6: 140–153.
  • Falkenström G (1922) Stockholmstraktens vattencoleoptera. Entomologisk Tidsskrift 43: 10–32.
  • Falkenström G (1936) Halipliden, Dytisciden und Gyriniden aus West- und Zentral-China. Lingnan Science Journal 15(1): 79–99.
  • Helliesen T (1890) Bidrag til kundskaben om Norges coleopterfauna. Stavanger Museums Aarsberetning 1: 7–33.
  • Jia FL, Zhao S, Fery H (2012) Hydroporus sejilashan sp. n., a new diving beetle of the acutangulus-complex from Xizang, China (Qinghai-Tibet Plateau), and notes on other taxa of the genus (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae). Zootaxa 3223: 55–67.
  • Lindberg H (1930) Über die Art Deronectes griseostriatus De G. und ihre Verwandten. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 6: 55–60.
  • Shirt DB, Angus RB (1992) A revision of the Nearctic water beetles related to Potamonectes depressus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 46(2): 109–141.
  • Zaitzev FA (1953) Fauna SSSR Nasekomye zhestkokrylye 4. Plavunsovye i vertyachki. ANSSSR, Moskva-Leningrad. [In Russian English translation: 1972, Israel Program for Scientific Translation. Jerusalem]