Research Article
Print
Research Article
Cytogenetic study of heptapterids (Teleostei, Siluriformes) with particular respect to the Nemuroglanis subclade
expand article infoDaniel Luis Zanella Kantek‡, Wellington Adriano Moreira Peres§, Orlando Moreira-Filho|
‡ ICMBio, Cáceres, Brazil
§ ICMBio, Luiz Alves, Brazil
| UFSCAR, São Carlos, Brazil

Corresponding author: Daniel Kantek ( daniel_kantek@hotmail.com )

Academic editor: Rafael Noleto
© 2015 Daniel Kantek, Wellington Adriano Moreira Peres, Orlando Moreira-Filho.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Kantek DLZ, Peres WAM, Moreira-Filho O (2015) Cytogenetic study of heptapterids (Teleostei, Siluriformes) with particular respect to the Nemuroglanis subclade. Comparative Cytogenetics 9(1): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i1.8488
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C02C43E-8F05-45E1-87EA-5F676F348AF2
Open Access

Abstract

The catfish family Heptapteridae (order Siluriformes) is endemic to the Neotropics and is one of the most common of the fish families in small bodies of water. Although over 200 species have been identified in this family, very few have been characterized cytogenetically. Here, we analyze the chromosome genomes of four species of Heptapteridae: Cetopsorhamdia iheringi (Schubart & Gomes, 1959), 2n = 58, comprising 28 metacentric (m) + 26 submetacentric (sm) + 4 subtelomeric (st) chromosomes; Pimelodella vittata (Lütken, 1874), 2n = 46, comprising 16m + 22sm + 8st; Rhamdia prope quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824), 2n = 58 comprising 26m + 16sm + 14st + 2 acrocentric; and Rhamdiopsis prope microcephala (Lütken, 1874), 2n = 56, comprising 12m + 30sm + 14st. The nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) were located in a single chromosome pair in all species. The two species that belonged to the subclade Nemuroglanis, C. iheringi and R. prope quelen, had a diploid chromosome number of 58 and an interstitial NOR adjacent to a C+ block located on one of the larger chromosome pairs in the complement. Our results from conventional cytogenetic techniques in combination with FISH using 18S and 5S rDNA probes corroborated the taxonomical hypothesis for the formation of the Nemuroglanis subclade.

Keywords

Siluriformes , Heptapteridae , chromosomes, 5S and 18S rDNA, cytotaxonomy

Introduction

In recent years, various classification changes have led to the current taxonomic status of the catfish family Heptapteridae. Lundberg et al. (1991a, b) suggested the division of the family Pimelodidae into the subfamilies Pimelodinae, Pseudopimelodinae, and Rhamdiinae. Subsequently, on the basis of phylogenetic studies in the Siluriformes, Pinna (1998) elevated the subfamily Rhamdiinae to the level of a family, Rhamdiidae. Bockmann and Guazzelli (2003) later established the family Heptapteridae instead of Rhamdiidae; this family includes 24 genera and 189 valid species (Ferraris 2007) of small fish, commonly known as “bagres” or “mandis”. These fish are characterized by a long adipose fin, three pairs of barbels, an elongated body, and a grayish body color. They are endemic to the Neotropics and have a wide distribution in the water courses of Central and South America, with many species distributed in areas of ichthyological endemism. They live on the bottom of small and medium rivers, at low to medium depths, and are usually solitary with nocturnal habits (Bockmann and Guazelli 2003).

Subclades of Rhamdiinae (= Heptapteridae) have been identified in phylogenetic analyses of morphological data (Ferraris 1988, Lundberg et al. 1991a, Bockmann 1994): Rhamdia (Bleeker, 1858) and Pimelodella (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1888) are assigned to a basal group; while Cetopsorhamdia (Eigenmann & Fisher, 1916) and Rhamdiopsis (Haseman, 1911) have been placed in the Nemuroglanis subclade.

The diploid chromosome number in the Heptapteridae varies from 2n = 42 in Imparfinis hollandi (Haseman, 1911) (Margarido and Moreira-Filho 2008) to 2n = 58 in many other species. The latter chromosome number is the most frequent and is also considered a plesiomorphic character (Swarça et al. 2007, Borba et al. 2011). The karyotypes of heptapterid species comprise mainly metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes (see below) suggesting that pericentric inversions were more frequent than centric fissions in the evolution of the family. Nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) are usually present on one chromosome pair, and may be terminal or interstitial. These data suggest that extensive chromosomal rearrangements were involved in speciation within this group (Swarca et al. 2007). The reduction in diploid number may have been produced by successive chromosome fusions with deletions and inversions, such as those responsible for NOR position variation among species. B chromosomes are present in some species and are considered to be of recent origin, and without phylogenetic implications (Borba et al. 2011).

The presence of an interstitial NOR, which is usually located on the largest chromosome pair of the complement and adjacent to a C+ block, and the predominance of 2n = 58, are all cytogenetic characters strongly associated with the Nemuroglanis subclade (Kantek et al. 2009).

As there have been relatively few cytogenetic studies in the Heptapteridae, and because of the need to obtain further data to substantiate proposals on the cytotaxonomy of the family (Borba et al. 2011), the present study was undertaken to provide the first analysis, to our knowledge, of the karyotype of Pimelodella vittata (Lütken, 1874). We also used various cytological methods to analyze three other heptapterid species and compared the new data with those previously published to examine the cytotaxonomy of this family.

Material and methods

Specimens of four heptapterid species were collected from the Minhocas stream (S20°31'55.2", W046°02'42.1"), a tributary of the Piumhi river (Minas Gerais state): nine (seven males and two females) Cetopsorhamdia iheringi (Schubart & Gomes, 1959) (MNRJ 31477); six (five males and one female) P. vittata (MNRJ 29330); 10 (five males, four females and one of an undetermined sex) Rhamdia prope quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824) (MNRJ 29329, MNRJ 29326); and 18 (eight males, seven females and three of undetermined sex) of Rhamdiopsis prope microcephala (Lütken, 1874) (MNRJ 29325).

Mitotic metaphase preparations were made as described by Bertollo et al. (1978). Chromosome morphologies were assigned using the arm size ratio criteria proposed by Levan et al. (1964). Heterochromatin was identified by C-banding (Sumner 1972) and NORs were detected by silver nitrate staining (Howell and Black 1980). Metaphase preparations analyzed after conventional staining (Giemsa) were also subjected to C-banding, allowing the assemblage of sequential karyotypes.

The 18S and 5S rDNA sites on the chromosomes were located by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique (Pinkel et al. 1986), with a stringency of 77%, using probes obtained from Prochilodus argenteus (Agassis, 1829) (Hatanaka and Galetti Jr 2004) and Leporinus elongatus (Valenciennes, 1850) (Martins and Galetti Jr 2001), respectively. The two probes were labeled with 14-dATP-biotin through nick translation in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Bionick Labelling System, Invitrogen). Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (0.2 mg/ml) and analyzed using an Olympus BX50 epifluorescence microscope. Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics) was used for image capture.

Results

Cetopsorhamdia iheringi

Cells from all C. iheringi specimens had 2n = 58 and a karyotypic formula of 28 metacentric (m), 26 submetacentric (sm) and 4 subtelocentric (st) chromosomes (Fig. 1a), with no evidence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Silver staining showed that the NOR was located interstitially on the short arm of pair 1, and formed a secondary constriction (Fig. 1a box). Constitutive heterochromatin was present in the pericentromeric regions of several chromosome pairs (Fig. 1b) in addition to visible C+ blocks in the NOR-bearing pair (Fig. 1a, b).

Figure 1.

Karyotypes of Cetopsorhamdia iheringi (a, b) and Pimelodella vittata (c, d) after sequential Giemsa staining (a, c), C- banding (b, d) and Ag-NOR staining (boxes). Bar = 10 µm.

FISH with the 18S rDNA probe confirmed that the NOR was located interstitially on the short arm of pair 1 (Fig. 4a). FISH using the 5S ribosomal probe revealed the existence of a large number of these sequences on the NOR-bearing chromosomes, covering a large part of the chromosomes above and below the 18S ribosomal sites. There was synteny between the 18S and 5S rDNAs (Fig. 4b, c).

Pimelodella vittata

All cells from P. vittata specimens had 2n = 46 and a karyotypic formula of 16m, 22sm and 8st chromosomes (Fig. 1c), with no evidence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Silver staining located the NORs to the terminal region of the short arm of pair 17, where they formed a secondary constriction (Fig. 1c box). It was possible to see weak C+ bands close to the centromeres in some chromosomes (Fig. 1d).

FISH using the 18S rDNA probe confirmed the NOR location (Fig. 4d). Only one 5S rDNA locus was present in P. vittata in the terminal region of a submetacentric/subtelocentric chromosome pair (Fig. 4e). The 18S and 5S rDNA loci were not on the same pair of chromosomes (Fig. 4e, f).

Rhamdia prope quelen

Cells from all specimens, apart from one, had 2n = 58 and a karyotypic formula of 26m, 16sm, 14st and 2 acrocentric chromosomes (Fig. 2a), with no evidence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. One triploid specimen with 3n = 87 was found (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Karyotypes of Rhamdia prope quelen (a, b) and Rhamdiopsis prope microcephala (c, d) after sequential Giemsa staining (a, c), C- banding (b, d) and Ag-NOR staining (boxes). Bar = 10 µm.

Figure 3.

Metaphase of the triploid specimen of Rhamdia prope quelen. Bar = 10 µm.

Silver staining indicated the NOR was located in the terminal region of chromosome pair 10, where it formed a secondary constriction (Fig. 2a box). The chromosomes did not show any heterochromatic segments (Fig. 2b).

FISH using the 18S rDNA probe hybridized to the same region as the Ag-NOR (Fig. 5a, c). Only one 5S rDNA locus was identified; this was located at an interstitial position on a submetacentric chromosome pair (Fig. 5b, d).

Figure 4.

Metaphases of Cetopsorhamdia iheringi (a, b, c) and Pimelodella vittata (d, e, f) subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with an 18S rDNA probe (a, d) and 5S rDNA (b, e). The metaphases shown after Ag-NOR staining (c, f) are the same as those used for 5S FISH. Bar =10 µm.

Figure 5.

Metaphases of Rhamdia prope quelen (a, b, c, d) and Rhamdiopsis prope microcephala (e, f) subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization with an 18S rDNA probe (a, c, e) and 5S rDNA (b, d, f). Metaphases c and d belong to the triploid specimen. Bar =10 µm.

Rhamdiopsis prope microcephala

Cells from all specimens had 2n = 56 and a karyotypic formula of 12m, 30sm and 14st chromosomes (Fig. 2c), with no evidence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Silver staining indicated the NOR was located in an interstitial region of chromosome pair 16, where it formed a secondary constriction (Fig. 2c box). Constitutive heterochromatin was present in the pericentromeric regions of several chromosome pairs (Fig. 2d).

FISH using the 18S rDNA probe hybridized to the same region as the Ag-NOR (Fig. 5e). Two 5S rDNA loci were identified at a terminal position on a submetacentric/subtelocentric chromosome pair (Fig. 5f).

Discussion

The diploid chromosome number of 58 in C. iheringi and R. prope quelen is the most common karyotype number in the family Heptapteridae (Fenocchio and Bertollo 1990, Vissotto et al. 1999, Vissotto et al. 2001, Stolf et al. 2004, Kantek et al. 2009, Borba et al. 2011). The karyotype of 2n = 46 observed here in P. vittata is the same as reported for some other Pimelodella spp. (Dias and Foresti 1993, Vasconcelos and Martins-Santos 2000, Garcia and Almeida-Toledo 2010), P. avanhandavae (Eigenmann, 1917) (Vissoto et al. 1999), P. meeki (Eigenmann, 1910) (Vidotto et al. 2004, Garcia and Almeida-Toledo 2010, Borba et al. 2011, Gouveia et al. 2012), P. boschmai (Van der Stigchal, 1964) (Garcia and de Almeida-Toledo 2010) and P. gracilis (Valenciennes, 1836) (Garcia and de Almeida-Toledo 2010). Other Pimelodella species have different diploid chromosome numbers (Vasconcelos and Martins-Santos 2000, Swarça et al. 2003, Garcia and de Almeida-Toledo 2010).

The identification of a triploid specimen (3n = 87) in R. prope quelen is not unusual; indeed, three other cases have already been reported for Rhamdia (Swarça et al. 2007, Tsuda et al. 2010). The fertilization of a non-reduced (diploid) gamete by a reduced (haploid) gamete, such as an ovule (2n) by a sperm (n), is the most probable origin of these specimens (Morelli et al. 1983, Kantek et al. 2007).

The Nemuroglanis subclade is characterized by the presence of an interstitial NOR adjacent to a C+ block and the predominance of 2n = 58; these characteristics are present in the analyzed species from the genus Cetopsorhamdia (Vissoto et al. 1999 and present study), Taunayia bifaciata (Eigenmann & Norris, 1900) (Borba et al. 2011) and in five species of the genus Imparfinis (Eigenmann & Norris, 1900) (Kantek et al. 2009, Borba et al. 2011, Gouveia et al. 2012). If 2n = 58 is a plesiomorphic trait of the Heptapteridae family (Borba et al. 2011), then the reduction to 2n = 56 might indicate synapomorphy, grouping I. prope piperatus (Vissoto et al. 2001, Fenocchio et al. 2003), R. prope microcephala (present study) and R. microcephala (Lütken, 1874) (Fonseca et al. 2003). The hypothesis is supported by the presence of an interstitial NOR located on chromosomes that are not metacentric and not the largest in the karyotype of these species. The species Phenacorhamdia tenebrosa (Schubart, 1964), which belongs to the Nemuroglanis subclade, also has 2n = 58 (Borba et al. 2011), but no interstitial NOR. Since 2n = 58 is considered the basal number for Heptapteridae (Fenocchio et al. 2003, Borba et al. 2011), and the species Imparfinis borodini (Mees & Cala, 1989) (Vissoto et al. 1999), I. hollandi (Margarido and Moreira-Filho 2008) and Heptapterus mustelinus (Valenciennes, 1835) (Yano and Margarido 2012) have a reduced diploid number (2n = 52, 2n = 42 and 2n = 54, respectively), it is possible that Robertsonian translocations were responsible for the karyotypic changes.

The C-banding and Ag-NOR patterns of Rhamdia and Pimelodella species (Swarça et al. 2007, Borba et al. 2011, Gouveia et al. 2012) are distinctly different from most taxa of the Nemuroglanis subclade that have been analyzed. The existence of cytogenetic characteristics that separate the recognized groups of Heptapteridae was initially proposed by Fenocchio et al. (2003). Thus, for example, the interstitial C+ band pattern is a more common feature of species of the Nemuroglanis subclade, such as C. iheringi and R. prope microcephala (Fig. 1b, 2d, respectively). Other species of the family Heptapteridae that do not belong to this subclade, such as P. vittata (Fig. 1d) and R. prope quelen (Fig. 2b), have different patterns of heterochromatin distribution (Swarça et al. 2007, Garcia et al. 2010, Garcia and Almeida-Toledo 2010). However, as the majority of heptapterid species have not been studied cytogenetically studied, then it is difficult to elaborate broader proposals.

Another cytogenetic characteristic that may be diagnostic of the Nemuroglanis subclade is the synteny between 18S and 5S rDNA. Up until now, only Imparfinis schubarti (Gomes, 1956) (Kantek et al. 2009) and C. iheringi (present study) have been found to show this characteristic. Other genera in the Heptapteridae that do not belong to the Nemuroglanis subclade, such as Pimelodella and Rhamdia (Garcia et al. 2003, Garcia et al. 2010, present study), do not show this synteny. However, as R. prope microcephala did not have this characteristic, then the association between 5S and 18S rDNA might be a synapomorphy, shared by the group of species in the Nemuroglanis subclade that have a 2n = 58 karyotype and possess interstitial NORs on the largest chromosome pair of the complement.

The 5S ribosomal gene consists of multiple copies of a highly conserved 150 base pair sequence, separated by highly variable non-transcribed spacers (Williams and Strobeck 1985). These variable sequences, which were caused by insertions/deletions, mini-repetitions and pseudogenes, are useful for evolutionary studies and serve as population markers for many organisms, including plants (Zanke et al. 1995), mammals (Suzuki et al. 1994) and fishes (Martins et al. 2002). Variations in these spacers have also been detected in some neotropical fishes, such as Leporinus (Martins and Galetti Jr 2001) and Brycon (Wasko et al. 2001). A comparison of the outcome of analysis of I. schubarti (Kantek et al. 2009) and C. iheringi indicates that despite the relative evolutionary proximity of the species (both belong to the Nemuroglanis clade), and the likely localization of these sequences to homeologous chromosomes, there is nevertheless considerable differences in the signals obtained with the 5S rDNA probe. The large 5S rDNA blocks on C. iheringi chromosomes presumably originated through duplication of the 5S rDNA of an ancestral species close to these taxa. Other species of heptapterids considered more basal in the family, such as species belonging to the genera Rhamdia and Pimelodella, have only small 5S rDNA signals; this suggests that the presence of the large 5S rDNA block in C. iheringi is an apomorphic character. Based on the supposed homogeneity among 5S rDNA repeats, several studies have proposed that 5S rDNA is subject to concerted evolution (Arnheim 1983), where duplicated gene family members evolve as a single unit that undergoes a high degree of homogenization (as a unit in concert) (Pinhal et al. 2011).

Prior to this study, variability in the number and location of 5S ribosomal genes has been reported among Siluriformes (Kavalko et al. 2004) except for Rhamdia (Garcia et al. 2010). The analyses here confirm the variability observed by other authors, and also the conservation of 5S rDNA in Rhamdia.

Until now, only the genera Imparfinis, Cetopsorhamdia, Heptapterus, Phenacorhamdia, Rhamdiopsis, Pimelodella, Rhamdia, and Taunayia had been cytogenetically analyzed; these represent only eight of the 24 genera in the family Heptapteridae (Yano and Margarido 2012). The first five belong to the subclade Nemuroglanis. More studies involving this family may assist in the elucidation of cytotaxonomy and chromosome evolution in this family.

References

  • Arnheim N (1983) Concerted evolution of multigene families. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (Eds) Evolution of genes and proteins. Sunderland, Sinauer, 38–61.
  • Bertollo LAC, Takahashi CS, Moreira-Filho O (1978) Cytotaxonomic consideration on Hoplias lacerdae (Pisces, Erythrinidae). Brazilian Journal of Genetics 1: 103–120.
  • Bockmann FA (1994) Description of Mastiglanis asopos, a new pimelodid catfish from northern Brazil, with comments on phylogenetic relationships inside the subfamily Rhamdiinae (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Proceedings of the Biologial Society of Washington 107: 760–777. doi: 10.1643/CI-04-019R1
  • Bockmann FA, Guazzeli GM (2003) Family Heptapteridae (Heptapterids). In: Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJJr (Eds) Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, 406–431.
  • Borba RS, Silva EL, Pacheco ACS, Parisi-Maltempi PP, Alves AL (2011) Trends in the karyotypic evolution of the Neotropical catfish family Heptapteridae Bockmann 1998 (Teleostei: Siluriformes). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22: 509–518. doi: 10.1007/s11160-011-9245-3
  • Dias AL, Foresti F (1993) Cytogenetic studies on fishes of the family Pimelodidae (Siluroidei). Brazilian Journal of Genetics 16: 585–600. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572000000300015
  • Fenocchio AS, Bertollo LAC (1990) . Supernumerary chromosomes in a Rhamdia hilarii population (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Genetica 81: 193–198. doi: 10.1007/BF00360864
  • Fenocchio AS, Bertollo LAC, Takahashi CS, Dias AL, Swarça AC (2003) Cytogenetic studies and correlated considerations on Rhamdiinae relationships (Pisces, Siluroidei, Pimelodidae). Cytologia 68: 363–368. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.68.363
  • Ferraris Jr CJ (1988) Relationships of the neotropical catfish genus Nemuroglanis, with a description of a new species (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Proceedings of the Biologial Society of Washington 101: 509–516.
  • Ferraris Jr CJ (2007) Checklist of catfishes, recent and fossil (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes), and catalogue of siluriform primary types. Zootaxa 1418: 1–628.
  • Fonseca YM, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Maistro EL (2003) First cytogenetic description of the species Rhamdela microcephala (Pisces, Heptapteridae). Cytologia 68: 31–34. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.68.31
  • Garcia C, Almeida-Toledo LF (2010) Comparative chromosomal analyses in species of the genus Pimelodella (Siluriformes, Heptapteridae): occurrence of structural and numerical polymorphisms. Caryologia 63: 32–40. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2010.10589706
  • Garcia C, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC, Centofante L (2003) B chromosomes and natural triploidy in Rhamdia sp. (Pisces, Siluriformes, Heptapteridae). Cytologia 68: 403–411. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.68.403
  • Garcia C, Oliveira C, Almeida-Toledo LF (2010) Karyotypic evolution trends in Rhamdia quelen (Siluriformes, Heptapteridae) with considerations about the origin and differentiation of its supernumerary chromosomes. Genetics and Molecular Research 9: 365–384. doi: 10.4238/vol9-1gmr750
  • Gouveia JG, Moraes VPO, Sampaio TR, da Rosa R, Dias AL (2012) Considerations on karyotype evolution in the genera Imparfinis Eigenmann and Norris 1900 and Pimelodella Eigenmann and Eigenmann 1888 (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 23: 215–227. doi: 10.1007/s11160-012-9286-2
  • Hatanaka TE, Galetti Jr PM (2004) Mapping of the 18S and 5S ribosomal RNA genes in the fish Prochilodus argenteus, Agassiz, 1829 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Genetica 122: 239–244. doi: 10.1007/s10709-004-2039-y
  • Howell WM, Black DA (1980) Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia36: 1014–1915. doi: 10.1007/BF01953855
  • Kantek DLZ, Noleto RB, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM (2007) Cytotaxonomy, heterochromatic polymorphism and natural triploidy of a species of Astyanax (Pisces, Characidae) endemic to the Iguaçu River Basin. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 50: 67–74. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132007000500007
  • Kantek DLZ, Peres WAM, Buckup PA, Moreira-Filho O (2009) Cytogenetics of Imparfinis schubarti (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae) from the Piumhi drainage, a diverted river in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Zoologia 26: 733–738. doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702009000400018
  • Kavalco KF, Pazza R, Bertollo LAC, Moreira-Filho O (2004) Gene mapping of 5S rDNA sites in eight fish species from the Paraíba do Sul river Basin, Brazil. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 106: 107–110. doi: 10.1159/000078567
  • Lundberg JG, Bornbush AH, Mago-Leccio F (1991a) Gladioglanis conquistador n. sp. from Ecuador with Diagnoses of the Subfamilies Rhamdiinae Bleeker and Pseudopimelodinae n. subf. (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Copeia 1: 190–209. doi: 10.2307/1446263
  • Lundberg JG, Mago-Leccio F, Nass P (1991b) Exallondontus aguanai, a new genus and species of Pimelodidae (Pisces, Siluriformes) from the deep river channels of South America, and delimitation of the subfamily Pimelodidae. Proceedings of The Biological Society of Washington 104: 840–869.
  • Margarido VP, Moreira-Filho O (2008) Karyotypic differentiation through chromosome fusion and number reduction in Imparfinis hollandi (Ostariophysi, Heptapteridae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 31: 235–238. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572008000200012
  • Martins C, Galetti Jr PM (2001) Organization of 5S rDNA in species of the fish Leporinus: two different genomic locations are characterized by distinct nontranscribed spacers. Genome 44: 903–910. doi: 10.1139/gen-44-5-903
  • Martins C, Wasko AP, Oliveira C, Porto-Foresti F, Parise-Maltempi PP, Wright JM, Foresti F (2002) Dynamics of 5S rDNA in the tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) genome: Repeat units, enverted sequences, pseudogenes and chromosome loci. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 98: 78–85. doi: 10.1159/000068542
  • Morelli S, Bertollo LAC, Moreira-Filho O (1983) Cytogenetic considerations on the genus Astyanax (Pisces, Characidae) II. Occurrence of natural triploidy. Caryologia 36: 245–250. doi: 10.1080/00087114.1983.10797665
  • Pinhal D, Yoshimura TS, Araki CS, Martins C (2011) The 5S rDNA family evolves through concerted and birth-and-death evolution in fish genomes: an example from freshwater stingrays. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-151
  • Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 83: 2934–2938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2934
  • Pinna MC (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of neotropical siluriforms (Teleostei: Ostariophysi): historical overview and synthesis of hypotheses. In: Malabarba LR, Vari RE, Lucena ZM, Lucena CA (Eds) Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, 279–330.
  • Stolf R, Swarça AC, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL (2004) Analyses of karyotype and nucleolar organizer regions of Imparfinis aff. schubarti (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) of the Tibagi river basin, Paraná, Brazil. Caryologia 57: 348–352. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2004.10589415
  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75: 304–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90558-7
  • Suzuki H, Moriwaki K, Sakurai S (1994) Sequences and evolutionary analysis of mouse 5S r DNAs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 704–710.
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Dias AL (2007) An update Cytogenetic Review for Species of the Families Pseudopimelodidae, Pimelodidae and Heptapteridae (Pisces, Siluriformes). Sugestion of a Cytotaxonomical Classification. Caryologia 60: 334–348. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2007.10797957
  • Swarça AC, Vidotto AP, Dias AL (2003) Cytogenetic characterization of Pimelodella aff. avanhandavae (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from Tibagi River (Paraná State, Brazil). Caryologia 56: 421–425. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2007.10797957
  • Tsuda JR, de Moraes VPO, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL (2010) Occurrence of natural triploidy in Rhamdia quelen (Siluriformes, Heptapteridae). Genetics and Molecular Research 9: 1929–1935. doi: 10.4238/vol9-3gmr949
  • Vasconcelos C, Martins-Santos IC (2000) Chromosome polymorphism in species of the Pimelodidae family (Pisce, Siluriformes). Hereditas 132: 103–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2000.00103.x
  • Vidotto AP, Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Dias AL (2004) Cytogenetic studies in three Pimelodella meeki populations (Pisces, Pimelodidae) from Tibagi River Basin (Brazil). Journal of Heredity 95: 517–520. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esh075
  • Vissoto PC, Foresti F, Oliveira C (1999) Karyotype description of five species of Pimelodidae (Teleostei, Siluriformes). Chromosome Science 3: 1–7.
  • Vissotto PC, Foresti F, Oliveira C (2001) Karyotypic characterization of two species of the genus Imparfinis (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Heptapteridae). Chromosome Science 5: 97–103.
  • Yano CF, Margarido VP (2012) First cytogenetic studies of the genus Heptapterus (Actinopterygii, Siluriformes): karyotype differentiation and review of cytogenetic data on the Heptapteridae family. Journal of Fish Biology 81: 939–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03314.x
  • Wasko AP, Martins C, Wrigth JM, Galetti Jr PM (2001) Molecular organization of 5S rDNA in fishes of the genus Brycon. Genome 44: 893–902. doi: 10.1139/gen-44-5-893
  • Williams SM, Strobeck C (1985) Sister chromatid exchange and the evolution of rDNA spacer length. Journal of Theoretical Biology 116: 625–636. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80092-8
  • Zanke C, Borisjuk N, Ruoss B, Schilderentschler L (1995) A specific oligonucleotide of the 5S rDNA spacer anda species-specific elements identify symmetrical somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and S. pinnatisecum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 720–726. doi: 10.1007/BF00222139
login to comment