Research Articles
Print
Research Articles
Molecular cytogenetic studies in the ladybird beetle Henosepilachna argus Geoffroy, 1762 (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Epilachninae)
expand article infoPablo Mora, Jesús Vela, Olivia Sanllorente, Teresa Palomeque, Pedro Lorite Martínez
‡ Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

The ladybird Henosepilachna argus Geoffroy, 1762 has been cytogenetically studied. In addition we have conducted a review of chromosome numbers and the chromosomal system of sex determination available in the literature in species belonging to the genus Henosepilachna and in its closely related genus Epilachna. Chromosome number of H. argus was 2n=18, including the sex chromosome pair, a common diploid chromosome number within the tribe Epilachnini. The study of prophase I meiotic chromosomes showed the typical Xyp “parachute” bivalent as in the majority of species of Coccinellidae. C-banding and fluorescent staining with AT-specific DAPI fluorochrome dye have been carried out for the first time in H. argus. C-banding technique revealed that heterochromatic blocks are pericentromerically located and DAPI staining showed that this heterochromatin is AT rich.

Fluorescence in situ hybridizations using rDNA and the telomeric TTAGG sequence as probes have been carried out. FISH using rDNA showed that the nucleolar organizing region is located on the short arm of the X chromosome. FISH with the telomeric sequence revealed that in this species telomeres of chromosomes are composed of the pentanucleotide TTAGG repeats. This is the first study on the telomeric sequences in Coccinellidae.

Keywords

Henosepilachna argus, karyotype, C-banding, DAPI staining, NOR, telomeres

Introduction

Insects are one of the most diverse and biggest numerous groups of metazoans. This group contains almost one million of species, half a million of which are phytophagous. Most of those phytophagous insects are considered specialist feeding on one or few plant species (Schoonhoven et al. 2005). Henosepilachna argus Geoffroy, 1762 (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) the bryony ladybird is a phytophagous insect (both larvae and adults) which feeds on leaves of white bryony and other Cucurbitaceous plants, including melon or watermelon crops.

The tribe Epilachnini is included in the Epilachninae subfamily (Coccinellidae, Epilachninae) (Jadwiszczak and Wegrzynowicz 2003). Within Epilachnini, one of the most problematic questions is the distinctiveness of the genera Epilachna and Henosepilachna. Although both genera have been distinguished by morphological characters (Li 1993), that question is not fully elucidated. Recently Katoh et al. (2014) by using a combined dataset of NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) and the 28S rDNA reconstructed the phylogeny of 46 species of Epilachnini, including 16 species of Epilachna and 24 species of Henosepilachna. The results obtained by Katoh et al. (2014) suggest that Henosepilachna and Epilachna are polyphyletic but also the existence of some well-supported clades, such as Asian Epilachna, American Epilachna and Asian and Australian Henosepilachna. Despite this, Katoh et al. (2014) recommended that a new phylogenetic analysis has to be done, with special careful attention to both morphological and molecular analyses with a broad taxonomic representation. Thereby the taxonomy of the species belonging to the genus Henosepilachna remains unclear with misidentification for some species. Sometimes it is due to the existence of intraspecific variation which causes a wide variation in the external appearance and morphological characters presented by the species of this group (Naz et al. 2012).

In this paper a karyotype analysis, C-banding and fluorescent staining with the AT-specific DAPI fluorochrome dye have been carried out for the first time in Henosepilachna argus. In addition we have conducted a review of chromosome numbers and the chromosomal system of sex determination available in the literature in species belonging to the genera Henosepilachna and Epilachna. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations using rDNA and (TTAGG)n as probes have also been carried out for the first time in Epilachninae. This molecular cytogenetic study could be helpful in the future for solving the problem of distinctiveness of both genera.

Material and methods

Chromosome preparations, C-banding and DAPI staining

Chromosome spreads were obtained from adult male gonads according to the technique described by Lorite et al. (1996a). C-banding was performed as described by Sumner (1972) with some modifications (Palomeque et al. 2005). Staining of the chromosomes with 4’-6-diamino-2-fenil-indol (DAPI) was performed according to Schweizer (1980).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

The physical mapping of 18S and 28S rDNA loci was carried out by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH was performed as described previously (Lorite et al. 2002a, Palomeque et al. 2005). A plasmid containing the Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830 rDNA gene (pDmr.a 51#1) (Endow 1982) was used as probe. The telomeric DNA probe was generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the (TTAGG)6 and (TAACC)6 oligonucleotides as primers (Lorite et al. 2002b). Both probes were labeled with biotin-16-dUTP using the biotin labeling kit from Roche (final concentration of 2 ng/ml, 50% formamide). Fluorescence immunological detection was performed using the avidin-FITC/anti-avidin-biotin system with two rounds of amplification for the rDNA probe and four rounds of amplification for the telomeric probe. Slides were counterstained with propidium iodide and DAPI.

Results and discussion

Henosepilachna argus showed 8 pairs of autosomes and the sex chromosomes X and Y. The karyotype was composed of 6 pairs of metacentric (pairs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7) and 2 pairs of submetacentric autosomes (pairs 4 and 8). The chromosome X was submetacentric and the chromosome Y was minute and seems to be acrocentric (Figure 1A and C). We have conducted a review of chromosome numbers and chromosomal system of sex determination available in the literature in species belonging to the genera Henosepilachna and Epilachna (Table 1). A variable chromosome number was given for Henosepilachna dodecastigma Wiedemann, 1934 with a chromosome number ranging from 6 pairs of autosomes and the sex chromosome pair to 9 pairs of autosomes and the sex chromosome pair (review in Smith and Virkki 1978). However the results showed by Saha (1973) suggest that the 2n = 14 is the most probable chromosome number for this species. According to Sloggett and Honĕk (2012) the most common diploid chromosome number within Epilachnini was 18-20 (including the sex chromosome pair), as happens in Henosepilachna argus with a chromosome number of 2n=18.

Figure 1.

Metaphase plate and karyotype of Henosepilachna argus male. Giemsa staining (A, C) and C-banding (B, D). The arrows indicate the sex chromosomes (X and y).

Known chromosome numbers and chromosomal system of sex determination in species belonging to the genera Epilachna and Henosepilachna.

Epilachna
2n References
Epilachna admirabilis Crotch, 1874 18 Xy Tanaka and Sasaji (1992)
Epilachna borealis Fabricius, 1775 18 Xy Stevens (1906), Hoy (1918)
Epilachna cacica Guerín-Meneville, 1844 20 Xy Vidal (1984)
Epilachna dumerili Mulsant, 1850 16 Xy Yadav et al. (1991)
Epilachna obscurella Mulsant, 1850 18 Xy Gomez and Castorena (1972)
Epilachna paenulata Germar, 1824 18 Xy Drets et al. (1983)
Epilachna varivestris Mulsant, 1850 20 Xy Gomez and Castorena (1972)
Henosepilachna
Henosepilachna chrysomelina Fabricius, 1775 × capensis Thunberg, 1784 18 Strasburger (1936)
Henosepilachna dodecastigma Wiedemann, 1823 20 Xy Lahiri and Manna (1969)
12-14 Saha and Manna (1971)
14 Xy Saha (1973)
Henosepilachna niponica Lewis, 1896 20 Xy Yosida (1944), Tanaka and Sasaji (1992), Tsurusaki et al. (1993)
Henosepilachna orientalis Zimmerman, 1936 18 XY Agarwal (1961)
Henosepilachna pustulosa Kono 1937 20 Xy Yosida (1948), Tsurusaki et al. (1993)
Henosepilachna septima Dieke, 1947 20 Xy Kacker (1973)
Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata Motschulsky, 1857 20 Xy Yosida (1948), Takenouchi (1955), Tsurusaki et al. (1993)
Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata Fabricius, 1775 18 Xy; XY Bose (1948), Yosida (1948), Agarwal (1961), Yadav and Pillai (1979), Tanaka and Sasaji (1992), Kobayashi et al. (2000)
Henosepilachna yasutomii Katakura, 1981 20 Xy Tsurusaki et al. (1993)

Differential chromosomal staining is able to show some specific patterns helpful to distinguish chromosomes with the same size. C-banding reveals the constitutive heterochromatin (Sumner 1972). In Coccinellidae beetles the heterochromatin is associated with pericentromeric regions and shorts arms of chromosomes (Drets et al. 1983, Maffei et al. 2004, Rozek and Holecova 2002, among others). The application of C-banding techniques in Henosepilachna argus showed large heterochromatic pericentromeric blocks on all chromosomes. The small chromosome Y was almost entirely heterochromatic (Figure 1B and D). Similar results have been reported for other Epilachnini although only four species have been analyzed by C-banding methods (Drets et al. 1983, Tsurusaki et al. 1993).

The sex chromosomal system found in Henosepilachna argus is XX/Xyp (Figure 2). The y chromosome was minute and for this reason it is often written with lowercase letter. When X and y chromosomes were paired in meiosis, they resemble a “parachute”. The Xyp parachute system is considered the most common form of sex determination system in Coccinellidae family as well as in other families of Coleopteran insects (Smith and Virkki 1978, De Julio et al. 2010). However in some groups the Y chromosome has disappeared and the chromosomal system of sex determination changes to the X0 system (Angus et al. 2015).

Figure 2.

Giemsa staining of meiotic chromosomes at late pachytene (A) and in metaphase I (B). The arrows indicate the sex chromosomes (X and y).

Association of heterochromatic segments of all chromosome complement during early meiotic stages forming a single chromocenter has been described in Epilachna vigintioctopunctata Fabricius, 1775 (Bose 1948) and in Epilachna paenulata Germar, 1824 (Drets et al. 1983). This association has not been found in Henosepilachna argus (Figure 2) or any other species of Epilachnini, with the exception of the two previously commented species. However, associations of heterochromatic segments of non-homologous chromosomes in chromocenters have been described in others insects such as in Triatominae (Hemiptera) (Pita et al. 2014).

DAPI staining of mitotic chromosomes displayed similar results that C-banding technique with the pericentromeric chromosome regions intensely stained (Figure 3). Equally in meiotic metaphase I bivalents the pericentromeric regions were intensely stained. DAPI staining coincident with C-banding heterochromatic pericentromeric regions has also been found in some Coleoptera, suggesting that these heterochromatic regions are rich in AT base pairs although in other Coleoptera the DAPI staining of chromosomes did not reveal any positive signal (Karagyan et al. 2012, Da Silva et al. 2015 and references therein). This varied and different banding pattern could be due to the structure and composition of insect heterochromatin, especially in relation to the heterochromatin associated proteins (Lorite et al. 1996b).

Figure 3.

DAPI staining of mitotic metaphase (A) and meiotic metaphase I (B). The arrows indicate the sex chromosomes (X and y).

The FISH technique using rDNA showed a positive hybridization signal on the short arm of X chromosome (Figure 4). The localization of the nucleolar organizer region (NOR) is unknown in other species of Epilachnini. At this moment the chromosome location of the NOR in Coccinellidae is only known in two species, Olla v-nigrum Mulsant, 1866 and Cycloneda sanguinea Linnaeus, 1763 (Maffei et al. 2001, 2004) by Ag-NOR banding and FISH. The NOR location in both species is variable. In the first one the NOR region appears on the sex chromosomes (Maffei et al. 2001), nevertheless in the second one the NOR region appears on one pair of autosomes (Maffei et al. 2004). The variable location of the NORs has been observed in other Coleopteran families as Carabidae, Melolonthidae, Tenebrionidae or Scarabaeidae that show that rDNA sequences are located on the sex chromosomes, autosomes or both depending on the species (Oliveira et al. 2012, Arcanjo et al. 2013).

Figure 4.

(A) Four mitotic metaphase plates stained with DAPI, the X chromosomes were showed by arrows, and y chromosomes were showed by the arrowhead. (B) FISH using rDNA as probe. Positive hybridization signals on the short arm of X chromosomes were showed.

FISH showed that the TTAGG motif is present in the telomeres of the chromosomes of H. argus (Figure 5). The pentanucleic repetition TTAGG is considered the most common telomeric sequence in insects (Frydrychová et al. 2004). In spite of this, the DNA composition of coleopteran telomeres is very variable. Frydrychová and Marec (2002) studied the occurrence of (TTAGG)n repeats in the telomeres of 12 species of beetles, which represent the major lineages of the phylogenetic tree of the Coleoptera order. Furthermore, the presence or absence of (TTAGG)n repeats was independent of the phylogenetic relationships. For example, in the suborder Polyphaga six species showed positive results to TTAGG probe and three negative results. In addition in Tribolium castaneum Herbst, 1797 (Tenebrionidae) there has been a replacement from TTAGG repetition to TCAGG repetition (Richards et al. 2008). Mravinac et al. (2011) showed that the motif TCAGG is found in all the 19 examined species of three beetle families belonging to the superfamily Tenebrionoidea, whereas TTAGG the canonical telomeric motif of insects, is found in most but not in all of the remaining species covering four families, Cucujidae, Cerambycidae, Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae. The analysis of the genome of T. castaneum also showed that multiple telomeres are formed by TCAGG repetitions interrupted by full-length and truncated non-LTR (Long Terminal Repeats) retrotransposons. The authors also suggested that this type of telomeres should be a “middle” stage between the typical telomeres like in Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1761 (Hymenoptera) (Robertson and Gordon 2006) and telomeres which are exclusively formed by non-LTR as in Drosophila (Diptera) (review by Zhang and Rong 2012, among others).

Figure 5.

FISH using (TTAGG)n as probe on mitotic chromosomes (A) and selected chromosomes (B).

Thus, in this paper classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques have been performed on chromosomes of Henosepilachna argus. This is the first study on rDNA localization in Epilachninae. Besides, it is the first study of telomeric sequences in Coccinellidae family. This molecular cytogenetic study, in addition to expanding the knowledge of this species, could be helpful in the future for solving of the problem of distinctiveness between both genera

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Junta de Andalucía (through the programs “Ayudas a Grupos de Investigación”, Group BIO220 and “Incentivos a proyectos de investigación de excelencia”, project CVI-6807, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund) and by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación e Innovación (through project CGL2011-23841, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund).

References

  • Agarwal U (1961) Studies on the chromosomes of five species of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Cytologia 26: 285–293. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.26.285
  • Angus RB, Angus EM, Jia F, Chen Z, Zhang Y (2015) Further karyosystematic studies of the Boreonectes griseostriatus (De Geer) group of sibling species (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) –characterisation of B. emmerichi (Falkenström, 1936) and additional European data. Comparative Cytogenetics 9: 133–144. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i1.4463
  • Arcanjo A, Cabral-de-Mello DC, Martins C, de Moura RC, Souza MJ (2013) Chromosomal diversification of diploid number, heterochromatin and rDNAs in two species of Phanaeus beetles (Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 36: 341–346. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572013005000031
  • Bose I (1948) The association of non-homologous chromosomes in the spermatogenesis of the lady bird beetle, Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (Fab). Proceeding of the Zoological Society of Bengal 1: 131–140.
  • Da Silva AA, Braga LS, Guedes RNC, Tavares MG (2015) Cytogenetic analyses using C-banding and DAPI/CMA3 staining of four populations of the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Comparative Cytogenetics 9: 89–102. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i1.4611
  • De Julio M, Fernandes FR, Costa C, Almeida MC, Cella DM (2010) Mechanisms of karyotype differentiation in Cassidinae sensu lato (Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Chrysomelidae) based on seven species of the Brazilian fauna and an overview of the cytogenetic data. Micron 41: 26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2009.07.013
  • Drets ME, Corbella E, Panzera F, Folle GA (1983) C-banding and non-homologous association II. The “parachute” Xyp sex bivalent and the behaviour of heterochromatic segments in Epilachna paenulata. Chromosoma 88: 249–255. doi: 10.1007/BF00292901
  • Endow SA (1982) Polytenization of the ribosomal genes on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 100: 375–385.
  • Frydrychová R, Marec F (2002) Repeated losses of TTAGG telomere repeats in evolution of beetles (Coleoptera). Genetica 115: 179–87. doi: 10.1023/A:1020175912128
  • Frydrychová R, Grossmann P, Trubac P, Vitkova M, Marec F (2004) Phylogenetic distribution of TTAGG telomeric repeats in insects. Genome 47: 163–178. doi: 10.1139/g03-100
  • Gómez M, Castorena I (1972) Diferencias cromosómicas entre Epilachna varivestris y Epilachna obscurella. Folia entomológica mexicana 24: 97–98.
  • Hoy WE (1918) A study of somatic chromosomes II. The chromosomes in the embryos of Epilachna borealis and Diabrotica vittata. Biological Bulletin 35: 166–174. doi: 10.2307/1536275
  • Jadwiszczak AS, Wegrzynowicz P (2003) World catalogue of Coccinellidae. Part I - Epilachninae. Mantis Publishing, Olsztyn.
  • Kacker RK (1973) Studies on the chromosomes of Indian Coleoptera. V. On the cytology of Hoplobrachium asperipenne Fairm. (Tenebrionidae: Amarygminae), Epilachna septima Dieke (Coccinellidae: Epilachninae), and Caryedon gonagra (Fabr.) (Bruchidae: Bruchinae). Cytologia 38: 535–538.
  • Karagyan G, Lachowska D, Kalashian M (2012) Karyotype analysis of four jewel-beetle species (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) detected by standard staining, C-banding, AgNOR-banding and CMA3/DAPI staining. Comparative Cytogenetics 6: 183–197. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v6i2.2950
  • Katoh T, Koji S, Ishida TA, Matsubayashi KW, Kahono S, Kobayashi N, Furukawa K, Bui Tuan Viet, Vasconcellos-Neto J, Lange CN, Goergen G, Nakano S, Li NN, Yu G, Katakura H (2014) Phylogeny of Epilachna, Henosepilachna, and some minor genera of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellinae: Epilachnini), with an analysis of ancestral biogeography and host-plant utilization. Zoological Science 31: 820–830. doi: 10.2108/zs140088
  • Kobayashi N, Shirai Y, Tsurusaki N, Tamura K, Aotsuka T, Katakura H (2000) Two cryptic species of the phytophagous ladybird beetle Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) detected by analyses of mitochondrial DNA and karyotypes, and crossing experiments. Zoological Science 17: 1159–1166. doi: 10.2108/zsj.17.1159
  • Lahiri M, Manna GK (1969) Chromosome complement and meiosis in nine species of Coleoptera. Proceedings 56th Indian science Congress, Part 3: 448–449.
  • Li CS (1993) Review of the Australian Epilachninae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 32: 209–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1993.tb00577.x
  • Lorite P, Chica E, Palomeque T (1996a) Cytogenetic studies of ant Linepithema humile Shattuck (=Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr) in European population. Caryologia 49: 199–205. doi: 10.1080/00087114.1996.10797364
  • Lorite P, Chica E, Palomeque T (1996b) G-banding and chromosome condensation in the ant, Tapinoma nigerrimum. Chromosome Research 4: 77–79. doi: 10.1007/BF02254949
  • Lorite P, Carrillo JA, Garnería I, Petitpierre E, Palomeque T (2002a) Satellite DNA in the elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae): characterization, interpopulation analysis, and chromosome location. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 98: 302–307. doi: 10.1159/000071053
  • Lorite P, Carrillo JA, Palomeque T (2002b) Conservation of (TTAGG)n telomeric sequences among ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Journal of Heredity 93: 282–285. doi: 10.1093/jhered/93.4.282
  • Maffei EM, Pompolo SG, Campos LA, Petitpierre E (2001) Sequential FISH analysis with rDNA genes and Ag-NOR banding in the lady beetle Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Hereditas 135: 13–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00013.x
  • Maffei EM, Pompolo SG, Petitpierre E (2004) C-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA sequences in chromosomes of Cycloneda sanguinea Linnaeus (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 27: 191–195. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572004000200011
  • Mravinac B, Mestrovic N, Cavrak V, Plohl M (2011) TCAGG, an alternative telomeric sequence in insects. Chromosoma 120: 367–376. doi: 10.1007/s00412-011-0317-x
  • Naz F, Inayatullah MA, Rafi M, Ali A (2012) Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata (Fab.)(Epilachninae:Coccinellidae); its taxonomy, distribution and host plants in Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 28: 421–427.
  • Oliveira SG, Cabral-de-Mello DC, Arcanjo AP, Xavier C, Souza MJ, Martins C, Moura RC (2012) Heterochromatin, sex chromosomes and rRNA gene clusters in Coprophanaeus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 138: 46–55. doi: 10.1159/000339648
  • Palomeque T, Muñoz-López M, Carrillo JA, Lorite P (2005) Characterization and evolutionary dynamics of a complex family of satellite DNA in the leaf beetle Chrysolina carnifex (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Chromosome Research 13: 795–807. doi: 10.1007/s10577-005-1013-6
  • Pita S, Panzera F, Sánchez A, Panzera Y, Palomeque T, Lorite P (2014) Distribution and evolution of repeated sequences in genomes of Triatominae (Hemiptera-Reduviidae) inferred from genomic in situ hybridization. PLoS ONE 9(12): e114298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114298
  • Richards S, Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Brown SJ, Denell R, Beeman RW, Gibbs R, Beeman RW, Brown SJ, Bucher G, Friedrich M, Grimmelikhuijzen CJ, Klingler M, Lorenzen M, Richards S, Roth S, Schröder R, Tautz D, Zdobnov EM, Muzny D, Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Attaway T, Bell S, Buhay CJ, Chandrabose MN, Chavez D, Clerk-Blankenburg KP, Cree A, Dao M, Davis C, Chacko J, Dinh H, Dugan-Rocha S, Fowler G, Garner TT, Garnes J, Gnirke A, Hawes A, Hernandez J, Hines S, Holder M, Hume J, Jhangiani SN, Joshi V, Khan ZM, Jackson L, Kovar C, Kowis A, Lee S, Lewis LR, Margolis J, Morgan M, Nazareth LV, Nguyen N, Okwuonu G, Parker D, Richards S, Ruiz SJ, Santibanez J, Savard J, Scherer SE, Schneider B, Sodergren E, Tautz D, Vattahil S, Villasana D, White CS, Wright R, Park Y, Beeman RW, Lord J, Oppert B, Lorenzen M, Brown S, Wang L, Savard J, Tautz D, Richards S, Weinstock G, Gibbs RA, Liu Y, Worley K, Weinstock G, Elsik CG, Reese JT, Elhaik E, Landan G, Graur D, Arensburger P, Atkinson P, Beeman RW, Beidler J, Brown SJ, Demuth JP, Drury DW, Du YZ, Fujiwara H, Lorenzen M, Maselli V, Osanai M, Park Y, Robertson HM, Tu Z, Wang JJ, Wang S, Richards S, Song H, Zhang L, Sodergren E, Werner D, Stanke M, Morgenstern B, Solovyev V, Kosarev P, Brown G, Chen HC, Ermolaeva O, Hlavina W, Kapustin Y, Kiryutin B, Kitts P, Maglott D, Pruitt K, Sapojnikov V, Souvorov A, Mackey AJ, Waterhouse RM, Wyder S, Zdobnov EM, Zdobnov EM, Wyder S, Kriventseva EV, Kadowaki T, Bork P, Aranda M, Bao R, Beermann A, Berns N, Bolognesi R, Bonneton F, Bopp D, Brown SJ, Bucher G, Butts T, Chaumot A, Denell RE, Ferrier DE, Friedrich M, Gordon CM, Jindra M, Klingler M, Lan Q, Lattorff HM, Laudet V, von Levetsow C, Liu Z, Lutz R, Lynch JA, da Fonseca RN, Posnien N, Reuter R, Roth S, Savard J, Schinko JB, Schmitt C, Schoppmeier M, Schröder R, Shippy TD, Simonnet F, Marques-Souza H, Tautz D, Tomoyasu Y, Trauner J, Van der Zee M, Vervoort M, Wittkopp N, Wimmer EA, Yang X, Jones AK, Sattelle DB, Ebert PR, Nelson D, Scott JG, Beeman RW, Muthukrishnan S, Kramer KJ, Arakane Y, Beeman RW, Zhu Q, Hogenkamp D, Dixit R, Oppert B, Jiang H, Zou Z, Marshall J, Elpidina E, Vinokurov K, Oppert C, Zou Z, Evans J, Lu Z, Zhao P, Sumathipala N, Altincicek B, Vilcinskas A, Williams M, Hultmark D, Hetru C, Jiang H, Grimmelikhuijzen CJ, Hauser F, Cazzamali G, Williamson M, Park Y, Li B, Tanaka Y, Predel R, Neupert S, Schachtner J, Verleyen P, Raible F, Bork P, Friedrich M, Walden KK, Robertson HM, Angeli S, Forêt S, Bucher G, Schuetz S, Maleszka R, Wimmer EA, Beeman RW, Lorenzen M, Tomoyasu Y, Miller SC, Grossmann D, Bucher G (2008) The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. Nature 452: 949–955. doi: 10.1038/nature06784
  • Robertson HM, Gordon KH (2006) Canonical TTAGG-repeat telomeres and telomerase in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Genome Research 16: 1345–1351. doi: 10.1101/gr.5085606
  • Rozek M, Holecova M (2002) Chromosome numbers, C-banding patterns and sperm of some ladybird species from Central Europe (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Folia biologica (Krakow) 50: 17–21.
  • Saha AK (1973) Chromosomal studies of the Indian coleopterans (Indian beetles). Cytologia (Tokyo) 38: 363–373.
  • Saha AK, Manna GK (1971) Cytological investigation of Indian Coleopteran insects (Beetles). Proceeding of the 58th Indian Science Congress, Part IV: 20.
  • Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-Plant Biology, Ed 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Schweizer D (1980) Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 27: 190–193. doi: 10.1159/000131482
  • Sloggett J, Honĕk A (2012) Ecology and behaviour of the ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae). In: Hodek I, van Emden HF, Honěk A (Eds) Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Smith SG, Virkki N (1978) Animal Cytogenetics. 3. Insecta. 5. Coleoptera Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart.
  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75: 304–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90558-7
  • Stevens MN (1906) Studies in spermatogenesis II. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 86: 309–321.
  • Strasburger EH (1936) Über Störungen der Eientwicklung bei Kreuzungen von Epilachna chrysomelina F. mit Epilachna capensis Thunb. Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 71: 538–545.
  • Takenouchi Y (1955) Notes on cytology and hibridization in two puzzling species of Epilachna (Coccinellidae-Coleoptera). Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 28: 238–243.
  • Tanaka H, Sasaji H (1992) Karyotypes of twenty-seven species of the Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of Fukui prefecture. Entomological Journal of Fukui 11: 25–38.
  • Tsurusaki N, Nakano S, Katakura H (1993) Karyotypic differentiation in the phytophagous ladybird beetles Epilachna vigintioctomaculata complex and its possible relevance to the reproductive isolation, with a note on supernumerary Y chromosomes found in E. pustulosa. Zoological science 10: 997–1015.
  • Vidal OR (1984) Chromosome numbers of Coleoptera from Argentina. Genetica 65: 235–239. doi: 10.1007/BF00122910
  • Yadav JS, Pillai RK (1979) Chromosome studies of six species of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera: Insecta) from Haryana (India). The Nucleus 22: 104–109.
  • Yadav JS, Chaudhary A, Singh J (1991) Karyotypic studies on four species of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Proceeding National Academy Sciences India Section B 61: 145–151.
  • Yosida T (1944) Chromosome studies in the Coleoptera. I. A study of chromosomes in ten species of Coccinellidae and Chrysomelidae. Japanese Journal of Genetics 20: 107–115. doi: 10.1266/jjg.20.107
  • Yosida T (1948) Distinction of three species of Epilachna based on the cytological evidence. Matsumushi 2: 107–109.
  • Zhang L, Rong YS (2012) Retrotransposons at Drosophila telomeres: host domestication of a selfish element for the maintenance of genome integrity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819: 771–775. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.01.018