Review Article |
Corresponding author: Sumita Jha ( sumitajha.cu@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Gennady Karlov
© 2022 Biplab Kumar Bhowmick, Sumita Jha.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2022) A critical review on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae with updates on Indian taxa. Comparative Cytogenetics 16(2): 93-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v16.i2.79033
|
The cytogenetic relationships in the species of Cucurbitaceae are becoming immensely important to answer questions pertaining to genome evolution. Here, a simplified and updated data resource on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae is presented on the basis of foundational parameters (basic, zygotic and gametic chromosome numbers, ploidy, genome size, karyotype) and molecular cytogenetics. We have revised and collated our own findings on seven agriculturally important Indian cucurbit species in a comparative account with the globally published reports. Chromosome count (of around 19% species) shows nearly three-fold differences while genome size (of nearly 5% species) shows 5.84-fold differences across the species. There is no significant correlation between chromosome numbers and nuclear genome sizes. The possible trend of evolution is discussed here based on molecular cytogenetics data, especially the types and distribution of nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). The review supersedes the scopes of general chromosome databases and invites scopes for continuous updates. The offline resource serves as an exclusive toolkit for research and breeding communities across the globe and also opens scope for future establishment of web-database on Cucurbitaceae cytogenetics.
chromosome, genome size, karyotype, NORs, ploidy
The family Cucurbitaceae contains an extensive range of diversity consisting of about 1000 species spread over 96 genera (
Currently, we have collated the cytogenetic reports of Cucurbitaceae globally and integrated our own findings for a collective interpretation. The review attempts to address i) the trend of chromosome evolution in specific tribes and species based on available information, ii) correlation between chromosome numbers and ploidy or genome size in the studied taxa and iii) the requirement of an exclusive cytogenetic catalogue for genome researchers, taxonomists and breeders working on Cucurbitaceae.
The data have been collated as per Schaefer and Renner (2011) after consultation of books, Chromosome atlases, research articles and public resources like Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB; http://ccdb.tau.ac.il/) (
Presently an enzymatic maceration and air drying (EMA) method followed by flurochrome banding has been employed as per our previous protocols (
Chromosome numbers and nature of fluorescent bands in some cucurbit species occurring in India.
Statistical analysis involving foundational cytogenetic parameters have been demonstrated to imply significant knowledge on chromosomal evolution within a group (
Along with the global review, fresh EMA based somatic plates and idiograms (Figs
Somatic metaphase chromosomes and idiograms of Luffa species (2n = 26) stained with Giemsa (A, D, G), DAPI (B, E, H) and CMA3 (C, F, I) A–C L. acutangula D–F L. aegyptiaca cylindrica G–I L. echinata. Arrows indicate satellited chromosomes in Giemsa plates and CMA+ve signals in C, F, I. Corresponding somatic idiograms (haploid set) of: J L. acutangula K L. aegyptiaca L L. echinata, showing DAPI+ve (blue) and CMA+ve (golden yellow) bands. Scale Bars: 5 µm
Somatic metaphase chromosomes and idiograms of Trichosanthes species stained with Giemsa (A, D, I, L), DAPI (C, E, J, M) and CMA3 (B, F, K, N) A–C T. cucumerina ssp. cucumerina (2n = 22), D–F Trichosanthes cucumerina ssp. cucumerina ‘Anguina’ (2n = 22) I–K T. dioica (male, 2n = 22) L–N T. dioica (female, 2n = 22). Arrows indicate satellited chromosomes in Giemsa plates and CMA+ve signals in B, F, K, N. Corresponding somatic idiograms (haploid set) of: G T. cucumerina ssp. cucumerina H Trichosanthes cucumerina ssp. cucumerina ‘Anguina’ O T. dioica male plant P T. dioica female plant. Blue and golden yellow bands in idiograms indicate DAPI+ve and CMA+ve signals, respectively. Scale Bars: 5 µm
Somatic metaphase chromosomes and idiograms of two Benincaseae species (2n = 24) stained with Giemsa (A, D, G), DAPI (B, E, H) and CMA3 (C, F, I) A–C Benincasa hispida D–F Coccinia grandis (female plant) G–I Coccinia grandis (male plant). Arrows indicate satellited chromosomes in Giemsa plates and distal CMA+ve signals in C, F, I. Note the longest Y chromosome without any CMA band in G–I and centromeric CMA+ve signals in F, I. Corresponding somatic idiograms (haploid set) of: J Benincasa hispida K Coccinia grandis (female plant) L Coccinia grandis (male plant) with CMA+ve (golden yellow) bands. Note the X chromosome remaining indistinguishable in L. Scale Bars: 5 µm
Currently, chromosome counts are available for 188 species (~19%) belonging to about 44 genera (~46%) of the 15 tribes, including the less attended ‘understudied tribes’. Within the ‘understudied tribes’, chromosome counts are available for only 42 species (out of almost 310) belonging to 17 genera (out of nearly 44). The basal number ranges from x/n = 5 (Thladiantha Bunge, 1833) to x/n = 15 (Zanonia Linnaeus, 1753) in these tribes (Table
Tribe and Genera | Species studied | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||
Gomphogyneae Gomphogyne Griffith, 1845 |
G. cissiformis Griffith, 1837 | 32a | 16b | Tetraploidc, autopolyploidd; 10 secondary constrictions, one pair satellitede; II, III, IV in meiosisf |
CCDB
b; |
|
Hemsleya F.B. Forbes et Hemsley, 1888 | H. amabilis Diels, 1912, H. carnosiflora Wu et Chen, 1985, H. chinensis Forbes et Hemsley, 1888, H. emeiensis Shen et Chang, 1983, H. graciliflora Cogniaux, 1916, H. heterosperma Wallich, 1831, H. macrocarpa Cogniaux, 1916, H. panacis-scandens Wu et Chen, 1985, H. sphaerocarpa Kuang et Lu, 1982 | 7a | 28b, 22c, 24d, 26e, 32f, 40g, 42h | 14h | Tetraploidi, aneuploidsj |
|
Gynostemma Blume, 1825 | G. cardiospermum Oliver, 1892 | 11a | 66b | Hexaploidc | IPCN a-c | |
G. guangxiense Chen et Qin, 1988 | 22 a | Diploid b | IPCN a,b | |||
G. laxiflorum Wu et Chen, 1983 | 22 a | Diploid b | IPCN a,b | |||
G. longipes Wu et Chen, 1983 | 22a, 44b | Polyploidc | IPCN a-c | |||
G. microspermum Wu et Chen, 1983 | 22a | Diploid b | IPCN a,b | |||
G. pedatum Blume, 1825 | 12a | 24b | Diploidc |
|
||
G. pentagynum Wang, 1989 | 22a | Diploid b | IPCN a,b | |||
G. pentaphyllum Thunberg, 1784 | 22a, 24b, 64c, 66d | Diploide, triploidf, hexaploidg; 2C (flow cytometry): 3.62pgh; 17M+14sm+2sti; CSR: 2.16–4.09 µmj 5S (8), 45S (10) rDNA and telomeric signalsk |
IPCN
a,b,c,e,f; |
|||
G. pentaphyllum var. dasycarpum Wu, 1983 | 22a, 33b, 44c | Polyploidd | IPCN a-d | |||
G. pentaphyllum var. pentaphyllum Thunberg, 1784 | 22a, 44b, 66c, 88d | Polyploide | IPCN a-e | |||
G. yixingense Wang et Xie, 1981 | 88a | Polyploidb | IPCN a,b | |||
Triceratieae | 8a | - |
|
|||
Fevillea Linnaeus, 1753 | ||||||
Zanonieae Zanonia Linnaeus, 1753 | Z. indica Linnaeus, 1759 | 15a | 30b | 15c | Autoploidd; Metacentric chromosomese; CSR: 1.10-1.98 μmf |
|
Actinostemmateae | A. lobatum (Maxim.) Maxim. ex Franch. & Sav. | 16a | - | IPCN a | ||
Actinostemma Griffith, 1841 | A. tenerum Griffith, 1837 | 16a | Diploidb; 7M +1smc; CSR: 2.88–4.02 µmd; 45S (1) rDNA and 45S+5S (1) rDNA adjacent signale; telomeric repeat signalsf |
|
||
Thladiantheae | T. calcarata Clarke, 1876, T. cordifolia Blume, 1826 T. davidii Franchet, 1886, T. dentata Cogniaux, 1916, T. lijiangensis Lu et Zhang, 1981, T. nudiflora Hemsley, 1887, T. pustulata Léveillé, 1916 | |||||
Thladiantha Bunge, 1833 | 3a, 5b, 9c | 18d | 5e, 9f | Diploidg |
|
|
T. dubia Bunge, 1833 | 18a, 22b | Diploidc; 7M+1sm+1std; CSR: 2.60–4.10 µme; 45S (4) and co-localized 45S+5S (1) rDNA signalsf; telomeric repeat signalsg |
|
|||
Baijiania Lu et Li, 1993 | B. yunnanensis Lu et Zhang, 1984 | 32a | - | IPCN a | ||
Siraitieae Siraitia Merrill, 1934 | S. grosvenorii Swingle, 1941 | 28a | 45S (6) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsb |
IPCN
a, |
||
Joliffieae Telfairia Hooker, 1827 | T. occidentalis Hooker, 1871 | 22a, 33b, 44c | Diploidd, aneuploide, triploidf, Tetraploidg; 1 Bh |
|
||
T. pedata Sims, 1826 | 22a | - | Bhowmick and Jha (2015)a | |||
Schizopeponeae Herpetospermum Hooker, 1867 | H. pedunculosum Seringe, 1828 | 11a | 45S (14), 5S (2) rDNA signalsb |
|
||
Schizopepon Maximowicz, 1859 | S. bryoniifolius Maximowicz, 1859 | 10a | 20b | - |
|
|
Coniandreae Apodanthera Arnott, 1841 | A. undulata Gray, 1853 | 14a | - | IPCN a | ||
Corallocarpus Bentham et Hooker, 1867 | C. epigaeus Rottler, 1803 | 26a | 13b | - |
|
|
C. welwitschii Naudin, 1863 | 72a | - | Singh (1990)a | |||
Ibervillea Greene, 1895 | 11a, 12b | - |
|
|||
Kedrostis Medikus, 1791 | K. africana Linnaeus, 1753 | 40a | 2C (feulgen densitometry): 0.8 pgb; 2C (flow cytometry): 1674 Mbpc | Bennet et al. (1982)a,b, Plant C DNA Values Databasec | ||
K. foetidissima Jacquin, 1788 | 26a | 13b |
|
|||
K. rostrata Rottler, 1803 | 13a | 26b | 13c | - | IPCN a-c | |
Seyrigia Keraudren, 1960 | 13a | - | IPCN a |
Species | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2n | n | |||
M. balsamina Linnaeus, 1753 | 22a | Diploidb; two chromosomes with double constrictionsc; CSR:0.65–1.98µmd; MCL:1.30µme; TCL: 28.61µmf |
|
|
M. charantia | 22a | 11b | Diploide, 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 4.10pg f, 2C (flow cytometry): 1.43pgg; chromosomes mostly metacentric, few submetacentric and subtelocentrich; 2 chromosomes with satellitesi; CSR: 1.26-1.81µmj; 45S (4) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsk | Plant DNA C-Values Databasef; |
M. charantia var. charantia | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 2C (flow cytometry): 0.72pgd; NORs: 4e; nucleolar and centromeric CMA+ bandsf ; CSR: 1.27-3.07µmg; MCL: 1.97 µmh; HCL: 21.77µmi |
|
M. charantia var. muricata Chakravarty, 1982 | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 2C (flow cytometry): 1.16pgd; NORs: 6e; nucleolar and centromeric CMA+ bandsf; CSR: 1.64-3.13µmg; MCL: 2.19µmh; HCL: 24.19µmi |
|
M. cochinchinensis Loureiro, 1790 | 28a | 14b | Diploidc, 2C (flow cytometry): 2.64pgd, 6e chromosomes with secondary constrictions; CSR:1.16–2.03µmf /1.71-3.17μmg ; MCL: 2.27µmh; HCL: 31.86μmi; 45S (8) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsj |
IPCN
b; |
M. cymbalaria | 18a | 8b, 9c, 11d | Diploide, 2C (flow cytometry): 3.74 pgf; 2g–4h chromosomes with secondary constrictions; CSR: 2.71-4.57μmi; MCL:3.75μmj; HCL: 33.79μmk |
IPCN
b; CCDBb,d; |
M. denudata Clarke, 1879 | 14a | - | IPCN a | |
M. dioica Willdenow, 1805 | 28a, 56b | Diploidc; 2C (flow cytometry): 3.36 pgd, 2e-12f chromosomes with secondary constrictions; CSR: 2.04-3.58μmg; MCL: 2.75µmh; HCL: 77.10μmi; 45S (4) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsj |
|
|
M. foetida Schumacher, 1827 | 44a | - | Behera et al. (2011)a | |
M. rostrata Zimmermann, 1922 | 22a | - | Behera et al. (2011)a | |
M. sahyadrica Kattukunnel et Antony, 2007 | 28a | 2 chromosomes with secondary constrictionsb; CSR: 0.73–1.83µmc; TCL: 37.53µmd, MCL: 1.34µme | Behera et al. (2011)a-e | |
M. subangulata Blume, 1826 | 56a | 2C (flow cytometry): 3.06pgb; 8 chromosomes with secondary constrictionsc; CSR: 1.52-3.11μmd; HCL: 60.30μme |
|
|
M. subangulata subsp. renigera Don, 1834 | 56a | 4 chromosomes with secondary constrictionsb; CSR: 0.52-1.26µmc; MCL: 0.93µmd; TCL 51.88µme |
|
|
M. tuberosa Miquel, 1855 | 22a | 11b | - | IPCN a,b; CCDBa,b |
Genera | Species studied | Chromosome no. | Genome size | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||
Bryonia | 10a |
|
||||
B. alba Linnaeus, 1753 | 10a | 20b | 10c | 2C (flow cytometry): 5827Mbpd |
CCDB
d , |
|
B. aspera Ledebour, 1843 | 10a | 40b, 60c | 20d, 10e | - |
|
|
B . cretica Linnaeus, 1753 | 10a | 60b | 30c | - |
|
|
B. dioica Jacquin, 1774 | 10a | 20b | 10c | 2C (microdensitometry): 4.01pgd; 2C (flow cytometry): 5522Mbpe |
CCDB
d,e, |
|
B. macrostylis Heilbronn et Bilge, 1954 | 10a | - | IPCN a | |||
B . marmorata Petit, 1889 | 40a | 20b | - |
|
||
B . monoica Aitchison et Hemsley, 1886 | 10a | 20b | - |
|
||
B. multiflora Boissier et Heldreich, 1849 | 10a | - |
|
|||
B. syriaca Boissier, 1856 | 10a | 20b | - |
|
||
B. verrucosa Aiton, 1789 | 10a | 20b | 10c | 2C (flow cytometry): 2.09pgd; 4504Mbpe |
CCDB
d,e, |
|
Ecballium | 12a |
|
||||
E. elaterium Linnaeus, 1753 | 18a | 12b | 2C (flow cytometry): 2442Mbpc | Veselý (2012)c , |
||
E. elaterium subsp. dioicum Battandier, 1989 | 18a, 24b | 9c, 12d | - |
|
||
E. elaterium subsp. elaterium | 18a | 9b | - |
|
Genera studied | Species studied | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||
Cyclanthera Lilja, 1870 |
8a |
|
||||
C. pedata (L.) Schrader, 1831 | 16a, 32b | 8c | Diploide |
|
||
Echinocystis Torrey et Gray, 1840 | 8a | 16b |
|
|||
E. lobata Michaux, 1803 | 16a, 32b | Tetraploidc; 2C (flow cytometry):1.49pgd | IPCN a,b, Plant DNA C-Values Database c,d | |||
E. macrocarpa Greene, 1885 | 32a | - |
|
|||
Echinopepon Naudin, 1866 | E. wrightii Gray, 1853 | 12a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | ||
Frantzia | 12a, 14b | - | Schaefer and Renner (2011)a,b | |||
Hodgsonia Persson, 1953 | H. macrocarpa var. capniocarpa Ridley, 1920 | 18a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | ||
Luffa | 13a |
|
||||
L. acutangula | 13a | 26b | 13c | Diploidd; CSR:1.39–3.20μme; 18m+2sm+6m.stf; NORs:6g; distal DAPI and nucleolar CMA signalsh |
|
|
L. acutangula var. acutangula | 13a | - |
|
|||
L. acutangula var. amara Clarke, 1879 | 13a | - |
|
|||
L. aegyptiaca (syn L. cylindrica Roemer, 1846) | 13a | 26b | 13c | Diploidd, 2C (flow cytometry): 1.56 pge; 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 1.7pgf; CSR: 1.60–2.06μmg; 24M+1smh; 22m+ 4m.sti; NORs:2j; nucleolar and distal CMA signalsk; 45S (10) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsl | Bennet et al. (1982)b,d,f, |
|
L. echinata | 26a, 39b, 52c | 13d | Diploide; CSR 2.44–3.96 μmf; 16m+4sm+6m.stg; NORs: 6h; Distal and intercalary DAPI and nucleolar CMA signalsi |
|
||
L. graveolens Roxburgh, 1832 | 13a | - |
|
|||
L. hermaphrodita Singh et Bhandari, 1963 | 13a | - | IPCN a | |||
L. operculata Linnaeus, 1759 | 13a | 26b | 13c | - |
|
|
Sicyos (75, includes Sechium, Microsechium) | 12a | 24b | - |
|
||
S. angulatus | 12a | 24b | Diploidc; CSR: 1.9-4.6µmd; 4 adjacent 45S+5S rDNA signalse |
|
||
S. australis Endlicher, 1833 | 24a, 26b | 12IIc, 13IId | IPCN a-d, CCDBa-d | |||
S. edulis Jacquin, 1760 (syn of Sechium edule) | 13a | 26b, 28c | 12d, 13e | Diploidf; metacentric and submetaccentric chromosomesg; CSR: 2.69–5.38µmh; 45S (6), 5S (2) rDNA and telomeric repeat signals (28)i |
|
|
S. nihoaensis St. John, 1970 | 12a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
Sechium compositum Smith, 1903 (syn. Microsechium compositum) | 14a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
S. hintonii Wilson, 1958 (syn Microsechium hintonii) | 14a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
Trichosanthes (100) | 11a |
|
||||
T. anaimalaiensis Beddome, 1864 | 22a | 11b | - |
|
||
T. boninensis Nakai et Tuyama, 1928 | 22a | - | IPCN a | |||
T. bracteata Lamarck, 1797 | 11a | 22b, 44c, 66d | - |
|
||
T. bracteata var. bracteata | 11a, 22b | - |
|
|||
T. chingiana Handel-Mazzetti, 1936 | 22a | - | IPCN a | |||
T. costata Blume, 1826 (syn Gymnopetalum chinense Loureiro, 1790) | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (6) and 5S (4) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
T. cucumerina | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 12m+4M+2sm+4sm.std; CSR: 2.26–4.99µme; 6 chromosomes with double constrictionsf; NORs: 4g; nucleolar CMA and distal DAPI bandsh |
|
||
T. cucumerina ssp. cucumerina Anguina | 11a | 22b | 11c, 22d, 32e, 33f | Diploide; 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 2.2pgf; CSR: 2.77–5.01μmg; 12m+4M+2sm+4sm.sth; 6 chromosomes with double constrictionsi; NORs: 4j; nucleolar and distal CMA bandsk; 45S (6) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsl |
|
|
T. dioica | 11a | 22b | 11c | Diploidd; 2C (flow cytometry): male-2.27pg, female- 2.32 pge; 12m+6Sm +2St+2Sm.tf; distal DAPI bandsg; distal CMA bands in femalesh; 1 rod bivalent in meiosisi |
|
|
T. dunniana Léveillé, 1911 | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (6) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
T. himalensis Clarke, 1879 | 11a | - |
|
|||
T. hupehensis Cheng et Yueh, 1974 | 22a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
T. kirilowii Maximowicz, 1859 | 60a, 66b, 88c, 110d | Hexa-, octa-, decaploide;CSR: 2.3-3.5μmf; 45S (4), 5S (4) and 45S +5S (6) adjacent rDNA signalsg |
IPCN
a, CCDBa, |
|||
T. kirilowii var. japonica | 11a | - | Roy and Saran (1990)a | |||
T. lepiniana Naudin, 1868 | 44a | 11b | 1 Bc |
|
||
T. lobata Roxburgh, 1832 | 11a | 11b | - |
|
||
T. mianyangensis Yueh et. Liao, 1992 | 88a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
T. nervifolia Linnaeus, 1753 | 11a | - |
|
|||
T. ovigera Blume, 1826 | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (10) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
T. palmata Linnaeus, 1759 | 22a, 44b, 66c | 11d | IPCN a-d | |||
T. pedata Merril et Chun, 1934 | 22a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
T. truncata Clarke, 1879 | 22a | - | IPCN a, CCDBa | |||
T. wallichiana Wight, 1840 | 11a | 22b | - |
|
Genera studied | Species studied | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||
Benincasa | B. fistulosa | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (4) and 5S (4) signalsc |
|
||
B. hispida | 12a | 24b | 12c | Diploidd; 2C (flow cytometry):1.97pge, 2C (feulgen densitometry):2.1pgf; CSR 2.54-4.59µmg; 16m+6Sm+2Sm.th; NORs:2i; distal CMA signalsj; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsk | Plant DNA C-Values Databasef, |
|
Citrullus | 11a |
|
||||
C. amarus (syn. C. lanatus var. citroides) | 11a | 22b | Diploidc; CSR: 3.1–4.7μmd; 45S (2) and 5S (4) rDNA signalse |
|
||
C. colocynthis | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsd |
|
||
C. ecirrhosus | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 2 satellites detected in meiosisd; 45S (2) and 5S (4) rDNA signalse; regular meiosisf |
|
||
C. lanatus | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; CSR: 1.09μm-1.72μmd; 14m+8sme; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsf; linkage groups hybridized to chromosomesg |
|
||
C. lanatus subsp. lanatus | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 5S (4) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. lanatus subsp. mucosospermus Fursa, 1972 | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. lanatus subsp. vulgaris Schrader, 1836 | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. lanatus var. lanatus | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. naudinianus (syn Acanthosicyos naudinianus) | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. rehmii | 22a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
C. vulgaris Schrader, 1836 | 22a, 44b | 11c | Diploidd; 2C: 0.88/0.90pge |
IPCN
a,c,d, |
||
Coccinia (30) | 12a |
|
||||
C. abyssinica Lamarck, 1753 | 12a | 24b | - |
|
||
C. grandis | 12a | 24b | 12c | Diploidd, 2C (Flow cytometry): male- 0.943e/0.92f pg and female- 0.849g/ 0.73h pg; CSR: 1.33-4.71μm (male) and 1.35-2.26µm (female)i; 15m+4M+2sm+2m:sm+1m:st (Y) in male and 14m+6M+2sm+2m:st in femalej; NORs-2k; chromosomal C bandsl; centromeric, nucleolar CMA bandsm; 45S (4)n rDNA signals, 2 signals adjacent to 5So; GISH performedp; repetitive, organellar DNA hybridizedq; centromere immunofluorescencer; heteromorphic sex chromosomes (largest Y)s; X-Y bivalent (meiosis)t |
|
|
C. hirtella Cogniaux, 1896 | 24a | Diploidb; 2C (flow cytometry): male-0.988pgc; 45S (4) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsd, repetitive and organellar DNA hybridizede; centromere immunofluorescence performedf |
|
|||
C. sessilifolia Sonder, 1881 | 24a | Diploidb; 2C (Flow cytometry): male- 0.984pg, female- 0.998pgc; 45S (4) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsd; repetitive and organellar DNAe; centromere immunofluorescence performedf |
|
|||
C. trilobata | 20a | Diploidb; 2C (flow cytometry): male- 1.263pg c; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsd, repetitive, organellar DNA sequence hybridizede |
|
|||
Ctenolepis Hooker, 1867 | C. garcinii Burman, 1768 | 24a | 12b | - |
|
|
Diplocyclos Endlicher, 1833 | D. palmatus | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (4) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
||
Lagenaria Seringe, 1825 | L. leucantha Rusby, 1896 | 22a | 11b | - | IPCN a,b, CCDBa,b | |
L. leucantha var. clavata Makino, 1940 | 22a | - | CCDB a | |||
L. siceraria | 11a | 22b | 11c | Diploidd, 2C (flow cytometry): 0.734pge; 2C (Feulgen densitometry):1.4pgf; CSR: 0.56–1.06μmg; metacentric and few sub-metacentric chromosomesh; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsi |
|
|
L. siceraria var. macrocarpa | 22a | - | CCDB a | |||
L. vulgaris Seringe, 1825 | 22a | 11b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 1.40pgd | Bennet et al. (1982)a,b,c | ||
Melothria | 11a, 12b |
|
||||
M. pendula Linnaeus, 1753 | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
M. perpusilla Blume, 1826 | 48a | - |
|
|||
M. scabra Naudin, 1866 | 24a | - | CCDB a | |||
Peponium Engler, 1897 | P. betsiliense Keraudren, 1960 | 24a | - | CCDB a | ||
Solena | S. amplexicaulis Lamarck, 1785 (syn. S. heterophylla, Melothria heterophylla, Zehneria umbellata) | 22a, 24b, 26c, 36d, 48e | 11f, 12g, 24h | 2-4 Bi |
|
|
Zehneria | Z. capillacea Jeffrey, 1962 (syn. Melothria capillacea) | 22a | - | CCDB a | ||
Z. indica Loureiro, 1790 (syn. Melothria japonica) | 11a | 22b | 24c | Diploidd; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalse |
|
|
Z. marlothii Cogniaux, 1962 | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (2) and 45S+5S (2) adjacent rDNA signalsc |
|
|||
Z. maysorensis Wight et Arnott, 1834 | 48a | 24b | 45S (2) and 5S (2) signalsc |
|
||
Z. mucronata Blume, 1856 (syn. Melothria mucronata) | 22a | 12b | - | Darlington et al. (1956)a, CCDBb | ||
Z. scabra Sonder, 1862 (syn. Melothria punctata) | 24a, 48b | - |
CCDB
a, |
|||
Z. thwaitesii Schweinfurth, 1868 | 44a | - | CCDB a |
Species with subspecies/ varieties | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||||
C. aculeatus Cogniaux, 1895 | 48a | Allotetraploidb; 24IIc | IPCN a-c, CCDBa-c | |||||
C. africanus Linnaeus, 1782 | 12a | 24b, 48c | 12d | Diploide; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 1.782pgf; 4 satellited chromosomesg; 45S (4h/6i) rDNA signals, 2 co-localized 45S+5S signalsj |
IPCN
b,c, |
|||
C. angolensis Cogniaux, 1881. | 24a | IPCN a | ||||||
C. anguria Linnaeus, 1753 | 24a | Diploidb; majorly submetacentric and few nearly metacentric chromosomesc; 1 pair satellitedd; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalse, ScgCP enables chromosome identificationf; GISH reveals cross species relationshipsg | Singh and Roy (1974)a-d, |
|||||
C. anguria var. anguria | 12a | 24b | 12c | Diploidd; 4 satellited chromosomese; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsf |
|
|||
C. anguria var. longipes | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 1.587pgd |
|
||||
C. anguria var. longaculeatus | 12a | 12.5 | Diploidc; 4 satellited chromosomesd; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalse |
|
||||
C. asper Cogniaux, 1901 | 24a | Diploidb; 45S (4) and 5S (2) signals detectedc |
IPCN
a, |
|||||
C. callosus Rottler, 1803 | 14a, 24b | 12c | Diploidd; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry):1.590pge; 11m+1sm (haploid)f |
|
||||
C. cinereusCogniaux, 1901 (syn. Cucumella cinerea) | 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 0.5pga | Bennet et al. (1982)a | ||||||
C. diniae Raamsdonk et Visser, 1992 | 48a | - | IPCN a | |||||
C. dinteri Cogniaux, 1901 | 24a | Diploidb; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.167pgc |
IPCN
a, |
|||||
C. dipsaceus Spach, 1838 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.448pgd; 2m+8sm+2st (haploid)e; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsf |
|
||||
C. ficifoliusRichard, 1847 | 24a, 48b | 12c | Diploidd; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry):1.373pge; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsf |
|
||||
C. figarei Naudin, 1859 | 48a, 72b | Autoallopolyploidc; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 3.886pge; 36IIf |
IPCN
a-f, |
|||||
C. heptadactylis Naudin, 1859 | 48a | 23b, 24c, 52d | Autotetraploide; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.225pgf; 8 satellited chromosomesg; 45S (8) rDNA signalsh of which 4 co-localized to 5S signalsi or separate 5S (4) rDNA signalsj; 10IV+4IIk; irregular meiosisl |
IPCN a,e,k, |
||||
C. hookeri Naudin, 1870 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc |
|
||||
C. humifructus Stent, 1927 | 24a | Diploidb; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.455 pgc |
|
|||||
C. hystrix Chakravarty, 1952 | 12a | 24b | Diploidc; 2m+10sm (haploid)d; 45S (4) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalse; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber chromosome C7f, GISH reveals cross species relationshipsg |
|
||||
C. indicus Ghebretinsae et Thulin, 2007 | 20a | Diploidb; 4m+ 6sm (haploid)c |
|
|||||
C. javanicus Miquel, 1856 (syn. Melothria assamica) | 12a | 24b, 48c | - |
|
||||
C. leiospermus Wight et Arnott, 1834 (syn. Melothria leiosperma) | 24a | - | CCDB a | |||||
C. leptodermis Schweickerdt, 1933 | 24a | 12b | - |
|
||||
C. longipes Hooker, 1871 | 24a | - | IPCN a | |||||
C. meeusei Jeffrey, 1965 | 48b | 22c, 24d | Tetraploide; 2C- 3.203pg (Feulgen microdensitometry)f; 45S (6) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsg |
|
||||
C. melo Linnaeus, 1753 | 12a | 20b, 22c, 24d | 12e | Diploidf; 2C (Feulgen photometry) : 0.94-1.04pgg, 1.90pgh; 2C (Flow cytometry): 1.05pgi; 14m+10st (2SAT)j; 7m+5sm (haploid)k; 4 satellitesl or 2 satellitesm; CSR1.0-2.1μmn; CMA bands detectedo; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsp; centromeric, telomeric, nulceolar and SSR probe hybridization reveals chromosomal relationq; ScgCP applied for comparative chromosome rearrangement studywith C. sativusr; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber chromosome C7s; novel centromeric satellite DNA hybridized on chromosomest; GISH reveals cross species relationshipsu; infraspecific positional differences in 45S (terminal and interstitial) -5S (terminal, subterminal and interstitial) rDNA signalsv |
CCDB
b,c, Plant DNA C-Values Databaseh, |
|||
C. melo subsp. melo | 12a | 24b | Diploid; 45S (4) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
||||
C. melo subsp. agrestis Naudin, 1859 | 12a | 24b | Diploid; 45S (4) and 5S (2) rDNA signalsc |
|
||||
C. melo var. agrestis | 12a | 24b | 12c | Diploidd; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.483pge; 10m+2sm (haploid)f; 1 pair satellitedg | Singh and Roy (1974)b,d,g, |
|||
C. melo var. conomon Thunberg, 1780 | 24a | Diploidb; 7m+3sm+2st (haploid)c |
|
|||||
C. melo var. flexuosus Linnaeus, 1763 | 24a | - | IPCN a | |||||
C. melo var. inodorus Jacquin, 1832 | 24a | Diploidb; 2C (flow cytometry): 0.64pgc |
|
|||||
C. melo var. melo | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 4m+8sm (haploid)d |
|
||||
C. melo var. momordica Roxburgh, 1832 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.291pgd; 6m+5sm+1st (haploid)e |
|
||||
C. melo var. muskmelon | 24a | 12b |
|
|||||
C. melo var. utilissimus Roxburgh, 1832 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 2.358 pgd |
|
||||
C. membranifolius Hooker, 1871 | 48a | 24b | - |
|
||||
C. metulifer Naudin, 1859 (syn. C. metuliferus) | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 2.391pgd; metacentric, submetacentric, subtelocentric chromosomese; CSR: 0.9–2.0 μmf; 4 satellitesg; nucleolar and centromeric CMA-DAPI bandsh; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsi, satellite sequencesj and telomeric DNAk hybridized on chromosomes; ScgCP applied for comparative chromosome rearrangement studywith C. sativusl; GISH reveals cross species relationshipsm |
|
||||
C. myriocarpus | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 45S (2d/4e) and co-localized 45S+5S (2)f rDNA signalsd |
CCDB
a; |
||||
C. myriocarpus subsp. leptodermis Schweickerdt, 1933 | 12a | 24b | Diploidc; 4 satellited chromosomesd; 45S (3e, 2f) and co-localized 45S+5S (2g) rDNA signals |
|
||||
C. myriocarpus var. myriocarpus | 12a | 48b | Tetraploidc; 8 satellited chromosomesd; 45S (4) and co-localized 45S+5S (4) rDNA signalse |
|
||||
C. prophetarum Linnaeus, 1755 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc, 2C (Feulgen Microdensitometry): 1.656 pgd 5m+7sm (haploid)e |
|
||||
C. prophetarum subsp. zeyheri Sonder, 1862 | 48a | - | IPCN a | |||||
C. pubescens Willdenow, 1805 | 24a | 12b | - |
IPCN
a; |
||||
C. pustulatus Hooker, 1871 | 48a, 72b | 24c | Hexaploidd, 45S (8) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalse; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber chromosome C7f |
|
||||
C. ritchiei Clarke, 1879 | 24a | Diploidb, 8m+4sm (haploid)c |
|
|||||
C. sagittatus Peyritsch, 1860 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc, 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry):1.571pgd |
|
||||
C. sativus Linnaeus, 1753 | 7a | 14b | 7c | Diploidd, 2C (flow cytometry): 1.03pge /1.77pgf; 12 metacentric and 2 sub-metacentric chromosomesg; CSR: 0.83-1.01μmh, chromosomal C-bandsi; centromeric 45S (10) and distal 5S (2) rDNA signalsj; FISH with centromeric and telomerick and SSR probe reveals chromosome evolutionl; high resolution molecular cytogenetic mapm; ScgCP applied for cross species chromosome rearrangement studyn; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber chromosome C7 in comparison with 5 Cucumis specieso; GISH reveals cross species relationshipsp |
|
|||
C. sativus var. Hokutosei | 7a | 14b | Diploidc, 12 metacentric, 2 sub-metacentric chromosomesd; centromeric and telomeric signalse |
|
||||
C. sativus var. hardwickii Royle, 1835 | 7a | 14b | Diploidc; 2C (Feulgen Microdensitometry): 1.798pgd; 6m+1sm (haploid)e; centromeric 45S (6) and intercalary 5S (2) rDNA signalsf, centromeric, telomeric and SSR probe hybridizationgh; molecular cytogenetic mapi |
|
||||
C. sativus var. Long green | 7a | 14b | Diploidc, 12 metacentric, 2 sub-metacentric chromosomesd; centromeric and telomeric sequence signalse |
|
||||
C. sativus var. sativus (CSS) | 7a | 14b | Diploidc, centromeric 45S (10) and intercalary 5S (2) rDNA signalsd; centromeric and distal repetitive sequence probese; molecular cytogenetic mapf |
|
||||
C. sativus cv. Winter Long | 14a | 7b | Diploidc, C- bandingd, DAPI bandinge, 45S (6) and 5 S (2) rDNA signalsf, repetitive sequence based molecular karyotype in somatic and pachytene chromosomesg |
|
||||
C. sativus var. xishuangbannesis Qi et Yuan Zhenzhen, 1983 | 7a | 14b | Diploidc, centromeric 45S (10) and intercalary 5S (2) rDNA signalsd; centromeric and telomeric signalse |
|
||||
C. setosus Cogniaux, 1881 | 24a | 12b | Diploidc; 4m+5sm+3st (haploid)d |
|
||||
C. silentvalleyii Manilal et Sabu et Mathew, 1985 | 24a | 12b | - |
|
||||
C. trigonus Roxb. | 24a | 12b | - |
|
||||
C. zambianus Widrl., J.H.Kirkbr., Ghebret. and K.R.Reitsma | 12a | 24b | Diploidc; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) signalsd |
|
||||
C. zeyheri Sond. | 24a, 48b | Diploidc, Allotetraploidd; 2C (Feulgen densitometry): 1.682e/2.846 pgf; 4 satellitesg; 45S (2) and co-localized 45S+5S (2) rDNA signalsh; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber schromosome C7i; 24IIj , 12IIk, 11II+2Il |
IPCN
a,b,d,j,k,l, |
|||||
Cucumella cinerea (Cogn.) C.Jeffrey | 2C (Feulgen Microdensitometry): 0.50pga | Bennet et al. (1982)a | ||||||
Mukia maderaspatana (L.) M.Roem. (syn. Cucumis maderaspatanas and Melothria maderaspatana) | 12a | 24b | 11c, 12d | - |
CCDB
b,c, |
|||
Oreosyce africana Hook.f. (syn. Cucumis subsericeus) | 12a | 48b | Tetraploidc; co-localized 45S and 5S rDNA signals (2)d; FISH with bulked oligo probe from cucumber chromosome C7e |
|
Genera studied | Species studied | Chromosome no. | Ploidy, Genome size, Chromosome features | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | 2n | n | ||||
Cayaponia Silva Manso, 1836 | C. laciniosa Linnaeus, 1753 | 24a | - |
|
||
Cucurbita | 10a, 12b | - |
|
|||
C. andreana Naudin, 1896 | 40a | CCDB a | ||||
C. argyrosperma Huber, 1867 (syn. C. mixta Pangalo, 1930) | 40a | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.748 pgb | Sisko et al. (2003)a,b | |||
C. cylindrata Bailey, 1943 | 40a | 20b | - | CCDB a,b | ||
C. digitata Gray, 1853 | 10a, 12b | 40c | 20d | - |
|
|
C. ecuadorensis Cutler et Whitaker, 1969 | 2C: 0.72pga | Plant DNA C Value databasea | ||||
C. ficifolia Bouché, 1837 (syn. C. melanosperma Gasparrini, 1847) | 40a | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.933pgb | Plant DNA C- Values Databasea,b | |||
C. foetidissima Kunth, 1817 | 10a, 12b | 40c, 42d | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.686pge |
|
||
C. indica (unresolved) | 40a | - | IPCN a | |||
C. lundelliana Bailey, 1943 | 20a | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.72pgb | CCDB a, Plant DNA C Value databaseb | |||
C. maxima Duchesne, 1786 | 20a | 24b, 40c, 44d, 48e | 20f |
|
||
C. moschata Duchesne, 1786 | 10a, 12b | 24c, 40d, 44e,48f | Diploidg; 2C (Feulgen microdensitometry): 0.90pgh; 2C (flow cytometry): 0.708i/ 0.97jpg; 36 metacentric and 4 sub-metacentric chromosomesk; CSR: 1.05-1.78μml, 45S (10) and 5S (4) rDNA signalsm |
CCDB
f, Plant DNA C- Values Databaseh,i, |
||
C. okeechobeensis ssp. martinezii Bailey, 1943 | 40a | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.74pgb | Plant DNA C- Values Databasea,b | |||
C. palmata Watson, 1876 | 10a, 12b | 40c, 42d | 20e | - |
|
|
C. pedatifolia Bailey, 1943 | 40a | - | CCDB a | |||
C. pepo Linnaeus, 1753 | 10a, 12b | 22c, 24d, 28e, 40f, 42g, 44h, 46i, 80j | 20k | 2C (flow cytometry): 0.74pgl; 0.864m; 1.109 pg-1.064 pgn; 1.18pgo; 45S (10) and 5S (4) rDNA signalsp |
|
|
Sicana Naudin, 1862 | S. odorifera Vellozo, 1831 | 40a | 20b | - | IPCN a,b |
Nuclear genome sizes are reported in 49 species (~5% of total species) belonging to 15 genera (~16% of total genera) of Cucurbitaceae. Among the understudied tribes, 2C genome content is known for one species each from Gomphogyneae and Coniandreae (Table
Among the understudied tribes, information on chromosome morphology, size and karyotype are reported in very few taxa (Table
Karyotypes and chromosome sizes are reported in ten species of Momordiceae (Table
Karyotype and chromosome size is reported in eight 8 species of Sicyoeae (Table
Benincaseae generally reveal two distal 45S rDNA loci of which at least one locus is either adjacent to 5S rDNA locus (Table
Citrullus colocynthis Linnaeus, 1753 and C. lanatus Thunberg, 1794 may share a common ancestor both having two 45S rDNA loci and one 5S locus. Loss of one 45S rDNA locus has given way to C. rehmii De Winter, 1990 while gain of one 5S rDNA locus has been proposed to lead to C. ecirrhosus Cogniaux, 1888 and C. lanatus var. citroides Bailey, 1930 (presently C. amarus Schrader, 1836) (
The genus Cucumis is the largest in Benincaseae with 65 species of which 39 have been studied (Table
The dramatic evolution of Y chromosome was validated in karyotypes (Fig.
Distinct 45S rDNA sites are higher in number than 5S rDNA sites in Cucurbitaceae (Fig.
Types of chromosomes bearing the NORs as per available reports of rDNA hybridization in Cucurbitaceae. Type I: Chromosomes with only non-colocalised 45S and 5S rDNA sites, Type II: Chromosomes with colocalised 45S and 5S rDNA sites, Type III: Chromosomes with both non- colocalised and colocalised 45S and 5S rDNA sites. See text for explanation.
Chromsome numbers in Cucurbitaceae range from x = 5 to x = 16. The most prevalent number x = 12 (Fig.
Data on fundamental cytogenetic parameters utilized for statistical analysis.
Species | 2n Chromosome no. | Ploidy | 2C genome size (pg) | MCL (μm) | HCL (μm) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gynostemma pentaphyllum | 66 | 6 | 3.62 |
|
||
Zanonia indica | 30 | 2 | 1.47 | 22.12 |
|
|
Momordica balsamina | 22 | 2 | 1.30 | 14.3# |
|
|
Momordica charantia var. charantia | 22 | 2 | 0.72 | 1.97 | 21.77 |
|
Momordica charantia var. muricata | 22 | 2 | 1.16 | 2.19 | 24.19 |
|
Momordica cochinchinensis | 28 | 2 | 2.64 | 2.27 | 31.86 |
|
Momordica cymbalaria | 18 | 2 | 3.74 | 3.75 | 33.79 |
|
Momordica dioica | 56 | 4 | 3.36 | 2.75 | 77.1 |
|
Momordica sahyadrica | 28 | 2 | 1.34 | 18.76 |
|
|
Momordica subangulata | 56 | 4 | 3.06 | 2.15 | 60.3 |
|
Luffa acutangula | 26 | 2 | 2.20 | 28.63 | this study | |
Luffa cylindrica | 26 | 2 | 1.56 | 2.98 | 38.77 |
|
Luffa echinata | 26 | 2 | 3.17 | 41.26 | this study | |
Trichosanthes cucumerina | 22 | 2 | 3.47 | 37.855 |
|
|
Trichosanthes cucumerina subsp. cucumerina Anguina | 22 | 2 | 3.43 | 37.74 |
|
|
Trichosanthes dioica Male | 22 | 2 | 2.27 | 3.71 | 40.82 |
|
Trichosanthes dioica Female | 22 | 2 | 2.32 | 3.71 | 40.82 |
|
Benincasa hispida | 24 | 2 | 1.97 | 3.17 | 38.08 |
|
Citrullus lanatus | 22 | 2 | 1.33# | 14.67 |
|
|
Coccinia grandis male | 24 | 2 | 0.92 | 1.80 | 20.32 |
|
Coccinia grandis female | 24 | 2 | 0.73 | 1.86 | 19.85 |
|
Coccinia hirtella | 24 | 2 | 0.988 |
|
||
Coccinia sessilifolia Male | 24 | 2 | 0.984 |
|
||
Coccinia sessilifolia Female | 24 | 2 | 0.998 |
|
||
Coccinia trilobata | 20 | 2 | 1.263 |
|
||
Lagenaria siceraria | 22 | 2 | 0.734 | 1.79 | 20.06 |
|
Cucumis africanus | 24 | 2 | 2.08 | 25.045 |
|
|
Cucumis anguria var. anguria | 24 | 2 | 2.13 | 25.6 |
|
|
Cucumis anguria var. longaculeatus | 24 | 2 | 2.10 | 25.195 |
|
|
Cucumis heptadactylus | 48 | 4 | 2.09 | 50.225 |
|
|
Cucumis melo | 24 | 2 | 1.05 | 1.50 | 17.8# |
|
Cucumis melo var. inodorus | 24 | 2 | 0.64 |
|
||
Cucumis myriocarpus var. leptodermis | 24 | 2 | 1.93 | 23.19 |
|
|
Cucumis myriocarpus var. myriocarpus | 48 | 4 | 2.25 | 53.985 |
|
|
Cucumis zeyheri | 24 | 2 | 2.30 | 27.56 |
|
|
Cucumis sativus | 14 | 2 | 1.03, 1.77## | 2.07# | 14.50 |
|
Cucurbita argyrosperma | 40 | 0.748 |
|
|||
Cucurbita ecuadorensis | 40 | 0.933 | Sisko et al. (2003) | |||
Cucurbita foetidissima | 40 | 0.686 | Sisko et al. (2003) | |||
Cucurbita moschata | 40 | 2 | 0.708, 0.97## | 1.26# | 25.19 | Sisko et al. (2003), Barrow and Meister (2003), |
Cucurbita okeechobeensis ssp. martinezii | 40 | 0.74 | Sisko et al. (2003) |
The types of different base numbers (x, based on published reports) or possible base numbers (x/n, based on reported haploid counts) in Cucurbitaceae. The numbers in brackets beside names of genera signify the number of species whose chromosome counts are reported. The % of genera and species with a particular chromosome number, is indicated at the end arrow (out of a total of 44 genera and 188 species with chromosome counts).
Scatter plots of 2n chromosome number and ploidy level (predictor variables) versus 2C genome size, MCL (mean chromosome length) and HCL (total length of haploid chromosome set) in Cucurbitaceae taxa. Symbols below plots depict regression analysis parameters; square: adjusted R square, circle: standard error of the estimate, triangle: Pearson Correlation, star: 2-tailed significance of Pearson Correlation. Regular lines indicate significant linear regression and dotted lines indicate not significant linear regress
Chromosome number and genome size information in the basal clades (understudied tribes) should be given attention to infer ancient base numbers. The parameters of fundamental and molecular cytogenetics are inevitable for genomic interpretation (Weiss-Schneeweiss and Schneeweiss 2013;
SJ is thankful to the National Academy of Sciences (NASI, Allahabad, India) for the NASI Senior Scientist Fellowship award. BKB gratefully acknowledges Principal, Scottish Church College, India for continuous support and encouragement in research activities.
Biplab Kumar Bhowmick https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-1098
Sumita Jha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-2768