Research Article |
Corresponding author: Satyawada Rama Rao ( srrao22@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: Lorenzo Peruzzi
© 2015 Anju Shamurailatpam, Latha Madhavan, Shrirang Ramachandra Yadav, Kangila Venkatraman Bhat, Satyawada Rama Rao.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR (2015) Heterochromatin distribution and comparative karyo-morphological studies in Vigna umbellata Thunberg, 1969 and V. aconitifolia Jacquin, 1969 (Fabaceae) accessions. Comparative Cytogenetics 9(1): 119-132. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i1.9012
|
Chromosome studies along with heterochromatin distribution pattern analysis have been carried out in two domesticated species of Vigna Savi, 1824 which grow in contrasting geo-climatic conditions of India: Vigna umbellata Thunberg, 1969, a legume well acclimatized to subtropical hilly regions of North-east India and V. aconitifolia Jacquin, 1969, a species of arid and semi-arid regions in desert plains of Western India. Karyo-morphological studies in both species reveal 2n = 22 chromosomes without any evidence of numerical variation and the overall karyotype symmetry in chromosome morphology suggest that the diversification at intraspecific level in genus Vigna has occurred through structural alteration of chromosomes, rather than numerical changes. Heterochromatin distribution as revealed by fluorochrome binding pattern using CMA3 and DAPI, confirms the occurrence of relatively more GC content in V. aconitifolia as compared to V. umbellata. However, AT content was found to be comparatively higher in V. umbellata which perhaps play a role in species interrelationships.
Asymmetry index, C-heterochromatin, Fabaceae , karyotype, NOR-chromosomes, Vigna
The pantropical genus Vigna Savi, 1824 (Fabaceae) includes 104 described species (
The structure and morphology of the chromosomes are of vital importance when studying the origin, evolution and classification of taxa (
Chromosome location and characterization of C-heterochromatin by fluorescence staining procedures which preferentially stain GC-rich DNA and DAPI, which localised AT-rich regions has been successfully applied in a large number of Fabaceae taxa including Cicer arietinum Linnaeus, 1753 (
A certain degree of chromosomal variation at inter-specific level of the genus Vigna has been documented using cytogenetic approaches by earlier workers (
Karyo-morphological studies were undertaken in ten accessions each of V. umbellata and V. aconitifolia. The germplasm has been obtained from Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Baranapi, Meghalaya and also from National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), New Delhi. Actively growing root tips of about 1–2 cm long were excised from germinating seeds on moist filter paper in Petri dishes at 25 ± 2 °C, pre-treated with 0.025% colchicine (Himedia) for 3 h at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C). The root tips after pre-treatment were fixed in freshly prepared ethanol-acetic acid (v/v, 3:1) and subsequently stored at 4 °C until required. For slide preparation, the root tips were washed twice in distilled water, hydrolyzed in 1N HCl at 60 °C for 8 min and stained in Feulgen stain (leuco-basic fuchsin) for 45 min. The stained root tips were thoroughly washed and subsequently squashed in 1% acetocarmine. The micro-photographs of the metaphase plates were taken from both temporary and permanent preparations. At least 10–15 clear preparations of chromosome complements of each species were analyzed. Photo-idiograms were prepared from photomicrographs by cutting out individual chromosome and arranging them in descending order of their length and matching on the basis of morphology, the chromosomes were resolved into 11pairs. The standard method of chromosome classification given by
For heterochromatin characterization, root-tips were digested in 2% cellulase and 20% pectinase solution for 180 min at 37°C. Meristems were washed in distilled water, squashed in a drop of 45% acetic acid, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The slides were stained with DAPI (2 µg/ml): glycerol (1:1, v/v) solution to allow selection of the best plates. Subsequently, they were destained in ethanol: glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 30 min and transferred to absolute ethanol for 1 h, both at room temperature. Slides were air-dried and aged for 3 days at room temperature. The slides were stained with CMA3 (0.5 mg/ml, 1 h) and DAPI (2 µg/ml, 30 min), mounted in McIlvaine’s buffer (pH 7.0): glycerol (1:1, v/v), and stored for 3 days (
The somatic chromosome number of all the accessions had consistently 2n = 2x = 22 (Fig.
Various accessions of these species have shown distinctive variation in the karyotype with respect to number of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes (Fig.
Mitotic complements of 10 accessions of V. umbellata. a–j:a BKSB 205 b TRB 160 c RBS 35 d IC 551699 e BKSB 192 f RBS 53 g IC 55440 h IC 176563 i EC 97882 j BKSB 194 k–t:k IC 36157 l VDV 6175 m IC 472147 n RM 040 o IC 39809 p IC 285159 q IC 36592 r IC 472173 s IC 39713 t IC 36562. Bar = 5 μm.
Photo-idiograms of a–j 10 accessions of V. umbellata a BKSB 205 b TRB 160 c RBS 35 d IC 551699 e BKSB 192, f RBS 53 g IC 55440 h IC 176563 i EC 97882 j BKSB 194 k–t 10 accessions of V. aconitifolia k IC 36157 l VDV 6175 m IC 472147 n RM 040 o IC 39809 p IC 285159 q IC 36592 r IC 472173 s IC 39713 t IC 36562. Heteromorphic groups marked above the short arm and nucleolar groups are marked below the long arm.
Sl. no. | Species | Accessions no. | 2n | Chromosome arm length (L/S ratio) | Ratio of longest and shortest chromosome | Karyotype formula | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X | XI | ||||||
1 | V. umbellata | BKSB 205 | 22 | 1.12 1.14 |
1.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 2V + 20L |
2 | V. umbellata | TRB 160 | 22 | 1.2 1.5 |
1.1 1.25 |
1.75 | 1.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 2.2 | 12V + 10L |
3 | V. umbellata | RBS 35 | 22 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.15 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 2.8 | 12V + 10L |
4 | V. umbellata | IC 551699 | 22 | 1 1 |
1.3 | 1.7 | 1.15 | 1.57 | 1.75 | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | 12V + 10L |
5 | V. umbellata | BKSB 192 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.25 | 1.12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 2.0 | 16V + 6L |
6 | V. umbellata | RBS 53 | 22 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 2.3 | 12V + 10L |
7 | V. umbellata | IC 55440 | 22 | 1.57 1.42 |
1.2 | 1.35 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.15 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 6V + 16L |
8 | V. umbellata | IC 176563 | 22 | 1.14 1.28 |
1.6 | 1.1 | 1.25 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 2.6 | 8V + 14L |
9 | V. umbellata | EC 97882 | 22 | 1.7 | 1.47 | 1.2 | 1.37 | 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1.65 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 2.3 | 8V + 14L |
10 | V. umbellata | BKSB 194 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.0 | 12V + 10L |
11 | V. aconitifolia | IC 36157 | 22 | 1.33 | 1.9 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.1 1.5 |
1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.75 | 6V + 16L |
12 | V. aconitifolia | VDV 6175 | 22 | 1.5 1.66 |
2.5 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 4V + 16L + 2J |
13 | V. aconitifolia | IC 472147 | 22 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 2 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 2.25 | 10V + 12L |
14 | V. aconitifolia | RM 040 | 22 | 1.5 | 1.66 | 3 2 |
1.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.75 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 2V + 18L + 2J |
15 | V. aconitifolia | IC 39809 | 22 | 1.57 | 2 | 1.66 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.16 | 1 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 1 | 3.0 | 4V + 18L |
16 | V. aconitifolia | IC 285159 | 22 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | 10V + 12L |
17 | V. aconitifolia | IC 36592 | 22 | 1.75 1.6 |
1.62 | 1 | 1 | 1.66 | 1 | 1 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1 | 2 | 2.16 | 10V + 12L |
18 | V. aconitifolia | IC 472173 | 22 | 2.4 1.8 |
1.83 2 |
1.86 | 1.25 | 1.12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.25 | 14V + 8L |
19 | V. aconitifolia | IC 39713 | 22 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.25 | 6V + 16L |
20 | V. aconitifolia | IC 36562 | 22 | 1.58 | 3 | 1.49 | 1.33 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 8V + 14L |
Karyotype formulae and characteristics in the studied taxa of Vigna. SC the shortest chromosome length; LC the longest chromosome length; CL mean length of chromosome; CI mean centromeric index; SD standard deviation; CVCL component expressing the relative variation in chromosome length; MCA mean centromeric asymmetry.
Sl. no. | Accessions no. | 2n | Range SC-LC (μm) |
Ratio LC/SC |
CL (μm) Mean (± SD) |
CI Mean (± SD) | CVCL | MCA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BKSB 205 | 22 | 17-7 | 2.4 | 9.13 (± 2.76) | 42.87 (± 3.47) | 30.25 | 14.30 |
2 | TRB 160 | 22 | 11-5 | 2.2 | 7.95(± 1.55) | 45.22 (± 4.65) | 19.59 | 9.09 |
3 | RBS 35 | 22 | 17-6 | 2.8 | 9.18(± 2.95) | 46.93 (± 3.85) | 32.19 | 6.18 |
4 | IC 551699 | 22 | 24-6 | 4 | 11.5(± 4.3) | 45.59 (± 5.03) | 37.4 | 9.06 |
5 | BKSB 192 | 22 | 12-6 | 2 | 8.45(± 1.78) | 48.57 (± 2.49) | 21.16 | 2.81 |
6 | RBS 53 | 22 | 14-6 | 2.3 | 8.40(± 1.74) | 47.09 (± 2.91) | 20.72 | 5.78 |
7 | IC 55440 | 22 | 18-6 | 3 | 9.31(± 2.99) | 46.55 (± 2.92) | 32.13 | 6.49 |
8 | IC 176563 | 22 | 16-6 | 2.6 | 9.18(± 2.66) | 44.29 (± 4.65) | 29.02 | 11.37 |
9 | EC 97882 | 22 | 14-6 | 2.3 | 9.18(± 2.27) | 44.94 (± 3.94) | 24.82 | 55.07 |
10 | BKSB 194 | 22 | 18-4 | 3 | 7.09(± 1.62) | 46.75 (± 3.55) | 22.86 | 6.49 |
11 | IC 36157 | 22 | 7-4 | 1.75 | 5.22 (± 1.04) | 42.44 (± 6.07) | 19.92 | 15.32 |
12 | VDV 6175 | 22 | 10-4 | 2.5 | 5.68 (± 1.54) | 40.76 (± 7.06) | 27.25 | 18.55 |
13 | IC 472147 | 22 | 9-4 | 2.25 | 5.81 (± 1.36) | 41.61 (± 8.54) | 23.54 | 16.51 |
14 | RM 040 | 22 | 10-4 | 2.5 | 6.09 (± 1.67) | 38.78 (± 6.45) | 27.52 | 22.88 |
15 | IC 39809 | 22 | 12-4 | 3 | 6.72 (± 2.02) | 42.04 (± 6.17) | 30.12 | 16.22 |
16 | IC 285159 | 22 | 7-2 | 3.5 | 4.68 (± 1.25) | 43.63 (± 5.72) | 26.85 | 10.8 |
17 | IC 36592 | 22 | 11-6 | 2.16 | 7.95 (± 1.60) | 43.89 (± 6.32) | 20.22 | 12.21 |
18 | IC 472173 | 22 | 17-4 | 4.25 | 8.59 (± 3.66) | 44.99 (± 7.29) | 42.64 | 10.14 |
19 | IC 39713 | 22 | 9-4 | 2.25 | 5.72 (± 1.28) | 40.47 (± 6.85) | 22.44 | 19.05 |
20 | IC 36562 | 22 | 10-4 | 2.5 | 6.22 (± 1.47) | 43.34 (± 8.09) | 23.68 | 15.13 |
Telocentric chromosomes were absent in both the taxa studied. Heteromorphic chromosomes were observed in some of the V. umbellata accessions: BKSB 205 (1st pair, Fig.
According to the scatter plot obtained by CVCL vs. MCA, BKSB 192 (V. umbellata) and EC 97882 (V. umbellata) showed the lowest (2.81) and highest (55.07) MCA respectively (Fig.
A comparative account of heterochromatin distribution pattern within the chromosome complements in V. umbellata and V. aconitifolia has been summarized in Table
Differentially stained mitotic chromosomes complements a–b V. umbellata c–d V. aconitifolia. Arrows indicate CMA+ and DAPI+ sites. Scale bar = 5 µm in all the figures.
Scatter plot based on the karyotype parameters MCA (x axis) vs. CVCL (y axis) a BKSB 192 b RBS 53 c RBS 35 d BKSB 194 e IC 55440 f IC 551699 g TRB 160 h IC 472173 i IC 285159 j IC 176563 k IC 36592 l BKSB 205 m IC 36562 n IC 36157 o IC 39809 p IC 472147 q VDV 6175 r IC 39713 s RM 040 t EC 97882.
Distribution of CMA+ and DAPI+ sites in the chromosomes of Vigna species.
Species | Mean± SD of CMA+ sites in chromosomes | Mean± SD of DAPI+ sites in chromosomes | Range of CMA+ sites Terminal | Range of DAPI+ sites Interstitial | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terminal | Interstitial | Terminal | Interstitial | |||
V. umbellata | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 1.9 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.8 |
V. aconitifolia | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 2 ± 1.2 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 2 ± 1.2 |
The present data, combined with the chromosome counts available from the literature confirm the somatic chromosome number of 2n = 22 for both species, V. umbellata and V. aconitifolia. Such observation received support from reports of
All the accessions of V. umbellata and V. aconitifolia have shown no deviation in somatic chromosome numbers and overall karyotype appearance. However, V. umbellata had a higher degree of karyotype asymmetry as compared to V. aconitifolia, suggesting structural rearrangements in karyotypes. Hence, the observed karyotype variation is likely to have originated by structural changes in chromosomes vs. duplication, deletions, interchanges and inversions (
Due to the very small size of chromosomes accompanied by technical difficulties, the nucleolus organisers among the chromosome complements could not be clearly resolved. Other cytogenetic techniques such as silver staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be useful in detecting NOR-loci on chromosomes.
The DAPI+ binding sites in chromosomes, which are indicative of AT-rich region, were recorded in the interstitial regions of chromosomes in V. umbellata. However CMA+ sites, found mostly in V. aconitifolia chromosomes, suggest that the heterochromatin blocks were rich in GC base composition at terminal regions of chromosomes. The higher distribution of AT- and GC- repetitive sequence in heterochromatin blocks is probably reflecting the processes of divergent evolution of repetitive sequences, in heterochromatin regions of Vigna species (Shamurailatpam et al. 2014).
In the course of evolution, most of the heterochromatin regions tend to increase (
The present work is supported by a grant from the World Bank funded by Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) project received through National Agriculture Innovation Program (NAIP). We thank the Head, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North Eastern Hill University (NEHU), Shillong for providing facilities. Sincere thanks are also due to members of the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory for their help. The generous support for germplasm of V. umbellata extended by Dr. A. Pattanayak, Division of Biotechnology, ICAR complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Barapani, Meghalaya is duly acknowledged.