Research Article
Research Article
The contribution of cytogenetics and flow cytometry for understanding the karyotype evolution in three Dorstenia (Linnaeus, 1753) species (Moraceae)
expand article infoPaulo Marcos Amaral-Silva, Wellington Ronildo Clarindo, Tatiana Tavares Carrijo, Carlos Roberto Carvalho§, Milene Miranda Praça-Fontes
‡ Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Alegre, Brazil
§ Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
Open Access


Chromosome morphometry and nuclear DNA content are useful data for cytotaxonomy and for understanding the evolutionary history of different taxa. However, the chromosome number is the only karyotype aspect reported for the species of Dorstenia so far. In this study, the nuclear genome size of Dorstenia arifolia (Lamarck, 1786), Dorstenia bonijesu (Carauta & C. Valente, 1983) and Dorstenia elata (Hooker, 1840) was evaluated and their karyotype morphometry accomplished, with the aim of verifying the potential of those parameters to understand evolutionary issues. Mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 3.49 picograms (pg) for D. elata to 2C = 5.47 pg for D. arifolia, a variation of ± 1.98 pg. Even though showing a marked difference in 2C value, the three species exhibited the same 2n = 32. Corroborating the flow cytometry data, differences in chromosome morphology were found among the karyotypes of the species investigated. Based on this and the only phylogeny proposed for Dorstenia thus far, structural rearrangements are related to the karyotype variations among the three species. Besides, the karyological analysis suggests a polyploid origin of the Dorstenia species studied here.


Cytogenetics, euploidy, karyotype, flow cytometry, chromosome structure


The pantropical genus Dorstenia Linnaeus, 1753 comprises about 105 species distributed in Asia, Africa and Neotropical regions (Carauta 1978, Berg 2001). Thirty-nine species occur in Brazil (Romaniuc-Neto et al. 2015), representing the sections Dorstenia Linnaeus, 1753, Emigdioa Carauta, 1976 and Lecanium Fischer & Meyer, 1846. Carauta (1978) and Berg (2001) have contributed much of the knowledge about the morphology of Neotropical species, while the phylogenetic reconstructions using molecular data (Misiewicz and Zerega 2012) consolidated the hypothesis about the genus’ monophyly. Despite the potential information of cytogenetic data for taxonomic (Stace 2000) and phylogenetic studies (Melo and Guerra 2003), this marker has been little explored in previous works on Dorstenia.

According to the current knowledge, the basic chromosome number in African species of Dorstenia is x = 12 and x = 13, while in American species x = 14, 15 and 16 (Berg 2001) are found. Fagerlind (1944) reported Dorstenia mannii Hooker f., 1871 as a tetraploid (2n = 48). In addition, intraspecific variation in chromosome number have been reported for subspecies of Dorstenia psilurus Welwitsch, 1869 (2n = 26 and 2n = 40) (Misiewicz and Zerega 2012) and Dorstenia elata Hooker, 1840 2n = 26 or 32 (Krause 1931, Hoen 1983, unpublished data). These data indicate that the evolution of the karyotype in Dorstenia involved euploidy and aneuploidy events. However, it is still necessary to invest efforts in confirming and understanding the chromosome changes reported for some species in previous studies. Considering that chromosome alterations are a significant mechanism of diversification and speciation in Angiosperms (Stace 2000, Peer et al. 2009, Weiss-Schneeweiss et al. 2013), the investigation of this aspect in Dorstenia can bring light to the knowledge of speciation processes in the genus.

Cytogenetic approaches, which regard the chromosome number, morphometric measurements and karyotype analysis, contribute to the understanding of evolutionary processes in plants (Shan et al. 2003). The knowledge of these aspects in related species helps to elucidate issues related to diversification of a taxonomic group (Clarindo et al. 2012). Morphometric analysis of the chromosomes is a way to determine the karyotype changes that occurred throughout evolution, the processes that led to the diversification, and the direction taken by evolution (Gao et al. 2012).

Numeric and structural chromosome rearrangements have been reported as triggers of karyotype changes in several plant taxa. Therefore, nuclear genome size variation occurs between phylogenetically related species due to these alterations (Bonifácio et al. 2012, Raskina et al. 2008). For this reason, nuclear DNA content measurement has been increasingly employed in systematic approaches using flow cytometry (FCM). In addition to its practicality and reproducibility, FCM is useful to reveal differences between taxa (Stace 2000), especially in groups of species that exhibit conserved chromosome number (Mabuchi et al. 2005).

The cytogenetic and FCM approaches in Dorstenia could provide relevant information to sections and species taxonomy, as well as contribute to understanding the evolutionary history of the genus. The main goal of this study was therefore to measure the nuclear 2C value, determine the chromosome number and characterize the karyotype of Neotropical species of Dorstenia: D. arifolia Lamarck, 1786, D. bonijesu Carauta & C. Valente, 1983 and D. elata Hooker, 1840.

Material and methods

Plant samples – Specimens of D. elata, D. bonijesu and D. arifolia (Fig. 1 a, c, e, respectively) were collected in an Atlantic Rainforest remnant located in the city of Castelo – ES, Brazil. Voucher specimens were included in the herbarium VIES: T.T. Carrijo 1516 (D. arifolia); T.T. Carrijo 1682 (D. bonijesu) and T.T. Carrijo 1618 (D. elata).

Figure 1.

Representative adult plants of D. elata (a), D. bonijesu (c) and D. arifolia (e) of the Atlantic Rainforest remnant located in the Castelo city (ES, Brazil). FCM histograms showing G0/G1 peaks generated by nuclei suspensions of S. lycopersicum (internal standard, channel 200, 2C = 2.00 pg), and of D. elata (b channel 349, 2C = 3.49 pg), D. bonijesu (d channel 405, 2C = 4.05 pg) and D. arifolia (f channel 547, 2C = 5.47 pg).

FCM – Nuclear suspensions were obtained by chopping (Galbraith et al. 1983) of leaf fragments (1 cm2) excised from each Dorstenia species (sample) and Solanum lycopersicum Linnaeus, 1753 (internal standard, 2C = 2.00 picograms – Praça-Fontes et al. 2011). Samples and standard leaf fragments were simultaneously chopped with razor blade in a Petri dish containing 0.5 ml OTTO-I nuclear extraction buffer (Otto 1990) supplemented with 2 mM dithiothreitol and 50 µg ml-1 RNAse (Praça-Fontes et al. 2011). Afterwards, 0.5 ml of the OTTO-I buffer was added, the suspensions were filtered through 30-µm nylon mesh, placed into microtube and centrifuged at 100 × g for 5 min. The precipitate was resuspended in 100 µl OTTO-I buffer and incubated for 10 min (Praça-Fontes et al. 2011). The nuclei suspensions were stained with 1.5 ml of OTTO-I:OTTO-II (1:2 – Otto 1990, Loureiro et al. 2006) solution supplemented with 2 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µg ml-1 propidium iodide and 50 µg ml-1 RNAse (Praça-Fontes et al. 2011). The nucleus suspensions were kept in the dark for 30 min, then filtered through 20-µm nylon mesh. The samples were analyzed in a flow cytometer Partec PAS II/III (Partec GmbH, Germany). Histograms were analyzed with the Partec Flow Max software tools to measure nuclear DNA content. The genome size of the Dorstenia species was calculated according to the formula:


2CD: value of 2C DNA content (pg) of each Dorstenia species,

C1: average G0/G1 peak channel of the Dorstenia species,

C2: average G0/G1 peak channel of S. lycopersicum,

2CS: value of 2C DNA content of S. lycopersicum (2.00 pg).

Cytogenetics – Stems with length of approximately 15 cm exhibiting one leaf pair were excised and disinfected with 1% NaOCl2 solution for 15 min. These propagules were maintained in hydroponic system for rooting. The system was oxygenated by a compressor coupled to a plastic hose, which was immersed in H2O. The roots were treated with 3 µM or 4 µM amiprophos-methyl (APM) for 16 h or 18 h at 4 °C. The roots were washed in dH2O for 20 min, fixed in methanol:acetic acid solution (3:1) and stored at -20 °C (Carvalho et al. 2007). After 24 h, the roots were washed in dH2O and macerated in pectinase solution 1:40, 1:45, 1:50, 1:55 or 1:60 (enzyme:dH2O) for 1 h 45 min or 2 h at 34 °C. The material was washed in dH2O, fixed again and kept at -20 °C until use. Using the macerated root meristems, slides were prepared by cell dissociation and air-drying techniques, then placed onto a hot plate at 50 °C (Carvalho et al. 2007). The slides were stained with 5% Giemsa (Merck®) for 8 min, washed twice in dH2O, and air-dried. All slides were analyzed under a Nikon Eclipse Ci-S microscope (Nikon). The capture of metaphase images was performed using 100× objective and a CCD camera (Nikon EvolutionTM) coupled to a Nikon 80i microscope (Nikon).

Morphometric analysis – The chromosomes of three Dorstenia species were characterized as to the total length, length of the long and short arms, and classes. The chromosome class was determined as proposed by Levan et al. (1964) and reviewed by Guerra (1986): r = length of the long arm / length of the short arm. The asymmetry of the karyotype was evaluated using the method proposed by Zarco (1986), using the formulae:

where A2 = interchromosomal asymmetry index, s = standard deviation, and X = average length of the chromosomes.


Flow cytometry measurements

The nuclear suspensions resulted in histograms with G0/G1 peaks showing coefficient of variation below 3.45%. Thus, the isolation and staining procedures provided suspensions containing isolated, intact and stoichiometrically stained nuclei. Using the histograms, the mean 2C nuclear DNA content of Dorstenia species was measured for the first time. The values were 2C = 3.49 pg ± 0.0035 (1C = 1.71 bp × 109) for D. elata; 2C = 4.05 pg ± 0.014 (1C = 1.98 bp × 109) for D. bonijesu; and 2C = 5.47 pg ± 0.002 (1C = 2.67 bp × 109) for D. arifolia (Fig. 1 b, d, f). The mean value for D. arifolia was 36.20% higher than for D. elata, and 26.00% greater than for D. bonijesu. Besides, D. bonijesu showed a DNA content 13.83% higher than that of D. elata. Based on these values, an interspecific variation of the nuclear genome size was identified between the species.


The rooting of vegetative propagules occurred after 40 days in hydroponic system. The disinfection of the propagules contributed for relatively rapid rooting due to absence of contamination. Owing to the lack of cytogenetic studies for the genus Dorstenia, we tested different treatments with microtubule inhibitor as well as distinct procedures of enzymatic maceration. Root meristems treated with 4 µM APM for 16 h at 4 °C and macerated in 1:60 pectinase solution for 1 h 45 min at 34 °C resulted in metaphases adequate for karyotype characterization of the Dorstenia species (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Karyograms assembled from mitotic chromosomes of D. elata (a, b), D. bonijesu (c) and D. arifolia (d). Note the distinct chromatin compact level (a, b) showed by the mitotic chromosomes of D. elata. a, b D. elata showed twelve metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 and 16), two submetacentric (3 and 6) and two acrocentric pair (11 and 12) c D. bonijesu exhibited four metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 3 and 15), ten submetacentric (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) and two acrocentric ones (7 and 16) d D. arifolia presented four metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 5 and 10) and twelve submetacentric ones (3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16). Bar: 5 μm.

The differences chromatin compaction levels verified among the metaphases (Fig. 2 a, b) of the species allowed morphometric analysis (Table 1) and karyogram assembly (Fig. 2). All Dorstenia species showed a conserved number of 32 chromosomes.

Table 1.

Morphometry of the metaphasic chromosomes of D. elata (2C = 3.49 pg, 2n = 32), D. bonijesu (2C = 4.05 pg, 2n = 32) and D. arifolia (2C = 5.47 pg, 2n = 32).

Chrom. D. elata D. bonijesu D. arifolia
Total (µm) Arms r Class Size (%) Total (µm) Arms r Class Size (%) Total (µm) Arms r Class Size (%)
Short Long Short Long Short Long
1 4.72 2.09 2.63 1.26 M 8.01 4.50 1.95 2.55 1.31 M 7.97 5.39 2.57 2.82 1.10 M 7.93
2 4.27 2.00 2.27 1.14 M 7.25 4.27 1.90 2.37 1.25 M 7.56 5.21 2.45 2.76 1.13 M 7.67
3 4.21 1.66 2.55 1.54 SM 7.15 4.04 1.81 2.23 1.23 M 7.15 4.87 1.48 3.39 2.29 SM 7.17
4 3.87 1.78 2.09 1.17 M 6.57 4.00 1.45 2.55 1.76 SM 7.08 4.81 1.39 3.42 2.46 SM 7.08
5 3.84 1.75 2.09 1.19 M 6.52 3.86 1.27 2.59 2.04 SM 6.83 4.69 2.27 2.42 1.07 M 6.90
6 3.81 1.48 2.33 1.57 SM 6.47 3.81 1.45 2.36 1.63 SM 6.75 4.36 1.42 2.94 2.07 SM 6.42
7 3.81 1.69 2.12 1.25 M 6.47 3.72 0.90 2.82 3.13 A 6.59 4.33 1.39 2.94 2.12 SM 6.37
8 3.72 1.57 2.15 1.37 M 6.32 3.59 1.22 2.37 1.94 SM 6.36 4.18 1.45 2.73 1.88 SM 6.15
9 3.66 1.54 2.12 1.38 M 6.21 3.59 1.22 2.37 1.94 SM 6.36 4.18 1.27 2.91 2.29 SM 6.15
10 3.59 1.75 1.84 1.05 M 6.10 3.54 1.00 2.54 2.54 SM 6.27 3.93 1.81 2.12 1.17 M 5.78
11 3.54 0.71 2.83 3.99 A 6.01 3.40 0.95 2.45 2.58 SM 6.02 3.93 1.36 2.57 1.89 SM 5.78
12 3.48 0.62 2.86 4.61 A 5.91 3.04 0.86 2.18 2.53 SM 5.38 3.84 1.39 2.45 1.76 SM 5.65
13 3.30 1.33 1.97 1.48 M 5.60 2.95 0.95 2.00 2.11 SM 5.22 3.78 1.21 2.57 2.12 SM 5.56
14 3.24 1.42 1.82 1.28 M 5.50 2.95 0.81 2.14 2.64 SM 5.22 3.63 1.18 2.45 2.08 SM 5.34
15 3.03 1.30 1.73 1.33 M 5.14 2.63 1.09 1.54 1.41 M 4.66 3.51 1.24 2.27 1.83 SM 5.16
16 2.81 1.36 1.45 1.07 M 4.77 2.59 0.59 2.00 3.39 A 4.59 3.33 1.21 2.12 1.75 SM 4.90
Sum 56.09 24.36 34.54 - - 100.00 53.89 19.42 37.06 - - 100.00 64.64 25.09 42.88 - - 100.00

Morphometric analysis of the chromosomes

The mean values for the sum of total length as well as short- and long-arm length differed among the species (Table 1). D. arifolia showed the highest total, short- and long-arm length in relation to other species, corroborating the FCM data. D. bonijesu, which exhibited an intermediate mean 2C value, presented the lowest total chromosome and short-arm length. In comparison to D. elata, D. bonijesu displayed a greater mean value for the long arm (Table 1). The A2 index also varied between the species: D. bonijesu exhibited the most asymmetrical karyotype, with A2 = 0.16, followed by D. arifolia (A2 = 0.14) and D. elata (A2 = 0.13).

Based on the morphometric data, the chromosome class was determined and the differences between the karyotypes for the three species were endorsed. D. elata showed twelve metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 and 16), two submetacentric (3 and 6) and two acrocentric pair (11 and 12) (Fig. 2 a, b). D. bonijesu exhibited four metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 3 and 15), ten submetacentric (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) and two acrocentric ones (7 and 16) (Fig. 2c). D. arifolia presented four metacentric chromosome pairs (1, 2, 5 and 10) and twelve submetacentric ones (3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16) (Fig. 2d).


Despite exhibiting the same number of chromosomes (2n = 32), the species of Dorstenia studied here show distinct mean nuclear 2C values. The interspecific DNA content variation indicates that the karyotypes differ between the species (Gitaí et al. 2014). Considering that the Dorstenia species have the same chromosome number, the karyotype divergences are probably associated to chromosome structure.

The morphometric analysis revealed karyomorphological differences in the sum of the mean values for total chromosome length, and the short arm and long arm (Table 1). Besides, some chromosomes presented distinct classes among the species, such as in chromosomes 7 and 16, which are submetacentric in D. arifolia, acrocentric in D. bonijesu and metacentric in D. elata (Fig. 2, Table 1). In view of this, structural chromosomal rearrangements have occurred during the evolutionary history of the group. This is supported by the interchromosomal asymmetry index (A2, Zarco 1986), which also varied between the three Dorstenia species, despite the predominance of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. Therefore, the FCM and cytogenetic data indicate that structural chromosome changes have occurred throughout the evolution of these Dorstenia species.

According to the more recent phylogeny for the genus, D. arifolia occupies a basal position in comparison to D. elata (Misiewicz and Zerega 2012). Given that D. arifolia has mean nuclear 2C value and total genome length (Fig. 1 and 2, Table 1) greater than D. elata, the structural chromosome alterations seem to promote loss of DNA sequences. Thus, deletions can be involved in the karyotype changes in Dorstenia.

Based on the morphometric analysis, groups of morphologically identical chromosome pairs were found for each Dorstenia species: 3–4, 6–7, 11–12 and 13–14 in D. arifolia; 5–6, 11–12 and 13–14 in D. bonijesu; and 7–8 and 14–15 in D. elata (Fig. 2, Table 1). Regarding this karyotype aspect, polyploidization events have occurred during the evolution of these species. As the three species produces reduced reproductive cells (x = 16), the disploidy can also explain the evolutionary scenario of the Dorstenia karyotype. The polyploid origin of plant species has been shown by classical cytogenetics, such as for the genera Psidium Linnaeus, 1753 (Souza et al. 2015), Claytonia Linnaeus, 1753 (McIntyre 2012) and Cardamine Linnaeus, 1753 (Marhold et al. 2010). From the assembly of accurate karyograms using chromosomes with different levels of chromatin compaction, the type of polyploidy was also evidenced, with autopolyploidy being found in Glycine max (Linnaeus, 1753) Merrill, 1917 (Clarindo et al. 2007) and Zephyranthes Herbert, 1821 (Felix et al. 2011), and allopolyploidy in Paullinia cupana Kunth, 1821 (Freitas et al. 2007) and Triticum aestivum Linnaeus, 1753 (Kamel 2006). Polyploidy has played a key role in plant evolution, with estimates maintaining euploidy in the ascendancy of all angiosperms (Abbott et al. 2013, Soltis et al. 2014). In addition, 15% of speciation events in this taxon are directly involved with polyploidization (Abbott et al. 2013).


The nuclear 2C value and karyogram indicate changes covering chromosome number and structure that occurred during the karyotype evolution of D. arifolia, D. bonijesu and D. elata. The combination of FCM and classical cytogenetics revealed differences among the Dorstenia species that can be exploited in phylogenetic approaches, as the results support the current knowledge on the phylogeny of Dorstenia.


The authors are grateful to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília – DF, Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES, Vitória – ES, Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Belo Horizonte – MG, Brazil), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília – DF, Brazil) for financial support.


  • Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJE, Bierne N, Boughman J, Brelsford A, Buerkle CA, Buggs R, Butlin RK, Dieckmann U, Eroukhmanoff F, Grill A, Cahan SH, Hermansen JS, Hewitt G, Hudson AG, Jiggins C, Jones J, Keller B, Marczewski T, Mallet J, Martinez-Rodriguez P, Möst M, Mullen S, Nichols R, Nolte AW, Parisod C, Pfennig K, Rice AM, Ritchie MG, Seifert B, Smadja CM, Stelkens R, Szymura JM, Väinölä R, Wolf JBW, Zinner D (2013) Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 229–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x
  • Berg CC (2001) Moreae, Artocarpeae and Dorstenia (Moraceae). With introductions to the family and Ficus and with additions and corrections to Flora Neotropica Monograph 7. Flora Neotropica Monograph 83: 1–346.
  • Bonifácio EM, Fonsêca A, Almeida C, Santos KGB, Pedrosa-Harand A (2012) Comparative cytogenetic mapping between the lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) and the common bean (P. vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 1513–1520. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1806-x
  • Carauta JPP (1978) Dorstenia L. (Moraceae) do Brasil e países limítrofes. Rodriguésia 29: 53–223.
  • Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR, Almeida PM (2007) Plant cytogenetics: still looking for the perfect mitotic chromosomes. Nucleus 50: 453–462.
  • Clarindo WR, Carvalho CR, Alves BMG (2007) Mitotic evidence for the tetraploid nature of Glycine max provided by high quality karyograms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 265: 101–107. doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0522-5
  • Clarindo WR, Carvalho CR, Mendonça MAC (2012) Cytogenetic and flow cytometry data expand knowledge of genome evolution in three Coffea species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298: 835–844. doi: 10.1007/s00606-012-0595-7
  • Fagerlind F (1944) Die samenbildung und die zytology bei agamosper-mischen und sexuellen arten von Elatostema und einigen nahestehenden gattungen nebst geleuchtung einiger damit zusammenhängender probleme. Kung Svensk Vet Akad Handl 21: 1–130.
  • Felix WJP, Felix LP, Melo NF, Oliveira MBM, Dutilh JHA, Carvalho R (2011) Karyotype variability in species of the genus Zephyranthes Herb. (Amaryllidaceae–Hippeastreae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 294: 263–271. doi: 10.1007/s00606-011-0467-6
  • Freitas DV, Carvalho CR, Filho FJN, Astolfi-Filho S (2007) Karyotype with 210 chromosomes in guaraná (Paullinia cupana ‘Sorbilis’). Journal of Plant Research 120: 399–404. doi: 10.1007/s10265-007-0073-4
  • Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049
  • Gao YD, Zhou SD, He XJ, Wan J (2012) Chromosome diversity and evolution in tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) with emphasis on Chinese species. Journal of Plant Research 125: 55–69. doi: 10.1007/s10265-011-0422-1
  • Gitaí J, Paule J, Zizka G, Schulte K, Benko-Iseppon AM (2014) Chromosome numbers and DNA content in Bromeliaceae: additional data and critical review. The Journal of the Linnean Society 176: 349–368. doi: 10.1111/boj.12211
  • Guerra MS (1986) Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Revista Brasileira de Genetética 9: 741–743.
  • Kamel EAR (2006) Karyotype characterization and polyploid variations in some genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Cytologia 71: 169–174. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.71.169
  • Krause O (1931) Zytologische Studien bei den Urticales unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Gattung Dorstenia. Planta 13: 29–84. doi: 10.1007/BF01908980
  • Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C (2006) Comparison of four nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry. Annals of Botany 98: 679–689. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl141
  • Mabuchi T, Kokubun H, Mii M, Ando T (2005) Nuclear DNA content in the genus Hepatica (Ranunculaceae). Journal of Plant Research 118: 37–41. doi: 10.1007/s10265-005-0191-9
  • Marhold K, Kudoh H, Pak JH, Watanabe K, Španiel S, Lihová J (2010) Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in eastern Asian polyploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) species. Annals of Botany 105: 249–264. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp282
  • McIntyre JP (2012) Cytogeography and genome size variation in the Claytonia perfoliata (Portulacaceae) polyploid complex. Annals of Botany 110: 1195–1203. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs187
  • Melo NF, Guerra M (2003) Variability of the 5S and 45S rDNA sites in Passiflora L. species with distintic base chromosome numbers. Annals of Botany 92: 309–316. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg138
  • Misiewicz TM, Zerega NC (2012) Phylogeny, biogeography and character evolution of Dorstenia (Moraceae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 69: 413–440. doi: 10.1017/S096042861200025X
  • Otto FJ (1990) DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Darzynkiewiez Z, Crissman HA, Robinson JP (Eds) Methods in cell biology.San Diego Academic Press, San Diego, Ca, 105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60516-6
  • Peer YV, Maere S, Meyer A (2009) The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 725–732. doi: 10.1038/nrg2600
  • Praça-Fontes MM, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR, Cruz CD (2011) Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the ‘‘best primary standards’’. Plant Cell Reports 30: 1183–1191. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1026-x
  • Raskina O, Barber JC, Nevo E, Belyayev A (2008) Repetitive DNA and chromosomal rearrangements: speciation-related events in plant genomes. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 120: 351–377. doi: 10.1159/000121084
  • Romaniuc-Neto S, Carauta JPP, Vianna-Filho MDM, Pereira RAS, Ribeiro JELS, Machado AFP, Santos A, Pelissari G, Pederneiras LC (2015) Moraceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro.[accessed 22 June 2015]
  • Shan F, Yan G, Plummer JA (2013) Karyotype evolution in the genus Boronia (Rutaceae). The Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 309–320. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00163.x
  • Soltis DE, Visger CJ, Soltis PS (2014) The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited. American Journal of Botany 101: 1057–1078. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400178
  • Souza AG, Resende LV, Lima IP, Martins LSS, Techio VH (2015) Chromosome number and nuclear DNA amount in Psidium spp. resistant and susceptible to Meloidogyne enterolobii and its relation with compatibility between rootstocks and commercial varieties of guava tree. Plant Systematics and Evolution 301: 231–237. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1068-y
  • Stace CA (2000) Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21” centuries. Taxon 49: 451–477. doi: 10.2307/1224344
  • Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang TS, Schneeweiss GM (2013) Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 140: 137–150. doi: 10.1159/000351727
  • Zarco RC (1986) A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35: 526–530. doi: 10.2307/1221906
login to comment